Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Screening in STD Clinics, Emergency Departments, and Inpatient Units: A Model-Based Analysis

BACKGROUND: Identifying and treating persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection early in their disease stage is considered an effective means of reducing the impact of the disease. We compared the cost-effectiveness of HIV screening in three settings, sexually transmitted disease (STD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prabhu, Vimalanand S., Farnham, Paul G., Hutchinson, Angela B., Soorapanth, Sada, Heffelfinger, James D., Golden, Matthew R., Brooks, John T., Rimland, David, Sansom, Stephanie L.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3098845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21625489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019936
_version_ 1782204004847058944
author Prabhu, Vimalanand S.
Farnham, Paul G.
Hutchinson, Angela B.
Soorapanth, Sada
Heffelfinger, James D.
Golden, Matthew R.
Brooks, John T.
Rimland, David
Sansom, Stephanie L.
author_facet Prabhu, Vimalanand S.
Farnham, Paul G.
Hutchinson, Angela B.
Soorapanth, Sada
Heffelfinger, James D.
Golden, Matthew R.
Brooks, John T.
Rimland, David
Sansom, Stephanie L.
author_sort Prabhu, Vimalanand S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Identifying and treating persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection early in their disease stage is considered an effective means of reducing the impact of the disease. We compared the cost-effectiveness of HIV screening in three settings, sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics serving men who have sex with men, hospital emergency departments (EDs), settings where patients are likely to be diagnosed early, and inpatient diagnosis based on clinical manifestations. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We developed the Progression and Transmission of HIV/AIDS model, a health state transition model that tracks index patients and their infected partners from HIV infection to death. We used program characteristics for each setting to compare the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained from early versus late diagnosis and treatment. We ran the model for 10,000 index patients for each setting, examining alternative scenarios, excluding and including transmission to partners, and assuming HAART was initiated at a CD4 count of either 350 or 500 cells/µL. Screening in STD clinics and EDs was cost-effective compared with diagnosing inpatients, even when including only the benefits to the index patients. Screening patients in STD clinics, who have less-advanced disease, was cost-effective compared with ED screening when treatment with HAART was initiated at a CD4 count of 500 cells/µL. When the benefits of reduced transmission to partners from early diagnosis were included, screening in settings with less-advanced disease stages was cost-saving compared with screening later in the course of infection. The study was limited by a small number of observations on CD4 count at diagnosis and by including transmission only to first generation partners of the index patients. CONCLUSIONS: HIV prevention efforts can be advanced by screening in settings where patients present with less-advanced stages of HIV infection and by initiating treatment with HAART earlier in the course of infection.
format Text
id pubmed-3098845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30988452011-05-27 Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Screening in STD Clinics, Emergency Departments, and Inpatient Units: A Model-Based Analysis Prabhu, Vimalanand S. Farnham, Paul G. Hutchinson, Angela B. Soorapanth, Sada Heffelfinger, James D. Golden, Matthew R. Brooks, John T. Rimland, David Sansom, Stephanie L. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Identifying and treating persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection early in their disease stage is considered an effective means of reducing the impact of the disease. We compared the cost-effectiveness of HIV screening in three settings, sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics serving men who have sex with men, hospital emergency departments (EDs), settings where patients are likely to be diagnosed early, and inpatient diagnosis based on clinical manifestations. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We developed the Progression and Transmission of HIV/AIDS model, a health state transition model that tracks index patients and their infected partners from HIV infection to death. We used program characteristics for each setting to compare the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained from early versus late diagnosis and treatment. We ran the model for 10,000 index patients for each setting, examining alternative scenarios, excluding and including transmission to partners, and assuming HAART was initiated at a CD4 count of either 350 or 500 cells/µL. Screening in STD clinics and EDs was cost-effective compared with diagnosing inpatients, even when including only the benefits to the index patients. Screening patients in STD clinics, who have less-advanced disease, was cost-effective compared with ED screening when treatment with HAART was initiated at a CD4 count of 500 cells/µL. When the benefits of reduced transmission to partners from early diagnosis were included, screening in settings with less-advanced disease stages was cost-saving compared with screening later in the course of infection. The study was limited by a small number of observations on CD4 count at diagnosis and by including transmission only to first generation partners of the index patients. CONCLUSIONS: HIV prevention efforts can be advanced by screening in settings where patients present with less-advanced stages of HIV infection and by initiating treatment with HAART earlier in the course of infection. Public Library of Science 2011-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3098845/ /pubmed/21625489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019936 Text en This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Prabhu, Vimalanand S.
Farnham, Paul G.
Hutchinson, Angela B.
Soorapanth, Sada
Heffelfinger, James D.
Golden, Matthew R.
Brooks, John T.
Rimland, David
Sansom, Stephanie L.
Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Screening in STD Clinics, Emergency Departments, and Inpatient Units: A Model-Based Analysis
title Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Screening in STD Clinics, Emergency Departments, and Inpatient Units: A Model-Based Analysis
title_full Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Screening in STD Clinics, Emergency Departments, and Inpatient Units: A Model-Based Analysis
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Screening in STD Clinics, Emergency Departments, and Inpatient Units: A Model-Based Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Screening in STD Clinics, Emergency Departments, and Inpatient Units: A Model-Based Analysis
title_short Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Screening in STD Clinics, Emergency Departments, and Inpatient Units: A Model-Based Analysis
title_sort cost-effectiveness of hiv screening in std clinics, emergency departments, and inpatient units: a model-based analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3098845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21625489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019936
work_keys_str_mv AT prabhuvimalanands costeffectivenessofhivscreeninginstdclinicsemergencydepartmentsandinpatientunitsamodelbasedanalysis
AT farnhampaulg costeffectivenessofhivscreeninginstdclinicsemergencydepartmentsandinpatientunitsamodelbasedanalysis
AT hutchinsonangelab costeffectivenessofhivscreeninginstdclinicsemergencydepartmentsandinpatientunitsamodelbasedanalysis
AT soorapanthsada costeffectivenessofhivscreeninginstdclinicsemergencydepartmentsandinpatientunitsamodelbasedanalysis
AT heffelfingerjamesd costeffectivenessofhivscreeninginstdclinicsemergencydepartmentsandinpatientunitsamodelbasedanalysis
AT goldenmatthewr costeffectivenessofhivscreeninginstdclinicsemergencydepartmentsandinpatientunitsamodelbasedanalysis
AT brooksjohnt costeffectivenessofhivscreeninginstdclinicsemergencydepartmentsandinpatientunitsamodelbasedanalysis
AT rimlanddavid costeffectivenessofhivscreeninginstdclinicsemergencydepartmentsandinpatientunitsamodelbasedanalysis
AT sansomstephaniel costeffectivenessofhivscreeninginstdclinicsemergencydepartmentsandinpatientunitsamodelbasedanalysis