Cargando…

Human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening and the cut-off level for hybrid capture 2 tests: systematic review

Objective To determine the trade-off between the sensitivity and the specificity for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia at hybrid capture 2 cut-off values above the standard ≥1 relative light units/cut-off level (rlu/co). Design Systematic review. Data sources PubMed. Study selection Rand...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rebolj, Matejka, Bonde, Jesper, Njor, Sisse Helle, Lynge, Elsebeth
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3099543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21606136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d2757
_version_ 1782204066997207040
author Rebolj, Matejka
Bonde, Jesper
Njor, Sisse Helle
Lynge, Elsebeth
author_facet Rebolj, Matejka
Bonde, Jesper
Njor, Sisse Helle
Lynge, Elsebeth
author_sort Rebolj, Matejka
collection PubMed
description Objective To determine the trade-off between the sensitivity and the specificity for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia at hybrid capture 2 cut-off values above the standard ≥1 relative light units/cut-off level (rlu/co). Design Systematic review. Data sources PubMed. Study selection Randomised controlled trials in primary cervical screening using hybrid capture 2 testing in the intervention arms. Articles published until August 2010 were included if the numbers of women with positive test results and with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia were stratified by hybrid capture 2 cut-off levels. Participants Women in the baseline screening rounds of the trials. Interventions Hybrid capture 2 screening in the baseline round including the diagnostic follow-up as practised in the randomised controlled trials and as reported by hybrid capture 2 cut-off values. Results Owing to heterogeneity in the trials, meta-analysis was not possible. Including cut-off values up to ≥10 rlu/co, 25 observation points were available for analysis. The relative sensitivity for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III or higher at cut-off levels of ≥2, ≥4 or ≥5, and ≥10 rlu/co compared with a cut-off level of ≥1 rlu/co varied by trial, but at their lowest they were 0.97, 0.92, and 0.91, respectively. A similar pattern was observed for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II or higher. The specificity would increase by at least 1%, 2%, and 3%, respectively, so that up to 24%, 39%, and 53%, of positive hybrid capture 2 test results not associated with high grade neoplasia could be avoided. Only two outliers existed to this general pattern. Conclusions Although the data were derived from the baseline screening rounds only, the decrease in the sensitivity for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using a hybrid capture 2 cut-off level between ≥2 rlu/co and ≥10 rlu/co seemed acceptable given the international recommendations for testing for human papillomavirus DNA in cervical screening, which require 90% or more sensitivity for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II or higher compared with hybrid capture 2 at ≥1 rlu/co. The data suggest that the hybrid capture 2 cut-off level could be increased in primary screening; this seems reasonably safe and is significantly less burdensome for women.
format Text
id pubmed-3099543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30995432011-06-01 Human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening and the cut-off level for hybrid capture 2 tests: systematic review Rebolj, Matejka Bonde, Jesper Njor, Sisse Helle Lynge, Elsebeth BMJ Research Objective To determine the trade-off between the sensitivity and the specificity for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia at hybrid capture 2 cut-off values above the standard ≥1 relative light units/cut-off level (rlu/co). Design Systematic review. Data sources PubMed. Study selection Randomised controlled trials in primary cervical screening using hybrid capture 2 testing in the intervention arms. Articles published until August 2010 were included if the numbers of women with positive test results and with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia were stratified by hybrid capture 2 cut-off levels. Participants Women in the baseline screening rounds of the trials. Interventions Hybrid capture 2 screening in the baseline round including the diagnostic follow-up as practised in the randomised controlled trials and as reported by hybrid capture 2 cut-off values. Results Owing to heterogeneity in the trials, meta-analysis was not possible. Including cut-off values up to ≥10 rlu/co, 25 observation points were available for analysis. The relative sensitivity for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III or higher at cut-off levels of ≥2, ≥4 or ≥5, and ≥10 rlu/co compared with a cut-off level of ≥1 rlu/co varied by trial, but at their lowest they were 0.97, 0.92, and 0.91, respectively. A similar pattern was observed for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II or higher. The specificity would increase by at least 1%, 2%, and 3%, respectively, so that up to 24%, 39%, and 53%, of positive hybrid capture 2 test results not associated with high grade neoplasia could be avoided. Only two outliers existed to this general pattern. Conclusions Although the data were derived from the baseline screening rounds only, the decrease in the sensitivity for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using a hybrid capture 2 cut-off level between ≥2 rlu/co and ≥10 rlu/co seemed acceptable given the international recommendations for testing for human papillomavirus DNA in cervical screening, which require 90% or more sensitivity for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II or higher compared with hybrid capture 2 at ≥1 rlu/co. The data suggest that the hybrid capture 2 cut-off level could be increased in primary screening; this seems reasonably safe and is significantly less burdensome for women. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2011-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3099543/ /pubmed/21606136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d2757 Text en © Rebolj et al 2011 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Rebolj, Matejka
Bonde, Jesper
Njor, Sisse Helle
Lynge, Elsebeth
Human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening and the cut-off level for hybrid capture 2 tests: systematic review
title Human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening and the cut-off level for hybrid capture 2 tests: systematic review
title_full Human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening and the cut-off level for hybrid capture 2 tests: systematic review
title_fullStr Human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening and the cut-off level for hybrid capture 2 tests: systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening and the cut-off level for hybrid capture 2 tests: systematic review
title_short Human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening and the cut-off level for hybrid capture 2 tests: systematic review
title_sort human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening and the cut-off level for hybrid capture 2 tests: systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3099543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21606136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d2757
work_keys_str_mv AT reboljmatejka humanpapillomavirustestinginprimarycervicalscreeningandthecutofflevelforhybridcapture2testssystematicreview
AT bondejesper humanpapillomavirustestinginprimarycervicalscreeningandthecutofflevelforhybridcapture2testssystematicreview
AT njorsissehelle humanpapillomavirustestinginprimarycervicalscreeningandthecutofflevelforhybridcapture2testssystematicreview
AT lyngeelsebeth humanpapillomavirustestinginprimarycervicalscreeningandthecutofflevelforhybridcapture2testssystematicreview