Cargando…

Evaluation of a local ICU sedation guideline on goal-directed administration of sedatives and analgesics

PURPOSE: Sedatives and analgesics are commonly used in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. Sedation guidelines have been shown to improve sedation management as well as various patient outcomes. The main objective was to evaluate adherence to a sedation guideline with both s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DeGrado, Jeremy R, Anger, Kevin E, Szumita, Paul M, Pierce, Carol D, Massaro, Anthony F
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3100227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21647216
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S18161
_version_ 1782204163887726592
author DeGrado, Jeremy R
Anger, Kevin E
Szumita, Paul M
Pierce, Carol D
Massaro, Anthony F
author_facet DeGrado, Jeremy R
Anger, Kevin E
Szumita, Paul M
Pierce, Carol D
Massaro, Anthony F
author_sort DeGrado, Jeremy R
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Sedatives and analgesics are commonly used in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. Sedation guidelines have been shown to improve sedation management as well as various patient outcomes. The main objective was to evaluate adherence to a sedation guideline with both sedative prescribing and documentation of Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) scores. METHODS: In a retrospective chart review, data was collected on 111 medical intensive care unit patients mechanically ventilated via endotracheal tube for 12 hours or greater at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Fifty-seven patients were evaluated pre-guideline implementation and 54 patients were evaluated post-guideline. RESULTS: Significant increases were seen in the post-guideline group in goal-directed sedation with a patient-specific RASS goal in the sedation order: 21.3 vs 85.4% (P < 0.001), and mean number of sedation assessments per 24 hours using the RASS: 4.7 vs 11.4 (P < 0.001). Similarly, this group experienced a higher percentage of RASS scores at their sedation goal: 31.4 vs 44.1% (P < 0.001). No difference was seen in other clinical endpoints. CONCLUSION: Implementation and routine application of a hospital pain and sedation guideline was associated with significantly improved sedation metrics, such as goal-directed sedation, as well as frequency of sedation level assessment and documentation. An increase was observed in the time that post-guideline patients spent at or near their RASS goal.
format Text
id pubmed-3100227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31002272011-06-06 Evaluation of a local ICU sedation guideline on goal-directed administration of sedatives and analgesics DeGrado, Jeremy R Anger, Kevin E Szumita, Paul M Pierce, Carol D Massaro, Anthony F J Pain Res Original Research PURPOSE: Sedatives and analgesics are commonly used in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. Sedation guidelines have been shown to improve sedation management as well as various patient outcomes. The main objective was to evaluate adherence to a sedation guideline with both sedative prescribing and documentation of Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) scores. METHODS: In a retrospective chart review, data was collected on 111 medical intensive care unit patients mechanically ventilated via endotracheal tube for 12 hours or greater at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Fifty-seven patients were evaluated pre-guideline implementation and 54 patients were evaluated post-guideline. RESULTS: Significant increases were seen in the post-guideline group in goal-directed sedation with a patient-specific RASS goal in the sedation order: 21.3 vs 85.4% (P < 0.001), and mean number of sedation assessments per 24 hours using the RASS: 4.7 vs 11.4 (P < 0.001). Similarly, this group experienced a higher percentage of RASS scores at their sedation goal: 31.4 vs 44.1% (P < 0.001). No difference was seen in other clinical endpoints. CONCLUSION: Implementation and routine application of a hospital pain and sedation guideline was associated with significantly improved sedation metrics, such as goal-directed sedation, as well as frequency of sedation level assessment and documentation. An increase was observed in the time that post-guideline patients spent at or near their RASS goal. Dove Medical Press 2011-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3100227/ /pubmed/21647216 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S18161 Text en © 2011 DeGrado et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
DeGrado, Jeremy R
Anger, Kevin E
Szumita, Paul M
Pierce, Carol D
Massaro, Anthony F
Evaluation of a local ICU sedation guideline on goal-directed administration of sedatives and analgesics
title Evaluation of a local ICU sedation guideline on goal-directed administration of sedatives and analgesics
title_full Evaluation of a local ICU sedation guideline on goal-directed administration of sedatives and analgesics
title_fullStr Evaluation of a local ICU sedation guideline on goal-directed administration of sedatives and analgesics
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a local ICU sedation guideline on goal-directed administration of sedatives and analgesics
title_short Evaluation of a local ICU sedation guideline on goal-directed administration of sedatives and analgesics
title_sort evaluation of a local icu sedation guideline on goal-directed administration of sedatives and analgesics
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3100227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21647216
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S18161
work_keys_str_mv AT degradojeremyr evaluationofalocalicusedationguidelineongoaldirectedadministrationofsedativesandanalgesics
AT angerkevine evaluationofalocalicusedationguidelineongoaldirectedadministrationofsedativesandanalgesics
AT szumitapaulm evaluationofalocalicusedationguidelineongoaldirectedadministrationofsedativesandanalgesics
AT piercecarold evaluationofalocalicusedationguidelineongoaldirectedadministrationofsedativesandanalgesics
AT massaroanthonyf evaluationofalocalicusedationguidelineongoaldirectedadministrationofsedativesandanalgesics