Cargando…
Evaluation of a local ICU sedation guideline on goal-directed administration of sedatives and analgesics
PURPOSE: Sedatives and analgesics are commonly used in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. Sedation guidelines have been shown to improve sedation management as well as various patient outcomes. The main objective was to evaluate adherence to a sedation guideline with both s...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3100227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21647216 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S18161 |
_version_ | 1782204163887726592 |
---|---|
author | DeGrado, Jeremy R Anger, Kevin E Szumita, Paul M Pierce, Carol D Massaro, Anthony F |
author_facet | DeGrado, Jeremy R Anger, Kevin E Szumita, Paul M Pierce, Carol D Massaro, Anthony F |
author_sort | DeGrado, Jeremy R |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Sedatives and analgesics are commonly used in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. Sedation guidelines have been shown to improve sedation management as well as various patient outcomes. The main objective was to evaluate adherence to a sedation guideline with both sedative prescribing and documentation of Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) scores. METHODS: In a retrospective chart review, data was collected on 111 medical intensive care unit patients mechanically ventilated via endotracheal tube for 12 hours or greater at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Fifty-seven patients were evaluated pre-guideline implementation and 54 patients were evaluated post-guideline. RESULTS: Significant increases were seen in the post-guideline group in goal-directed sedation with a patient-specific RASS goal in the sedation order: 21.3 vs 85.4% (P < 0.001), and mean number of sedation assessments per 24 hours using the RASS: 4.7 vs 11.4 (P < 0.001). Similarly, this group experienced a higher percentage of RASS scores at their sedation goal: 31.4 vs 44.1% (P < 0.001). No difference was seen in other clinical endpoints. CONCLUSION: Implementation and routine application of a hospital pain and sedation guideline was associated with significantly improved sedation metrics, such as goal-directed sedation, as well as frequency of sedation level assessment and documentation. An increase was observed in the time that post-guideline patients spent at or near their RASS goal. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3100227 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31002272011-06-06 Evaluation of a local ICU sedation guideline on goal-directed administration of sedatives and analgesics DeGrado, Jeremy R Anger, Kevin E Szumita, Paul M Pierce, Carol D Massaro, Anthony F J Pain Res Original Research PURPOSE: Sedatives and analgesics are commonly used in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. Sedation guidelines have been shown to improve sedation management as well as various patient outcomes. The main objective was to evaluate adherence to a sedation guideline with both sedative prescribing and documentation of Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) scores. METHODS: In a retrospective chart review, data was collected on 111 medical intensive care unit patients mechanically ventilated via endotracheal tube for 12 hours or greater at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Fifty-seven patients were evaluated pre-guideline implementation and 54 patients were evaluated post-guideline. RESULTS: Significant increases were seen in the post-guideline group in goal-directed sedation with a patient-specific RASS goal in the sedation order: 21.3 vs 85.4% (P < 0.001), and mean number of sedation assessments per 24 hours using the RASS: 4.7 vs 11.4 (P < 0.001). Similarly, this group experienced a higher percentage of RASS scores at their sedation goal: 31.4 vs 44.1% (P < 0.001). No difference was seen in other clinical endpoints. CONCLUSION: Implementation and routine application of a hospital pain and sedation guideline was associated with significantly improved sedation metrics, such as goal-directed sedation, as well as frequency of sedation level assessment and documentation. An increase was observed in the time that post-guideline patients spent at or near their RASS goal. Dove Medical Press 2011-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3100227/ /pubmed/21647216 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S18161 Text en © 2011 DeGrado et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research DeGrado, Jeremy R Anger, Kevin E Szumita, Paul M Pierce, Carol D Massaro, Anthony F Evaluation of a local ICU sedation guideline on goal-directed administration of sedatives and analgesics |
title | Evaluation of a local ICU sedation guideline on goal-directed administration of sedatives and analgesics |
title_full | Evaluation of a local ICU sedation guideline on goal-directed administration of sedatives and analgesics |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a local ICU sedation guideline on goal-directed administration of sedatives and analgesics |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a local ICU sedation guideline on goal-directed administration of sedatives and analgesics |
title_short | Evaluation of a local ICU sedation guideline on goal-directed administration of sedatives and analgesics |
title_sort | evaluation of a local icu sedation guideline on goal-directed administration of sedatives and analgesics |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3100227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21647216 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S18161 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT degradojeremyr evaluationofalocalicusedationguidelineongoaldirectedadministrationofsedativesandanalgesics AT angerkevine evaluationofalocalicusedationguidelineongoaldirectedadministrationofsedativesandanalgesics AT szumitapaulm evaluationofalocalicusedationguidelineongoaldirectedadministrationofsedativesandanalgesics AT piercecarold evaluationofalocalicusedationguidelineongoaldirectedadministrationofsedativesandanalgesics AT massaroanthonyf evaluationofalocalicusedationguidelineongoaldirectedadministrationofsedativesandanalgesics |