Cargando…

Estrogen receptor positive breast cancers and their association with environmental factors

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies to assess risk factors for breast cancer often do not differentiate between different types of breast cancers. We applied a general linear model to determine whether data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program on annual county level age-adjus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: St-Hilaire, Sophie, Mandal, Rakesh, Commendador, Amy, Mannel, Sylvio, Derryberry, DeWayne
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3100231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21569288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-10-32
_version_ 1782204164853465088
author St-Hilaire, Sophie
Mandal, Rakesh
Commendador, Amy
Mannel, Sylvio
Derryberry, DeWayne
author_facet St-Hilaire, Sophie
Mandal, Rakesh
Commendador, Amy
Mannel, Sylvio
Derryberry, DeWayne
author_sort St-Hilaire, Sophie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies to assess risk factors for breast cancer often do not differentiate between different types of breast cancers. We applied a general linear model to determine whether data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program on annual county level age-adjusted incidence rates of breast cancer with and without estrogen receptors (ER+ and ER-) were associated with environmental pollutants. RESULTS: Our final model explained approximately 38% of the variation in the rate of ER+ breast cancer. In contrast, we were only able to explain 14% of the variation in the rate of ER- breast cancer with the same set of environmental variables. Only ER+ breast cancers were positively associated with the EPA's estimated risk of cancer based on toxic air emissions and the proportion of agricultural land in a county. Meteorological variables, including short wave radiation, temperature, precipitation, and water vapor pressure, were also significantly associated with the rate of ER+ breast cancer, after controlling for age, race, premature mortality from heart disease, and unemployment rate. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings were consistent with what we expected, given the fact that many of the commonly used pesticides and air pollutants included in the EPA cancer risk score are classified as endocrine disruptors and ER+ breast cancers respond more strongly to estrogen than ER- breast cancers. The findings of this study suggest that ER+ and ER- breast cancers have different risk factors, which should be taken into consideration in future studies that seek to understand environmental risk factors for breast cancer.
format Text
id pubmed-3100231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31002312011-05-24 Estrogen receptor positive breast cancers and their association with environmental factors St-Hilaire, Sophie Mandal, Rakesh Commendador, Amy Mannel, Sylvio Derryberry, DeWayne Int J Health Geogr Research BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies to assess risk factors for breast cancer often do not differentiate between different types of breast cancers. We applied a general linear model to determine whether data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program on annual county level age-adjusted incidence rates of breast cancer with and without estrogen receptors (ER+ and ER-) were associated with environmental pollutants. RESULTS: Our final model explained approximately 38% of the variation in the rate of ER+ breast cancer. In contrast, we were only able to explain 14% of the variation in the rate of ER- breast cancer with the same set of environmental variables. Only ER+ breast cancers were positively associated with the EPA's estimated risk of cancer based on toxic air emissions and the proportion of agricultural land in a county. Meteorological variables, including short wave radiation, temperature, precipitation, and water vapor pressure, were also significantly associated with the rate of ER+ breast cancer, after controlling for age, race, premature mortality from heart disease, and unemployment rate. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings were consistent with what we expected, given the fact that many of the commonly used pesticides and air pollutants included in the EPA cancer risk score are classified as endocrine disruptors and ER+ breast cancers respond more strongly to estrogen than ER- breast cancers. The findings of this study suggest that ER+ and ER- breast cancers have different risk factors, which should be taken into consideration in future studies that seek to understand environmental risk factors for breast cancer. BioMed Central 2011-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3100231/ /pubmed/21569288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-10-32 Text en Copyright ©2011 St-Hilaire et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
St-Hilaire, Sophie
Mandal, Rakesh
Commendador, Amy
Mannel, Sylvio
Derryberry, DeWayne
Estrogen receptor positive breast cancers and their association with environmental factors
title Estrogen receptor positive breast cancers and their association with environmental factors
title_full Estrogen receptor positive breast cancers and their association with environmental factors
title_fullStr Estrogen receptor positive breast cancers and their association with environmental factors
title_full_unstemmed Estrogen receptor positive breast cancers and their association with environmental factors
title_short Estrogen receptor positive breast cancers and their association with environmental factors
title_sort estrogen receptor positive breast cancers and their association with environmental factors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3100231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21569288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-10-32
work_keys_str_mv AT sthilairesophie estrogenreceptorpositivebreastcancersandtheirassociationwithenvironmentalfactors
AT mandalrakesh estrogenreceptorpositivebreastcancersandtheirassociationwithenvironmentalfactors
AT commendadoramy estrogenreceptorpositivebreastcancersandtheirassociationwithenvironmentalfactors
AT mannelsylvio estrogenreceptorpositivebreastcancersandtheirassociationwithenvironmentalfactors
AT derryberrydewayne estrogenreceptorpositivebreastcancersandtheirassociationwithenvironmentalfactors