Cargando…
Mythical Thinking, Scientific Discourses and Research Dissemination
This article focuses on some principles for understanding. By taking Anna Mikulak’s article “Mismatches between ‘scientific’ and ‘non-scientific’ ways of knowing and their contributions to public understanding of science” (IPBS 2011) as a point of departure, the idea of demarcation criteria for scie...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3100503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21461605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12124-011-9160-0 |
_version_ | 1782204192332447744 |
---|---|
author | Hroar Klempe, Sven |
author_facet | Hroar Klempe, Sven |
author_sort | Hroar Klempe, Sven |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article focuses on some principles for understanding. By taking Anna Mikulak’s article “Mismatches between ‘scientific’ and ‘non-scientific’ ways of knowing and their contributions to public understanding of science” (IPBS 2011) as a point of departure, the idea of demarcation criteria for scientific and non-scientific discourses is addressed. Yet this is juxtaposed with mythical thinking, which is supposed to be the most salient trait of non-scientific discourses. The author demonstrates how the most widespread demarcation criterion, the criterion of verification, is self-contradictory, not only when it comes to logic, but also in the achievement of isolating natural sciences from other forms of knowledge. According to Aristotle induction is a rhetorical device and as far as scientific statements are based on inductive inferences, they are relying on humanities, which rhetoric is a part of. Yet induction also has an empirical component by being based on sense-impressions, which is not a part of the rhetoric, but the psychology. Also the myths are understood in a rhetorical (Lévi-Strauss) and a psychological (Cassirer) perspective. Thus it is argued that both scientific and non-scientific discourses can be mythical. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3100503 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31005032011-07-14 Mythical Thinking, Scientific Discourses and Research Dissemination Hroar Klempe, Sven Integr Psychol Behav Sci Regular Paper This article focuses on some principles for understanding. By taking Anna Mikulak’s article “Mismatches between ‘scientific’ and ‘non-scientific’ ways of knowing and their contributions to public understanding of science” (IPBS 2011) as a point of departure, the idea of demarcation criteria for scientific and non-scientific discourses is addressed. Yet this is juxtaposed with mythical thinking, which is supposed to be the most salient trait of non-scientific discourses. The author demonstrates how the most widespread demarcation criterion, the criterion of verification, is self-contradictory, not only when it comes to logic, but also in the achievement of isolating natural sciences from other forms of knowledge. According to Aristotle induction is a rhetorical device and as far as scientific statements are based on inductive inferences, they are relying on humanities, which rhetoric is a part of. Yet induction also has an empirical component by being based on sense-impressions, which is not a part of the rhetoric, but the psychology. Also the myths are understood in a rhetorical (Lévi-Strauss) and a psychological (Cassirer) perspective. Thus it is argued that both scientific and non-scientific discourses can be mythical. Springer-Verlag 2011-04-02 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3100503/ /pubmed/21461605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12124-011-9160-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Regular Paper Hroar Klempe, Sven Mythical Thinking, Scientific Discourses and Research Dissemination |
title | Mythical Thinking, Scientific Discourses and Research Dissemination |
title_full | Mythical Thinking, Scientific Discourses and Research Dissemination |
title_fullStr | Mythical Thinking, Scientific Discourses and Research Dissemination |
title_full_unstemmed | Mythical Thinking, Scientific Discourses and Research Dissemination |
title_short | Mythical Thinking, Scientific Discourses and Research Dissemination |
title_sort | mythical thinking, scientific discourses and research dissemination |
topic | Regular Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3100503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21461605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12124-011-9160-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hroarklempesven mythicalthinkingscientificdiscoursesandresearchdissemination |