Cargando…
Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Q statistics
BACKGROUND: Clinical researchers have often preferred to use a fixed effects model for the primary interpretation of a meta-analysis. Heterogeneity is usually assessed via the well known Q and I(2) statistics, along with the random effects estimate they imply. In recent years, alternative methods fo...
Autores principales: | Bowden, Jack, Tierney, Jayne F, Copas, Andrew J, Burdett, Sarah |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3102034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21473747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-41 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random-effects meta-analysis using generalised heterogeneity statistics: should we use unequal tails?
por: Jackson, Dan, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
The statistical properties of RCTs and a proposal for shrinkage
por: van Zwet, Erik, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Statistical and methodological considerations for reporting RCTs in medical literature
por: Lee, Sangseok, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Tocilizumab in addition to standard of care in the management of COVID-19: a meta-analysis of RCTs
por: Mutua, Victor, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Should Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Be Considered for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Wild Type EGFR? Two Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Randomized Trials()
por: Vale, Claire L., et al.
Publicado: (2015)