Cargando…

Quantifying Water-Mediated Protein–Ligand Interactions in a Glutamate Receptor: A DFT Study

[Image: see text] It is becoming increasingly clear that careful treatment of water molecules in ligand–protein interactions is required in many cases if the correct binding pose is to be identified in molecular docking. Water can form complex bridging networks and can play a critical role in dictat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sahai, Michelle A., Biggin, Philip C.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2011
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3102440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21545106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp200776t
_version_ 1782204372651868160
author Sahai, Michelle A.
Biggin, Philip C.
author_facet Sahai, Michelle A.
Biggin, Philip C.
author_sort Sahai, Michelle A.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] It is becoming increasingly clear that careful treatment of water molecules in ligand–protein interactions is required in many cases if the correct binding pose is to be identified in molecular docking. Water can form complex bridging networks and can play a critical role in dictating the binding mode of ligands. A particularly striking example of this can be found in the ionotropic glutamate receptors. Despite possessing similar chemical moieties, crystal structures of glutamate and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA) in complex with the ligand-binding core of the GluA2 ionotropic glutamate receptor revealed, contrary to all expectation, two distinct modes of binding. The difference appears to be related to the position of water molecules within the binding pocket. However, it is unclear exactly what governs the preference for water molecules to occupy a particular site in any one binding mode. In this work we use density functional theory (DFT) calculations to investigate the interaction energies and polarization effects of the various components of the binding pocket. Our results show (i) the energetics of a key water molecule are more favorable for the site found in the glutamate-bound mode compared to the alternative site observed in the AMPA-bound mode, (ii) polarization effects are important for glutamate but less so for AMPA, (iii) ligand–system interaction energies alone can predict the correct binding mode for glutamate, but for AMPA alternative modes of binding have similar interaction energies, and (iv) the internal energy is a significant factor for AMPA but not for glutamate. We discuss the results within the broader context of rational drug-design.
format Text
id pubmed-3102440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31024402011-05-26 Quantifying Water-Mediated Protein–Ligand Interactions in a Glutamate Receptor: A DFT Study Sahai, Michelle A. Biggin, Philip C. J Phys Chem B [Image: see text] It is becoming increasingly clear that careful treatment of water molecules in ligand–protein interactions is required in many cases if the correct binding pose is to be identified in molecular docking. Water can form complex bridging networks and can play a critical role in dictating the binding mode of ligands. A particularly striking example of this can be found in the ionotropic glutamate receptors. Despite possessing similar chemical moieties, crystal structures of glutamate and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA) in complex with the ligand-binding core of the GluA2 ionotropic glutamate receptor revealed, contrary to all expectation, two distinct modes of binding. The difference appears to be related to the position of water molecules within the binding pocket. However, it is unclear exactly what governs the preference for water molecules to occupy a particular site in any one binding mode. In this work we use density functional theory (DFT) calculations to investigate the interaction energies and polarization effects of the various components of the binding pocket. Our results show (i) the energetics of a key water molecule are more favorable for the site found in the glutamate-bound mode compared to the alternative site observed in the AMPA-bound mode, (ii) polarization effects are important for glutamate but less so for AMPA, (iii) ligand–system interaction energies alone can predict the correct binding mode for glutamate, but for AMPA alternative modes of binding have similar interaction energies, and (iv) the internal energy is a significant factor for AMPA but not for glutamate. We discuss the results within the broader context of rational drug-design. American Chemical Society 2011-05-05 2011-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3102440/ /pubmed/21545106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp200776t Text en Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society http://pubs.acs.org This is an open-access article distributed under the ACS AuthorChoice Terms & Conditions. Any use of this article, must conform to the terms of that license which are available at http://pubs.acs.org.
spellingShingle Sahai, Michelle A.
Biggin, Philip C.
Quantifying Water-Mediated Protein–Ligand Interactions in a Glutamate Receptor: A DFT Study
title Quantifying Water-Mediated Protein–Ligand Interactions in a Glutamate Receptor: A DFT Study
title_full Quantifying Water-Mediated Protein–Ligand Interactions in a Glutamate Receptor: A DFT Study
title_fullStr Quantifying Water-Mediated Protein–Ligand Interactions in a Glutamate Receptor: A DFT Study
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying Water-Mediated Protein–Ligand Interactions in a Glutamate Receptor: A DFT Study
title_short Quantifying Water-Mediated Protein–Ligand Interactions in a Glutamate Receptor: A DFT Study
title_sort quantifying water-mediated protein–ligand interactions in a glutamate receptor: a dft study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3102440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21545106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp200776t
work_keys_str_mv AT sahaimichellea quantifyingwatermediatedproteinligandinteractionsinaglutamatereceptoradftstudy
AT bigginphilipc quantifyingwatermediatedproteinligandinteractionsinaglutamatereceptoradftstudy