Cargando…

Voice analysis after cancer treatment with organ preservation

BACKGROUND: This cross-sectional study objects to measure, subjectively and objectively, the voice and life quality of patients with oral cavity, pharyngeal and laryngeal cancer, after organ-preservation treatment. METHODS: 25 cases diagnosed and treated at a high complexity oncology center in south...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campos, Renata JDS, Maciel, Cristina TV, Cesca, Marcelle G, Leite, Isabel CG
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3102640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21504618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-3-19
_version_ 1782204400113025024
author Campos, Renata JDS
Maciel, Cristina TV
Cesca, Marcelle G
Leite, Isabel CG
author_facet Campos, Renata JDS
Maciel, Cristina TV
Cesca, Marcelle G
Leite, Isabel CG
author_sort Campos, Renata JDS
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This cross-sectional study objects to measure, subjectively and objectively, the voice and life quality of patients with oral cavity, pharyngeal and laryngeal cancer, after organ-preservation treatment. METHODS: 25 cases diagnosed and treated at a high complexity oncology center in southeastern Brazil. All had oral cavity, pharyngeal or laryngeal cancer, with a therapeutic proposal of radiotherapy alone or simultaneous radiochemotherapy. Acoustic voice analysis and the Voice Handicap Index protocol were used to measure voice quality. The data were analyzed through the χ2, Student's t and Kruskal Wallis tests. Significance level was 5%. RESULTS: After treatment, 40% complained of hoarseness, 56% complained of throat clearing, and no patient reported aphonia. On the voice quality auditory scale, 36% had moderate dysphonia. Acoustic voice analysis ranged from 184 to 221 Hz in females, and from 92 to 241 Hz in males. As for quality of life, most patients had mild physical, functional and emotional handicaps. CONCLUSIONS: Chemio-radiation organ preservation protocols in the patients studied may leave the organ but with reduced function which brings communication sequelae. In such cases, voice assessment and quality of life protocols, as well as speech therapy rehabilitation, are important tools to preserve function, measure and treat alterations, and reintegrate patients into the community.
format Text
id pubmed-3102640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31026402011-05-27 Voice analysis after cancer treatment with organ preservation Campos, Renata JDS Maciel, Cristina TV Cesca, Marcelle G Leite, Isabel CG Head Neck Oncol Research BACKGROUND: This cross-sectional study objects to measure, subjectively and objectively, the voice and life quality of patients with oral cavity, pharyngeal and laryngeal cancer, after organ-preservation treatment. METHODS: 25 cases diagnosed and treated at a high complexity oncology center in southeastern Brazil. All had oral cavity, pharyngeal or laryngeal cancer, with a therapeutic proposal of radiotherapy alone or simultaneous radiochemotherapy. Acoustic voice analysis and the Voice Handicap Index protocol were used to measure voice quality. The data were analyzed through the χ2, Student's t and Kruskal Wallis tests. Significance level was 5%. RESULTS: After treatment, 40% complained of hoarseness, 56% complained of throat clearing, and no patient reported aphonia. On the voice quality auditory scale, 36% had moderate dysphonia. Acoustic voice analysis ranged from 184 to 221 Hz in females, and from 92 to 241 Hz in males. As for quality of life, most patients had mild physical, functional and emotional handicaps. CONCLUSIONS: Chemio-radiation organ preservation protocols in the patients studied may leave the organ but with reduced function which brings communication sequelae. In such cases, voice assessment and quality of life protocols, as well as speech therapy rehabilitation, are important tools to preserve function, measure and treat alterations, and reintegrate patients into the community. BioMed Central 2011-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3102640/ /pubmed/21504618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-3-19 Text en Copyright ©2011 Campos et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Campos, Renata JDS
Maciel, Cristina TV
Cesca, Marcelle G
Leite, Isabel CG
Voice analysis after cancer treatment with organ preservation
title Voice analysis after cancer treatment with organ preservation
title_full Voice analysis after cancer treatment with organ preservation
title_fullStr Voice analysis after cancer treatment with organ preservation
title_full_unstemmed Voice analysis after cancer treatment with organ preservation
title_short Voice analysis after cancer treatment with organ preservation
title_sort voice analysis after cancer treatment with organ preservation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3102640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21504618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-3-19
work_keys_str_mv AT camposrenatajds voiceanalysisaftercancertreatmentwithorganpreservation
AT macielcristinatv voiceanalysisaftercancertreatmentwithorganpreservation
AT cescamarcelleg voiceanalysisaftercancertreatmentwithorganpreservation
AT leiteisabelcg voiceanalysisaftercancertreatmentwithorganpreservation