Cargando…
Voice analysis after cancer treatment with organ preservation
BACKGROUND: This cross-sectional study objects to measure, subjectively and objectively, the voice and life quality of patients with oral cavity, pharyngeal and laryngeal cancer, after organ-preservation treatment. METHODS: 25 cases diagnosed and treated at a high complexity oncology center in south...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3102640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21504618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-3-19 |
_version_ | 1782204400113025024 |
---|---|
author | Campos, Renata JDS Maciel, Cristina TV Cesca, Marcelle G Leite, Isabel CG |
author_facet | Campos, Renata JDS Maciel, Cristina TV Cesca, Marcelle G Leite, Isabel CG |
author_sort | Campos, Renata JDS |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This cross-sectional study objects to measure, subjectively and objectively, the voice and life quality of patients with oral cavity, pharyngeal and laryngeal cancer, after organ-preservation treatment. METHODS: 25 cases diagnosed and treated at a high complexity oncology center in southeastern Brazil. All had oral cavity, pharyngeal or laryngeal cancer, with a therapeutic proposal of radiotherapy alone or simultaneous radiochemotherapy. Acoustic voice analysis and the Voice Handicap Index protocol were used to measure voice quality. The data were analyzed through the χ2, Student's t and Kruskal Wallis tests. Significance level was 5%. RESULTS: After treatment, 40% complained of hoarseness, 56% complained of throat clearing, and no patient reported aphonia. On the voice quality auditory scale, 36% had moderate dysphonia. Acoustic voice analysis ranged from 184 to 221 Hz in females, and from 92 to 241 Hz in males. As for quality of life, most patients had mild physical, functional and emotional handicaps. CONCLUSIONS: Chemio-radiation organ preservation protocols in the patients studied may leave the organ but with reduced function which brings communication sequelae. In such cases, voice assessment and quality of life protocols, as well as speech therapy rehabilitation, are important tools to preserve function, measure and treat alterations, and reintegrate patients into the community. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3102640 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31026402011-05-27 Voice analysis after cancer treatment with organ preservation Campos, Renata JDS Maciel, Cristina TV Cesca, Marcelle G Leite, Isabel CG Head Neck Oncol Research BACKGROUND: This cross-sectional study objects to measure, subjectively and objectively, the voice and life quality of patients with oral cavity, pharyngeal and laryngeal cancer, after organ-preservation treatment. METHODS: 25 cases diagnosed and treated at a high complexity oncology center in southeastern Brazil. All had oral cavity, pharyngeal or laryngeal cancer, with a therapeutic proposal of radiotherapy alone or simultaneous radiochemotherapy. Acoustic voice analysis and the Voice Handicap Index protocol were used to measure voice quality. The data were analyzed through the χ2, Student's t and Kruskal Wallis tests. Significance level was 5%. RESULTS: After treatment, 40% complained of hoarseness, 56% complained of throat clearing, and no patient reported aphonia. On the voice quality auditory scale, 36% had moderate dysphonia. Acoustic voice analysis ranged from 184 to 221 Hz in females, and from 92 to 241 Hz in males. As for quality of life, most patients had mild physical, functional and emotional handicaps. CONCLUSIONS: Chemio-radiation organ preservation protocols in the patients studied may leave the organ but with reduced function which brings communication sequelae. In such cases, voice assessment and quality of life protocols, as well as speech therapy rehabilitation, are important tools to preserve function, measure and treat alterations, and reintegrate patients into the community. BioMed Central 2011-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3102640/ /pubmed/21504618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-3-19 Text en Copyright ©2011 Campos et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Campos, Renata JDS Maciel, Cristina TV Cesca, Marcelle G Leite, Isabel CG Voice analysis after cancer treatment with organ preservation |
title | Voice analysis after cancer treatment with organ preservation |
title_full | Voice analysis after cancer treatment with organ preservation |
title_fullStr | Voice analysis after cancer treatment with organ preservation |
title_full_unstemmed | Voice analysis after cancer treatment with organ preservation |
title_short | Voice analysis after cancer treatment with organ preservation |
title_sort | voice analysis after cancer treatment with organ preservation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3102640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21504618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-3-19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT camposrenatajds voiceanalysisaftercancertreatmentwithorganpreservation AT macielcristinatv voiceanalysisaftercancertreatmentwithorganpreservation AT cescamarcelleg voiceanalysisaftercancertreatmentwithorganpreservation AT leiteisabelcg voiceanalysisaftercancertreatmentwithorganpreservation |