Cargando…

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in the Circulation in Cancer Patients May Not Be a Relevant Biomarker

BACKGROUND: Levels of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) have widely been used as biomarker for angiogenic activity in cancer. For this purpose, non-standardized measurements in plasma and serum were used, without correction for artificial VEGF release by platelets activated ex vi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niers, Tatjana M. H., Richel, Dick J., Meijers, Joost C. M., Schlingemann, Reinier O.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3102663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21637343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019873
_version_ 1782204404407992320
author Niers, Tatjana M. H.
Richel, Dick J.
Meijers, Joost C. M.
Schlingemann, Reinier O.
author_facet Niers, Tatjana M. H.
Richel, Dick J.
Meijers, Joost C. M.
Schlingemann, Reinier O.
author_sort Niers, Tatjana M. H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Levels of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) have widely been used as biomarker for angiogenic activity in cancer. For this purpose, non-standardized measurements in plasma and serum were used, without correction for artificial VEGF release by platelets activated ex vivo. We hypothesize that “true” circulating (c)VEGF levels in most cancer patients are low and unrelated to cancer load or tumour angiogenesis. METHODOLOGY: We determined VEGF levels in PECT, a medium that contains platelet activation inhibitors, in citrate plasma, and in isolated platelets in 16 healthy subjects, 18 patients with metastatic non-renal cancer (non-RCC) and 12 patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In non-RCC patients, circulating plasma VEGF levels were low and similar to VEGF levels in controls if platelet activation was minimized during the harvest procedure by PECT medium. In citrate plasma, VEGF levels were elevated in non-RCC patients, but this could be explained by a combination of increased platelet activation during blood harvesting, and by a two-fold increase in VEGF content of individual platelets (controls: 3.4 IU/10(6), non-RCC: 6.2 IU/10(6) platelets, p = 0.001). In contrast, cVEGF levels in RCC patients were elevated (PECT plasma: 64 pg/ml vs. 21 pg/ml, RCC vs. non-RCC, p<0.0001), and not related to platelet VEGF concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that “true” freely cVEGF levels are not elevated in the majority of cancer patients. Previously reported elevated plasma VEGF levels in cancer appear to be due to artificial release from activated platelets, which in cancer have an increased VEGF content, during the blood harvest procedure. Only in patients with RCC, which is characterized by excessive VEGF production due to a specific genetic defect, were cVEGF levels elevated. This observation may be related to limited and selective success of anti-VEGF agents, such as bevacizumab and sorafenib, as monotherapy in RCC compared to other forms of cancer.
format Text
id pubmed-3102663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31026632011-06-02 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in the Circulation in Cancer Patients May Not Be a Relevant Biomarker Niers, Tatjana M. H. Richel, Dick J. Meijers, Joost C. M. Schlingemann, Reinier O. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Levels of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) have widely been used as biomarker for angiogenic activity in cancer. For this purpose, non-standardized measurements in plasma and serum were used, without correction for artificial VEGF release by platelets activated ex vivo. We hypothesize that “true” circulating (c)VEGF levels in most cancer patients are low and unrelated to cancer load or tumour angiogenesis. METHODOLOGY: We determined VEGF levels in PECT, a medium that contains platelet activation inhibitors, in citrate plasma, and in isolated platelets in 16 healthy subjects, 18 patients with metastatic non-renal cancer (non-RCC) and 12 patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In non-RCC patients, circulating plasma VEGF levels were low and similar to VEGF levels in controls if platelet activation was minimized during the harvest procedure by PECT medium. In citrate plasma, VEGF levels were elevated in non-RCC patients, but this could be explained by a combination of increased platelet activation during blood harvesting, and by a two-fold increase in VEGF content of individual platelets (controls: 3.4 IU/10(6), non-RCC: 6.2 IU/10(6) platelets, p = 0.001). In contrast, cVEGF levels in RCC patients were elevated (PECT plasma: 64 pg/ml vs. 21 pg/ml, RCC vs. non-RCC, p<0.0001), and not related to platelet VEGF concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that “true” freely cVEGF levels are not elevated in the majority of cancer patients. Previously reported elevated plasma VEGF levels in cancer appear to be due to artificial release from activated platelets, which in cancer have an increased VEGF content, during the blood harvest procedure. Only in patients with RCC, which is characterized by excessive VEGF production due to a specific genetic defect, were cVEGF levels elevated. This observation may be related to limited and selective success of anti-VEGF agents, such as bevacizumab and sorafenib, as monotherapy in RCC compared to other forms of cancer. Public Library of Science 2011-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3102663/ /pubmed/21637343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019873 Text en Niers et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Niers, Tatjana M. H.
Richel, Dick J.
Meijers, Joost C. M.
Schlingemann, Reinier O.
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in the Circulation in Cancer Patients May Not Be a Relevant Biomarker
title Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in the Circulation in Cancer Patients May Not Be a Relevant Biomarker
title_full Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in the Circulation in Cancer Patients May Not Be a Relevant Biomarker
title_fullStr Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in the Circulation in Cancer Patients May Not Be a Relevant Biomarker
title_full_unstemmed Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in the Circulation in Cancer Patients May Not Be a Relevant Biomarker
title_short Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in the Circulation in Cancer Patients May Not Be a Relevant Biomarker
title_sort vascular endothelial growth factor in the circulation in cancer patients may not be a relevant biomarker
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3102663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21637343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019873
work_keys_str_mv AT nierstatjanamh vascularendothelialgrowthfactorinthecirculationincancerpatientsmaynotbearelevantbiomarker
AT richeldickj vascularendothelialgrowthfactorinthecirculationincancerpatientsmaynotbearelevantbiomarker
AT meijersjoostcm vascularendothelialgrowthfactorinthecirculationincancerpatientsmaynotbearelevantbiomarker
AT schlingemannreiniero vascularendothelialgrowthfactorinthecirculationincancerpatientsmaynotbearelevantbiomarker