Cargando…

Screening with OGTT alone or in combination with the Indian diabetes risk score or genotyping of TCF7L2 to detect undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in Asian Indians

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: With increasing number of people with diabetes worldwide, particularly in India, it is necessary to search for low cost screening methods. We compared the effectiveness and costs of screening for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), using oral glucose tolerance t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohan, V., Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D., Radha, V., Gokulakrishnan, K.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3103154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21441683
_version_ 1782204488668413952
author Mohan, V.
Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D.
Radha, V.
Gokulakrishnan, K.
author_facet Mohan, V.
Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D.
Radha, V.
Gokulakrishnan, K.
author_sort Mohan, V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: With increasing number of people with diabetes worldwide, particularly in India, it is necessary to search for low cost screening methods. We compared the effectiveness and costs of screening for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), using oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) alone, or following a positive result from the Indian Diabetes Risk Score (IDRS) or following a positive result from genotyping of the TCF7L2 polymorphisms in Asian Indians. METHODS: In subjects without known diabetes (n=961) recruited from the Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study (CURES), OGTT, IDRS, and genotyping of rs12255372 (G/T) and rs7903146(C/T) of TCF7L2 polymorphisms were done. IDRS includes four parameters: age, abdominal obesity, family history of T2DM and physical activity. RESULTS: OGTT identified 72 subjects with newly diagnosed diabetes (NDD), according to the World Health Organization criteria of fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl or a plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dl, 2 h after 75 g oral glucose load. IDRS screening (cut-off ≥ 60) yielded 413 positive subjects, which included 54 (75%) of the 72 NDD subjects identified by OGTT. Genotyping yielded 493 positive subjects which only included 36 (50%) of the 72 NDD subjects showing less discriminatory power. Screening with both SNPs missed 27 (37.5%) NDD subjects identified by IDRS. In contrast, IDRS missed only 9 (12.5%) of the NDD subjects identified by genotyping. Total screening cost for OGTT alone, or with IDRS were [Image: see text] 384,400 and 182,810 respectively. Comparing OGTT alone to IDRS followed by OGTT, the incremental cost per additional NDD subject detected by doing OGTT on everyone was [Image: see text] 11,199 ([Image: see text] 201,590 for detecting additional 18 NDD subjects). INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: For screening a population of subjects without diagnosed diabetes in India, a simple diabetes risk score is more effective and less expensive than genotyping or doing OGTT on the whole population.
format Text
id pubmed-3103154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31031542011-06-08 Screening with OGTT alone or in combination with the Indian diabetes risk score or genotyping of TCF7L2 to detect undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in Asian Indians Mohan, V. Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D. Radha, V. Gokulakrishnan, K. Indian J Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: With increasing number of people with diabetes worldwide, particularly in India, it is necessary to search for low cost screening methods. We compared the effectiveness and costs of screening for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), using oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) alone, or following a positive result from the Indian Diabetes Risk Score (IDRS) or following a positive result from genotyping of the TCF7L2 polymorphisms in Asian Indians. METHODS: In subjects without known diabetes (n=961) recruited from the Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study (CURES), OGTT, IDRS, and genotyping of rs12255372 (G/T) and rs7903146(C/T) of TCF7L2 polymorphisms were done. IDRS includes four parameters: age, abdominal obesity, family history of T2DM and physical activity. RESULTS: OGTT identified 72 subjects with newly diagnosed diabetes (NDD), according to the World Health Organization criteria of fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl or a plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dl, 2 h after 75 g oral glucose load. IDRS screening (cut-off ≥ 60) yielded 413 positive subjects, which included 54 (75%) of the 72 NDD subjects identified by OGTT. Genotyping yielded 493 positive subjects which only included 36 (50%) of the 72 NDD subjects showing less discriminatory power. Screening with both SNPs missed 27 (37.5%) NDD subjects identified by IDRS. In contrast, IDRS missed only 9 (12.5%) of the NDD subjects identified by genotyping. Total screening cost for OGTT alone, or with IDRS were [Image: see text] 384,400 and 182,810 respectively. Comparing OGTT alone to IDRS followed by OGTT, the incremental cost per additional NDD subject detected by doing OGTT on everyone was [Image: see text] 11,199 ([Image: see text] 201,590 for detecting additional 18 NDD subjects). INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: For screening a population of subjects without diagnosed diabetes in India, a simple diabetes risk score is more effective and less expensive than genotyping or doing OGTT on the whole population. Medknow Publications 2011-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3103154/ /pubmed/21441683 Text en © The Indian Journal of Medical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mohan, V.
Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D.
Radha, V.
Gokulakrishnan, K.
Screening with OGTT alone or in combination with the Indian diabetes risk score or genotyping of TCF7L2 to detect undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in Asian Indians
title Screening with OGTT alone or in combination with the Indian diabetes risk score or genotyping of TCF7L2 to detect undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in Asian Indians
title_full Screening with OGTT alone or in combination with the Indian diabetes risk score or genotyping of TCF7L2 to detect undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in Asian Indians
title_fullStr Screening with OGTT alone or in combination with the Indian diabetes risk score or genotyping of TCF7L2 to detect undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in Asian Indians
title_full_unstemmed Screening with OGTT alone or in combination with the Indian diabetes risk score or genotyping of TCF7L2 to detect undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in Asian Indians
title_short Screening with OGTT alone or in combination with the Indian diabetes risk score or genotyping of TCF7L2 to detect undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in Asian Indians
title_sort screening with ogtt alone or in combination with the indian diabetes risk score or genotyping of tcf7l2 to detect undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in asian indians
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3103154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21441683
work_keys_str_mv AT mohanv screeningwithogttaloneorincombinationwiththeindiandiabetesriskscoreorgenotypingoftcf7l2todetectundiagnosedtype2diabetesinasianindians
AT goldhaberfiebertjeremyd screeningwithogttaloneorincombinationwiththeindiandiabetesriskscoreorgenotypingoftcf7l2todetectundiagnosedtype2diabetesinasianindians
AT radhav screeningwithogttaloneorincombinationwiththeindiandiabetesriskscoreorgenotypingoftcf7l2todetectundiagnosedtype2diabetesinasianindians
AT gokulakrishnank screeningwithogttaloneorincombinationwiththeindiandiabetesriskscoreorgenotypingoftcf7l2todetectundiagnosedtype2diabetesinasianindians