Cargando…

Genomic breeding value prediction and QTL mapping of QTLMAS2010 data using Bayesian Methods

BACKGROUND: Bayesian methods allow prediction of genomic breeding values (GEBVs) using high-density single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) covering the whole genome with effective shrinkage of SNP effects using appropriate priors. In this study we applied a modification of the well-known BayesA and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Xiaochen, Habier, David, Fernando, Rohan L, Garrick, Dorian J, Dekkers, Jack CM
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3103198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21624169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-5-S3-S13
_version_ 1782204496937484288
author Sun, Xiaochen
Habier, David
Fernando, Rohan L
Garrick, Dorian J
Dekkers, Jack CM
author_facet Sun, Xiaochen
Habier, David
Fernando, Rohan L
Garrick, Dorian J
Dekkers, Jack CM
author_sort Sun, Xiaochen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bayesian methods allow prediction of genomic breeding values (GEBVs) using high-density single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) covering the whole genome with effective shrinkage of SNP effects using appropriate priors. In this study we applied a modification of the well-known BayesA and BayesB methods to estimate the proportion of SNPs with zero effects (π) and a common variance for non-zero effects. The method, termed BayesCπ, was used to predict the GEBVs of the last generation of the QTLMAS2010 data. The accuracy of GEBVs from various methods was estimated by the correlation with phenotypes in the last generation. The methods were BayesCPi and BayesB with different π values, both with and without polygenic effects, and best linear unbiased prediction using an animal model with a genomic or numerator relationship matrix. Positions of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) were identified based on the variances of GEBVs for windows of 10 consecutive SNPs. We also proposed a novel approach to set significance thresholds for claiming QTL in this specific case by using pedigree-based simulation of genotypes. All analyses were focused on detecting and evaluating QTL with additive effects. RESULTS: The accuracy of GEBVs was highest for BayesCπ, but the accuracy of BayesB with π equal to 0.99 was similar to that of BayesCπ. The accuracy of BayesB dropped with a decrease in π. Including polygenic effects into the model only had marginal effects on accuracy and bias of predictions. The number of QTL identified was 15 when based on a stringent 10% chromosome-wise threshold and increased to 21 when a 20% chromosome-wise threshold was used. CONCLUSIONS: The BayesCπ method without polygenic effects was identified to be the best method for the QTLMAS2010 dataset, because it had highest accuracy and least bias. The significance criterion based on variance of 10-SNP windows allowed detection of more than half of the QTL, with few false positives.
format Text
id pubmed-3103198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31031982011-05-28 Genomic breeding value prediction and QTL mapping of QTLMAS2010 data using Bayesian Methods Sun, Xiaochen Habier, David Fernando, Rohan L Garrick, Dorian J Dekkers, Jack CM BMC Proc Proceedings BACKGROUND: Bayesian methods allow prediction of genomic breeding values (GEBVs) using high-density single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) covering the whole genome with effective shrinkage of SNP effects using appropriate priors. In this study we applied a modification of the well-known BayesA and BayesB methods to estimate the proportion of SNPs with zero effects (π) and a common variance for non-zero effects. The method, termed BayesCπ, was used to predict the GEBVs of the last generation of the QTLMAS2010 data. The accuracy of GEBVs from various methods was estimated by the correlation with phenotypes in the last generation. The methods were BayesCPi and BayesB with different π values, both with and without polygenic effects, and best linear unbiased prediction using an animal model with a genomic or numerator relationship matrix. Positions of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) were identified based on the variances of GEBVs for windows of 10 consecutive SNPs. We also proposed a novel approach to set significance thresholds for claiming QTL in this specific case by using pedigree-based simulation of genotypes. All analyses were focused on detecting and evaluating QTL with additive effects. RESULTS: The accuracy of GEBVs was highest for BayesCπ, but the accuracy of BayesB with π equal to 0.99 was similar to that of BayesCπ. The accuracy of BayesB dropped with a decrease in π. Including polygenic effects into the model only had marginal effects on accuracy and bias of predictions. The number of QTL identified was 15 when based on a stringent 10% chromosome-wise threshold and increased to 21 when a 20% chromosome-wise threshold was used. CONCLUSIONS: The BayesCπ method without polygenic effects was identified to be the best method for the QTLMAS2010 dataset, because it had highest accuracy and least bias. The significance criterion based on variance of 10-SNP windows allowed detection of more than half of the QTL, with few false positives. BioMed Central 2011-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3103198/ /pubmed/21624169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-5-S3-S13 Text en Copyright ©2011 Sun et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Proceedings
Sun, Xiaochen
Habier, David
Fernando, Rohan L
Garrick, Dorian J
Dekkers, Jack CM
Genomic breeding value prediction and QTL mapping of QTLMAS2010 data using Bayesian Methods
title Genomic breeding value prediction and QTL mapping of QTLMAS2010 data using Bayesian Methods
title_full Genomic breeding value prediction and QTL mapping of QTLMAS2010 data using Bayesian Methods
title_fullStr Genomic breeding value prediction and QTL mapping of QTLMAS2010 data using Bayesian Methods
title_full_unstemmed Genomic breeding value prediction and QTL mapping of QTLMAS2010 data using Bayesian Methods
title_short Genomic breeding value prediction and QTL mapping of QTLMAS2010 data using Bayesian Methods
title_sort genomic breeding value prediction and qtl mapping of qtlmas2010 data using bayesian methods
topic Proceedings
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3103198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21624169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-5-S3-S13
work_keys_str_mv AT sunxiaochen genomicbreedingvaluepredictionandqtlmappingofqtlmas2010datausingbayesianmethods
AT habierdavid genomicbreedingvaluepredictionandqtlmappingofqtlmas2010datausingbayesianmethods
AT fernandorohanl genomicbreedingvaluepredictionandqtlmappingofqtlmas2010datausingbayesianmethods
AT garrickdorianj genomicbreedingvaluepredictionandqtlmappingofqtlmas2010datausingbayesianmethods
AT dekkersjackcm genomicbreedingvaluepredictionandqtlmappingofqtlmas2010datausingbayesianmethods