Cargando…

Genomic selection for QTL-MAS data using a trait-specific relationship matrix

BACKGROUND: The genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) of the young individuals in the XIV QTL-MAS workshop dataset were predicted by three methods: best linear unbiased prediction with a trait-specific marker-derived relationship matrix (TABLUP), ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Zhe, Ding, XiangDong, Liu, JianFeng, de Koning, Dirk-Jan, Zhang, Qin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3103200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21624171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-5-S3-S15
_version_ 1782204497405149184
author Zhang, Zhe
Ding, XiangDong
Liu, JianFeng
de Koning, Dirk-Jan
Zhang, Qin
author_facet Zhang, Zhe
Ding, XiangDong
Liu, JianFeng
de Koning, Dirk-Jan
Zhang, Qin
author_sort Zhang, Zhe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) of the young individuals in the XIV QTL-MAS workshop dataset were predicted by three methods: best linear unbiased prediction with a trait-specific marker-derived relationship matrix (TABLUP), ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction (RRBLUP), and BayesB. METHODS: The TABLUP method is identical to the conventional BLUP except that the numeric relationship matrix is replaced with a trait-specific marker-derived relationship matrix (TA). The TA matrix was constructed based on both marker genotypes and their estimated effects on the trait of interest. The marker effects were estimated in a reference population consisting of 2 326 individuals using RRBLUP and BayesB. The GEBV of individuals in the reference population as well as 900 young individuals were estimated using the three methods. Subsets of markers were selected to perform low-density marker genomic selection for TABLUP method. RESULTS: The correlations between GEBVs from different methods are over 0.95 in most scenarios. The correlations between BayesB using all markers and TABLUP using 200 or more selected markers to construct the TA matrix are higher than 0.98 in the candidate population. The accuracy of TABLUP is higher than 0.67 with 100 or more selected markers, which is nearly equal to the accuracy of BayesB with all markers. CONCLUSIONS: TABLUP method performed nearly equally to BayesB method with the common dataset. It also provides an alternative method to predict GEBV with low-density markers. TABLUP is therefore a promising method for genomic selection deserving further exploration.
format Text
id pubmed-3103200
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31032002011-05-28 Genomic selection for QTL-MAS data using a trait-specific relationship matrix Zhang, Zhe Ding, XiangDong Liu, JianFeng de Koning, Dirk-Jan Zhang, Qin BMC Proc Proceedings BACKGROUND: The genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) of the young individuals in the XIV QTL-MAS workshop dataset were predicted by three methods: best linear unbiased prediction with a trait-specific marker-derived relationship matrix (TABLUP), ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction (RRBLUP), and BayesB. METHODS: The TABLUP method is identical to the conventional BLUP except that the numeric relationship matrix is replaced with a trait-specific marker-derived relationship matrix (TA). The TA matrix was constructed based on both marker genotypes and their estimated effects on the trait of interest. The marker effects were estimated in a reference population consisting of 2 326 individuals using RRBLUP and BayesB. The GEBV of individuals in the reference population as well as 900 young individuals were estimated using the three methods. Subsets of markers were selected to perform low-density marker genomic selection for TABLUP method. RESULTS: The correlations between GEBVs from different methods are over 0.95 in most scenarios. The correlations between BayesB using all markers and TABLUP using 200 or more selected markers to construct the TA matrix are higher than 0.98 in the candidate population. The accuracy of TABLUP is higher than 0.67 with 100 or more selected markers, which is nearly equal to the accuracy of BayesB with all markers. CONCLUSIONS: TABLUP method performed nearly equally to BayesB method with the common dataset. It also provides an alternative method to predict GEBV with low-density markers. TABLUP is therefore a promising method for genomic selection deserving further exploration. BioMed Central 2011-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3103200/ /pubmed/21624171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-5-S3-S15 Text en Copyright ©2011 Zhang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Proceedings
Zhang, Zhe
Ding, XiangDong
Liu, JianFeng
de Koning, Dirk-Jan
Zhang, Qin
Genomic selection for QTL-MAS data using a trait-specific relationship matrix
title Genomic selection for QTL-MAS data using a trait-specific relationship matrix
title_full Genomic selection for QTL-MAS data using a trait-specific relationship matrix
title_fullStr Genomic selection for QTL-MAS data using a trait-specific relationship matrix
title_full_unstemmed Genomic selection for QTL-MAS data using a trait-specific relationship matrix
title_short Genomic selection for QTL-MAS data using a trait-specific relationship matrix
title_sort genomic selection for qtl-mas data using a trait-specific relationship matrix
topic Proceedings
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3103200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21624171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-5-S3-S15
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangzhe genomicselectionforqtlmasdatausingatraitspecificrelationshipmatrix
AT dingxiangdong genomicselectionforqtlmasdatausingatraitspecificrelationshipmatrix
AT liujianfeng genomicselectionforqtlmasdatausingatraitspecificrelationshipmatrix
AT dekoningdirkjan genomicselectionforqtlmasdatausingatraitspecificrelationshipmatrix
AT zhangqin genomicselectionforqtlmasdatausingatraitspecificrelationshipmatrix