Cargando…

Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials

BACKGROUND: Feedlot cattle in North America are routinely fed subtherapeutic levels of antimicrobials to prevent disease and improve the efficiency of growth. This practice has been shown to promote antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in subpopulations of intestinal microflora including Escherichia coli....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mirzaagha, Parasto, Louie, Marie, Sharma, Ranjana, Yanke, L Jay, Topp, Ed, McAllister, Tim A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3103423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21504594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-11-78
_version_ 1782204511264178176
author Mirzaagha, Parasto
Louie, Marie
Sharma, Ranjana
Yanke, L Jay
Topp, Ed
McAllister, Tim A
author_facet Mirzaagha, Parasto
Louie, Marie
Sharma, Ranjana
Yanke, L Jay
Topp, Ed
McAllister, Tim A
author_sort Mirzaagha, Parasto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Feedlot cattle in North America are routinely fed subtherapeutic levels of antimicrobials to prevent disease and improve the efficiency of growth. This practice has been shown to promote antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in subpopulations of intestinal microflora including Escherichia coli. To date, studies of AMR in feedlot production settings have rarely employed selective isolation, therefore yielding too few AMR isolates to enable characterization of the emergence and nature of AMR in E. coli as an indicator bacterium. E. coli isolates (n = 531) were recovered from 140 cattle that were housed (10 animals/pen) in 14 pens and received no dietary antimicrobials (control - 5 pens, CON), or were intermittently administered subtherapeutic levels of chlortetracycline (5 pens-T), chlortetracycline + sulfamethazine (4 pens-TS), or virginiamycin (5 pens-V) for two separate periods over a 9-month feeding period. Phenotype and genotype of the isolates were determined by susceptibility testing and pulsed field gel electrophoresis and distribution of characterized isolates among housed cattle reported. It was hypothesized that the feeding of subtherapeutic antibiotics would increase the isolation of distinct genotypes of AMR E. coli from cattle. RESULTS: Overall, patterns of antimicrobial resistance expressed by E. coli isolates did not change among diet groups (CON vs. antibiotic treatments), however; isolates obtained on selective plates (i.e., M(A),M(T)), exhibited multi-resistance to sulfamethoxazole and chloramphenicol more frequently when obtained from TS-fed steers than from other treatments. Antibiograms and PFGE patterns suggested that AMR E. coli were readily transferred among steers within pens. Most M(T )isolates possessed the tet(B) efflux gene (58.2, 53.5, 40.8, and 50.6% of isolates from CON, T, TS, and V steers, respectively) whereas among the M(A )(ampicillin-resistant) isolates, the tem1-like determinant was predominant (occurring in 50, 66.7, 80.3, and 100% of isolates from CON, T, TS, and V steers, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Factors other than, or in addition to subtherapeutic administration of antibiotics influence the establishment and transmission of AMR E. coli among feedlot cattle.
format Text
id pubmed-3103423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31034232011-05-28 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Mirzaagha, Parasto Louie, Marie Sharma, Ranjana Yanke, L Jay Topp, Ed McAllister, Tim A BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Feedlot cattle in North America are routinely fed subtherapeutic levels of antimicrobials to prevent disease and improve the efficiency of growth. This practice has been shown to promote antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in subpopulations of intestinal microflora including Escherichia coli. To date, studies of AMR in feedlot production settings have rarely employed selective isolation, therefore yielding too few AMR isolates to enable characterization of the emergence and nature of AMR in E. coli as an indicator bacterium. E. coli isolates (n = 531) were recovered from 140 cattle that were housed (10 animals/pen) in 14 pens and received no dietary antimicrobials (control - 5 pens, CON), or were intermittently administered subtherapeutic levels of chlortetracycline (5 pens-T), chlortetracycline + sulfamethazine (4 pens-TS), or virginiamycin (5 pens-V) for two separate periods over a 9-month feeding period. Phenotype and genotype of the isolates were determined by susceptibility testing and pulsed field gel electrophoresis and distribution of characterized isolates among housed cattle reported. It was hypothesized that the feeding of subtherapeutic antibiotics would increase the isolation of distinct genotypes of AMR E. coli from cattle. RESULTS: Overall, patterns of antimicrobial resistance expressed by E. coli isolates did not change among diet groups (CON vs. antibiotic treatments), however; isolates obtained on selective plates (i.e., M(A),M(T)), exhibited multi-resistance to sulfamethoxazole and chloramphenicol more frequently when obtained from TS-fed steers than from other treatments. Antibiograms and PFGE patterns suggested that AMR E. coli were readily transferred among steers within pens. Most M(T )isolates possessed the tet(B) efflux gene (58.2, 53.5, 40.8, and 50.6% of isolates from CON, T, TS, and V steers, respectively) whereas among the M(A )(ampicillin-resistant) isolates, the tem1-like determinant was predominant (occurring in 50, 66.7, 80.3, and 100% of isolates from CON, T, TS, and V steers, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Factors other than, or in addition to subtherapeutic administration of antibiotics influence the establishment and transmission of AMR E. coli among feedlot cattle. BioMed Central 2011-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3103423/ /pubmed/21504594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Text en Copyright ©2011 Mirzaagha et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mirzaagha, Parasto
Louie, Marie
Sharma, Ranjana
Yanke, L Jay
Topp, Ed
McAllister, Tim A
Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials
title Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials
title_full Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials
title_fullStr Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials
title_full_unstemmed Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials
title_short Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials
title_sort distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3103423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21504594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-11-78
work_keys_str_mv AT mirzaaghaparasto distributionandcharacterizationofampicillinandtetracyclineresistantescherichiacolifromfeedlotcattlefedsubtherapeuticantimicrobials
AT louiemarie distributionandcharacterizationofampicillinandtetracyclineresistantescherichiacolifromfeedlotcattlefedsubtherapeuticantimicrobials
AT sharmaranjana distributionandcharacterizationofampicillinandtetracyclineresistantescherichiacolifromfeedlotcattlefedsubtherapeuticantimicrobials
AT yankeljay distributionandcharacterizationofampicillinandtetracyclineresistantescherichiacolifromfeedlotcattlefedsubtherapeuticantimicrobials
AT topped distributionandcharacterizationofampicillinandtetracyclineresistantescherichiacolifromfeedlotcattlefedsubtherapeuticantimicrobials
AT mcallistertima distributionandcharacterizationofampicillinandtetracyclineresistantescherichiacolifromfeedlotcattlefedsubtherapeuticantimicrobials