Cargando…

The Reality in the Surveillance of Breast Cancer Survivors—Results of a Patient Survey

BACKGROUND: International guidelines for the surveillance of breast cancer patients recommend a minimized clinical follow-up including routine history and physical examination and regularly scheduled mammograms. However, the abandonment of scheduled follow-up examinations in breast cancer survivors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hans-Joachim, Stemmler, Dorit, Lässig, Petra, Stieber, Ingo, Bauerfeind, Steffen, Kahlert, Alexander, Fasching Peter, Wilhelm, Beckmann Matthias, Margrit, Glattes, Ursula, Goldmann-Posch, Verena, Hoffmann, Michael, Untch, Volker, Heinemann
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Libertas Academica 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3104718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21655369
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: International guidelines for the surveillance of breast cancer patients recommend a minimized clinical follow-up including routine history and physical examination and regularly scheduled mammograms. However, the abandonment of scheduled follow-up examinations in breast cancer survivors remains a contradiction to established follow-up guidelines for other solid tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report the patients’ view on the basis of a survey performed in two separate geographical areas in Germany. The questionnaires were sent out to 2.658 patients with a history of breast cancer. RESULTS: A total of 801 patients (30.1%) responded to the questionnaire. The results of the survey can be summarized in two major categories: First, necessity for surveillance was affirmed by a majority (>95%), and 47.8% of the organized patients answered that there was a need for more intensive diagnostic effort during follow-up. The main expectation from an intensified follow-up was the increased feeling of security as expressed by >80% of the women. Second, the present survey indicates that most of the regularly scheduled follow-up visits were expanded using extensive laboratory and imaging procedures exceeding the quantity of examinations recommended in the present follow-up guidelines. CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that only one third of the patients responded to the questionnaire, the survey indicates that a majority of physicians who treated these patients still do not accept the present follow-up guidelines. To some extent this may be explained by the observation that patients and possibly also their doctors trust that intensified follow-up increases diagnostic security and survival. Since considerable changes in the treatment options of breast cancer have been made during the last decades a new trial of investigations in follow-up is warranted.