Cargando…

Distribution of nuchal translucency in antenatal screening for Down's syndrome

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the standard deviation of nuchal translucency (NT) measurements has decreased over time and if so to revise the estimate and assess the effect of revising the estimate of the standard deviation on the performance of antenatal screening for Down's syndrome. SETTIN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bestwick, J P, Huttly, W J, Wald, N J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal Society of Medicine Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3104820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20356939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/jms.2010.009107
_version_ 1782204645484003328
author Bestwick, J P
Huttly, W J
Wald, N J
author_facet Bestwick, J P
Huttly, W J
Wald, N J
author_sort Bestwick, J P
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the standard deviation of nuchal translucency (NT) measurements has decreased over time and if so to revise the estimate and assess the effect of revising the estimate of the standard deviation on the performance of antenatal screening for Down's syndrome. SETTING: Data from a routine antenatal screening programme for Down's syndrome comprising 106 affected and 22,640 unaffected pregnancies. METHODS: NT measurements were converted into multiple of the median (MoM) values and standard deviations of log(10) MoM values were calculated in affected and unaffected pregnancies. The screening performance of the Combined and Integrated tests (that include NT measurement) were compared using previous and revised estimates of the standard deviation. RESULTS: The standard deviation of NT in unaffected pregnancies has reduced over time (from 1998 to 2008) (e.g. from 0.1329 to 0.1105 [log(10) MoM] at 12–13 completed weeks of pregnancy, reducing the variance by about 30%). This was not observed in affected pregnancies. Compared with results from the serum, urine and ultrasound screening study (SURUSS), use of the revised NT standard deviations in unaffected pregnancies resulted in an approximate 20% decrease in the false-positive rate for a given detection rate; for example, from 2.1% to 1.7% (a 19% reduction) at a 90% detection rate using the Integrated test with first trimester markers measured at 11 completed weeks' gestation and from 4.4% to 3.5% (a 20% reduction) at an 85% detection rate using the Combined test at 11 completed weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The standard deviation of NT has declined over time and using the revised estimates improves the screening performance of tests that incorporate an NT measurement.
format Text
id pubmed-3104820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Royal Society of Medicine Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31048202011-06-08 Distribution of nuchal translucency in antenatal screening for Down's syndrome Bestwick, J P Huttly, W J Wald, N J J Med Screen Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the standard deviation of nuchal translucency (NT) measurements has decreased over time and if so to revise the estimate and assess the effect of revising the estimate of the standard deviation on the performance of antenatal screening for Down's syndrome. SETTING: Data from a routine antenatal screening programme for Down's syndrome comprising 106 affected and 22,640 unaffected pregnancies. METHODS: NT measurements were converted into multiple of the median (MoM) values and standard deviations of log(10) MoM values were calculated in affected and unaffected pregnancies. The screening performance of the Combined and Integrated tests (that include NT measurement) were compared using previous and revised estimates of the standard deviation. RESULTS: The standard deviation of NT in unaffected pregnancies has reduced over time (from 1998 to 2008) (e.g. from 0.1329 to 0.1105 [log(10) MoM] at 12–13 completed weeks of pregnancy, reducing the variance by about 30%). This was not observed in affected pregnancies. Compared with results from the serum, urine and ultrasound screening study (SURUSS), use of the revised NT standard deviations in unaffected pregnancies resulted in an approximate 20% decrease in the false-positive rate for a given detection rate; for example, from 2.1% to 1.7% (a 19% reduction) at a 90% detection rate using the Integrated test with first trimester markers measured at 11 completed weeks' gestation and from 4.4% to 3.5% (a 20% reduction) at an 85% detection rate using the Combined test at 11 completed weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The standard deviation of NT has declined over time and using the revised estimates improves the screening performance of tests that incorporate an NT measurement. Royal Society of Medicine Press 2010-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3104820/ /pubmed/20356939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/jms.2010.009107 Text en Copyright http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bestwick, J P
Huttly, W J
Wald, N J
Distribution of nuchal translucency in antenatal screening for Down's syndrome
title Distribution of nuchal translucency in antenatal screening for Down's syndrome
title_full Distribution of nuchal translucency in antenatal screening for Down's syndrome
title_fullStr Distribution of nuchal translucency in antenatal screening for Down's syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Distribution of nuchal translucency in antenatal screening for Down's syndrome
title_short Distribution of nuchal translucency in antenatal screening for Down's syndrome
title_sort distribution of nuchal translucency in antenatal screening for down's syndrome
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3104820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20356939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/jms.2010.009107
work_keys_str_mv AT bestwickjp distributionofnuchaltranslucencyinantenatalscreeningfordownssyndrome
AT huttlywj distributionofnuchaltranslucencyinantenatalscreeningfordownssyndrome
AT waldnj distributionofnuchaltranslucencyinantenatalscreeningfordownssyndrome