Cargando…

Technical Variability Is Greater than Biological Variability in a Microarray Experiment but Both Are Outweighed by Changes Induced by Stimulation

INTRODUCTION: A central issue in the design of microarray-based analysis of global gene expression is that variability resulting from experimental processes may obscure changes resulting from the effect being investigated. This study quantified the variability in gene expression at each level of a t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bryant, Penelope A., Smyth, Gordon K., Robins-Browne, Roy, Curtis, Nigel
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3104982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21655321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019556
_version_ 1782204660926382080
author Bryant, Penelope A.
Smyth, Gordon K.
Robins-Browne, Roy
Curtis, Nigel
author_facet Bryant, Penelope A.
Smyth, Gordon K.
Robins-Browne, Roy
Curtis, Nigel
author_sort Bryant, Penelope A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A central issue in the design of microarray-based analysis of global gene expression is that variability resulting from experimental processes may obscure changes resulting from the effect being investigated. This study quantified the variability in gene expression at each level of a typical in vitro stimulation experiment using human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). The primary objective was to determine the magnitude of biological and technical variability relative to the effect being investigated, namely gene expression changes resulting from stimulation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). METHODS AND RESULTS: Human PBMC were stimulated in vitro with LPS, with replication at 5 levels: 5 subjects each on 2 separate days with technical replication of LPS stimulation, amplification and hybridisation. RNA from samples stimulated with LPS and unstimulated samples were hybridised against common reference RNA on oligonucleotide microarrays. There was a closer correlation in gene expression between replicate hybridisations (0.86–0.93) than between different subjects (0.66–0.78). Deconstruction of the variability at each level of the experimental process showed that technical variability (standard deviation (SD) 0.16) was greater than biological variability (SD 0.06), although both were low (SD<0.1 for all individual components). There was variability in gene expression both at baseline and after stimulation with LPS and proportion of cell subsets in PBMC was likely partly responsible for this. However, gene expression changes after stimulation with LPS were much greater than the variability from any source, either individually or combined. CONCLUSIONS: Variability in gene expression was very low and likely to improve further as technical advances are made. The finding that stimulation with LPS has a markedly greater effect on gene expression than the degree of variability provides confidence that microarray-based studies can be used to detect changes in gene expression of biological interest in infectious diseases.
format Text
id pubmed-3104982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31049822011-06-08 Technical Variability Is Greater than Biological Variability in a Microarray Experiment but Both Are Outweighed by Changes Induced by Stimulation Bryant, Penelope A. Smyth, Gordon K. Robins-Browne, Roy Curtis, Nigel PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: A central issue in the design of microarray-based analysis of global gene expression is that variability resulting from experimental processes may obscure changes resulting from the effect being investigated. This study quantified the variability in gene expression at each level of a typical in vitro stimulation experiment using human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). The primary objective was to determine the magnitude of biological and technical variability relative to the effect being investigated, namely gene expression changes resulting from stimulation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). METHODS AND RESULTS: Human PBMC were stimulated in vitro with LPS, with replication at 5 levels: 5 subjects each on 2 separate days with technical replication of LPS stimulation, amplification and hybridisation. RNA from samples stimulated with LPS and unstimulated samples were hybridised against common reference RNA on oligonucleotide microarrays. There was a closer correlation in gene expression between replicate hybridisations (0.86–0.93) than between different subjects (0.66–0.78). Deconstruction of the variability at each level of the experimental process showed that technical variability (standard deviation (SD) 0.16) was greater than biological variability (SD 0.06), although both were low (SD<0.1 for all individual components). There was variability in gene expression both at baseline and after stimulation with LPS and proportion of cell subsets in PBMC was likely partly responsible for this. However, gene expression changes after stimulation with LPS were much greater than the variability from any source, either individually or combined. CONCLUSIONS: Variability in gene expression was very low and likely to improve further as technical advances are made. The finding that stimulation with LPS has a markedly greater effect on gene expression than the degree of variability provides confidence that microarray-based studies can be used to detect changes in gene expression of biological interest in infectious diseases. Public Library of Science 2011-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3104982/ /pubmed/21655321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019556 Text en Bryant et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bryant, Penelope A.
Smyth, Gordon K.
Robins-Browne, Roy
Curtis, Nigel
Technical Variability Is Greater than Biological Variability in a Microarray Experiment but Both Are Outweighed by Changes Induced by Stimulation
title Technical Variability Is Greater than Biological Variability in a Microarray Experiment but Both Are Outweighed by Changes Induced by Stimulation
title_full Technical Variability Is Greater than Biological Variability in a Microarray Experiment but Both Are Outweighed by Changes Induced by Stimulation
title_fullStr Technical Variability Is Greater than Biological Variability in a Microarray Experiment but Both Are Outweighed by Changes Induced by Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Technical Variability Is Greater than Biological Variability in a Microarray Experiment but Both Are Outweighed by Changes Induced by Stimulation
title_short Technical Variability Is Greater than Biological Variability in a Microarray Experiment but Both Are Outweighed by Changes Induced by Stimulation
title_sort technical variability is greater than biological variability in a microarray experiment but both are outweighed by changes induced by stimulation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3104982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21655321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019556
work_keys_str_mv AT bryantpenelopea technicalvariabilityisgreaterthanbiologicalvariabilityinamicroarrayexperimentbutbothareoutweighedbychangesinducedbystimulation
AT smythgordonk technicalvariabilityisgreaterthanbiologicalvariabilityinamicroarrayexperimentbutbothareoutweighedbychangesinducedbystimulation
AT robinsbrowneroy technicalvariabilityisgreaterthanbiologicalvariabilityinamicroarrayexperimentbutbothareoutweighedbychangesinducedbystimulation
AT curtisnigel technicalvariabilityisgreaterthanbiologicalvariabilityinamicroarrayexperimentbutbothareoutweighedbychangesinducedbystimulation