Cargando…

Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Utilities and Limitations for Herbicide-Resistant Weed Management

Since 1996, genetically modified herbicide-resistant (HR) crops, particularly glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops, have transformed the tactics that corn, soybean, and cotton growers use to manage weeds. The use of GR crops continues to grow, but weeds are adapting to the common practice of using only g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Green, Jerry M., Owen, Micheal D. K.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2010
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3105486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20586458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf101286h
_version_ 1782204719572189184
author Green, Jerry M.
Owen, Micheal D. K.
author_facet Green, Jerry M.
Owen, Micheal D. K.
author_sort Green, Jerry M.
collection PubMed
description Since 1996, genetically modified herbicide-resistant (HR) crops, particularly glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops, have transformed the tactics that corn, soybean, and cotton growers use to manage weeds. The use of GR crops continues to grow, but weeds are adapting to the common practice of using only glyphosate to control weeds. Growers using only a single mode of action to manage weeds need to change to a more diverse array of herbicidal, mechanical, and cultural practices to maintain the effectiveness of glyphosate. Unfortunately, the introduction of GR crops and the high initial efficacy of glyphosate often lead to a decline in the use of other herbicide options and less investment by industry to discover new herbicide active ingredients. With some exceptions, most growers can still manage their weed problems with currently available selective and HR crop-enabled herbicides. However, current crop management systems are in jeopardy given the pace at which weed populations are evolving glyphosate resistance. New HR crop technologies will expand the utility of currently available herbicides and enable new interim solutions for growers to manage HR weeds, but will not replace the long-term need to diversify weed management tactics and discover herbicides with new modes of action. This paper reviews the strengths and weaknesses of anticipated weed management options and the best management practices that growers need to implement in HR crops to maximize the long-term benefits of current technologies and reduce weed shifts to difficult-to-control and HR weeds.
format Text
id pubmed-3105486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31054862011-06-01 Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Utilities and Limitations for Herbicide-Resistant Weed Management Green, Jerry M. Owen, Micheal D. K. J Agric Food Chem Since 1996, genetically modified herbicide-resistant (HR) crops, particularly glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops, have transformed the tactics that corn, soybean, and cotton growers use to manage weeds. The use of GR crops continues to grow, but weeds are adapting to the common practice of using only glyphosate to control weeds. Growers using only a single mode of action to manage weeds need to change to a more diverse array of herbicidal, mechanical, and cultural practices to maintain the effectiveness of glyphosate. Unfortunately, the introduction of GR crops and the high initial efficacy of glyphosate often lead to a decline in the use of other herbicide options and less investment by industry to discover new herbicide active ingredients. With some exceptions, most growers can still manage their weed problems with currently available selective and HR crop-enabled herbicides. However, current crop management systems are in jeopardy given the pace at which weed populations are evolving glyphosate resistance. New HR crop technologies will expand the utility of currently available herbicides and enable new interim solutions for growers to manage HR weeds, but will not replace the long-term need to diversify weed management tactics and discover herbicides with new modes of action. This paper reviews the strengths and weaknesses of anticipated weed management options and the best management practices that growers need to implement in HR crops to maximize the long-term benefits of current technologies and reduce weed shifts to difficult-to-control and HR weeds. American Chemical Society 2010-06-29 2011-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3105486/ /pubmed/20586458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf101286h Text en Copyright © 2010 American Chemical Society http://pubs.acs.org This is an open-access article distributed under the ACS AuthorChoice Terms & Conditions. Any use of this article, must conform to the terms of that license which are available at http://pubs.acs.org.
spellingShingle Green, Jerry M.
Owen, Micheal D. K.
Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Utilities and Limitations for Herbicide-Resistant Weed Management
title Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Utilities and Limitations for Herbicide-Resistant Weed Management
title_full Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Utilities and Limitations for Herbicide-Resistant Weed Management
title_fullStr Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Utilities and Limitations for Herbicide-Resistant Weed Management
title_full_unstemmed Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Utilities and Limitations for Herbicide-Resistant Weed Management
title_short Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Utilities and Limitations for Herbicide-Resistant Weed Management
title_sort herbicide-resistant crops: utilities and limitations for herbicide-resistant weed management
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3105486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20586458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf101286h
work_keys_str_mv AT greenjerrym herbicideresistantcropsutilitiesandlimitationsforherbicideresistantweedmanagement
AT owenmichealdk herbicideresistantcropsutilitiesandlimitationsforherbicideresistantweedmanagement