Cargando…

Forward suppression in the auditory cortex is frequency-specific

We investigated how physiologically observed forward suppression interacts with stimulus frequency in neuronal responses in the guinea pig auditory cortex. The temporal order and frequency proximity of sounds influence both their perception and neuronal responses. Psychophysically, preceding sounds...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scholes, Chris, Palmer, Alan R, Sumner, Christian J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21226777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07568.x
_version_ 1782205264527622144
author Scholes, Chris
Palmer, Alan R
Sumner, Christian J
author_facet Scholes, Chris
Palmer, Alan R
Sumner, Christian J
author_sort Scholes, Chris
collection PubMed
description We investigated how physiologically observed forward suppression interacts with stimulus frequency in neuronal responses in the guinea pig auditory cortex. The temporal order and frequency proximity of sounds influence both their perception and neuronal responses. Psychophysically, preceding sounds (conditioners) can make successive sounds (probes) harder to hear. These effects are larger when the two sounds are spectrally similar. Physiological forward suppression is usually maximal for conditioner tones near to a unit's characteristic frequency (CF), the frequency to which a neuron is most sensitive. However, in most physiological studies, the frequency of the probe tone and CF are identical, so the role of unit CF and probe frequency cannot be distinguished. Here, we systemically varied the frequency of the probe tone, and found that the tuning of suppression was often more closely related to the frequency of the probe tone than to the unit's CF, i.e. suppressed tuning was specific to probe frequency. This relationship was maintained for all measured gaps between the conditioner and the probe tones. However, when the probe frequency and CF were similar, CF tended to determine suppressed tuning. In addition, the bandwidth of suppression was slightly wider for off-CF probes. Changes in tuning were also reflected in the firing rate in response to probe tones, which was maximally reduced when probe and conditioner tones were matched in frequency. These data are consistent with the idea that cortical neurons receive convergent inputs with a wide range of tuning properties that can adapt independently.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3108068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31080682011-06-14 Forward suppression in the auditory cortex is frequency-specific Scholes, Chris Palmer, Alan R Sumner, Christian J Eur J Neurosci Neurosystems We investigated how physiologically observed forward suppression interacts with stimulus frequency in neuronal responses in the guinea pig auditory cortex. The temporal order and frequency proximity of sounds influence both their perception and neuronal responses. Psychophysically, preceding sounds (conditioners) can make successive sounds (probes) harder to hear. These effects are larger when the two sounds are spectrally similar. Physiological forward suppression is usually maximal for conditioner tones near to a unit's characteristic frequency (CF), the frequency to which a neuron is most sensitive. However, in most physiological studies, the frequency of the probe tone and CF are identical, so the role of unit CF and probe frequency cannot be distinguished. Here, we systemically varied the frequency of the probe tone, and found that the tuning of suppression was often more closely related to the frequency of the probe tone than to the unit's CF, i.e. suppressed tuning was specific to probe frequency. This relationship was maintained for all measured gaps between the conditioner and the probe tones. However, when the probe frequency and CF were similar, CF tended to determine suppressed tuning. In addition, the bandwidth of suppression was slightly wider for off-CF probes. Changes in tuning were also reflected in the firing rate in response to probe tones, which was maximally reduced when probe and conditioner tones were matched in frequency. These data are consistent with the idea that cortical neurons receive convergent inputs with a wide range of tuning properties that can adapt independently. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2011-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3108068/ /pubmed/21226777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07568.x Text en European Journal of Neuroscience © 2011 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and Blackwell Publishing Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Neurosystems
Scholes, Chris
Palmer, Alan R
Sumner, Christian J
Forward suppression in the auditory cortex is frequency-specific
title Forward suppression in the auditory cortex is frequency-specific
title_full Forward suppression in the auditory cortex is frequency-specific
title_fullStr Forward suppression in the auditory cortex is frequency-specific
title_full_unstemmed Forward suppression in the auditory cortex is frequency-specific
title_short Forward suppression in the auditory cortex is frequency-specific
title_sort forward suppression in the auditory cortex is frequency-specific
topic Neurosystems
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21226777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07568.x
work_keys_str_mv AT scholeschris forwardsuppressionintheauditorycortexisfrequencyspecific
AT palmeralanr forwardsuppressionintheauditorycortexisfrequencyspecific
AT sumnerchristianj forwardsuppressionintheauditorycortexisfrequencyspecific