Cargando…

Generation of Priority Research Questions to Inform Conservation Policy and Management at a National Level

Integrating knowledge from across the natural and social sciences is necessary to effectively address societal tradeoffs between human use of biological diversity and its preservation. Collaborative processes can change the ways decision makers think about scientific evidence, enhance levels of mutu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rudd, Murray A, Beazley, Karen F, Cooke, Steven J, Fleishman, Erica, Lane, Daniel E, Mascia, Michael B, Roth, Robin, Tabor, Gary, Bakker, Jiselle A, Bellefontaine, Teresa, Berteaux, Dominique, Cantin, Bernard, Chaulk, Keith G, Cunningham, Kathryn, Dobell, Rod, Fast, Eleanor, Ferrara, Nadia, Findlay, C Scott, Hallstrom, Lars K, Hammond, Thomas, Hermanutz, Luise, Hutchings, Jeffrey A, Lindsay, Kathryn E, Marta, Tim J, Nguyen, Vivian M, Northey, Greg, Prior, Kent, Ramirez-Sanchez, Saudiel, Rice, Jake, Sleep, Darren J H, Szabo, Nora D, Trottier, Geneviève, Toussaint, Jean-Patrick, Veilleux, Jean-Philippe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Inc 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21175828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01625.x
_version_ 1782205264750968832
author Rudd, Murray A
Beazley, Karen F
Cooke, Steven J
Fleishman, Erica
Lane, Daniel E
Mascia, Michael B
Roth, Robin
Tabor, Gary
Bakker, Jiselle A
Bellefontaine, Teresa
Berteaux, Dominique
Cantin, Bernard
Chaulk, Keith G
Cunningham, Kathryn
Dobell, Rod
Fast, Eleanor
Ferrara, Nadia
Findlay, C Scott
Hallstrom, Lars K
Hammond, Thomas
Hermanutz, Luise
Hutchings, Jeffrey A
Lindsay, Kathryn E
Marta, Tim J
Nguyen, Vivian M
Northey, Greg
Prior, Kent
Ramirez-Sanchez, Saudiel
Rice, Jake
Sleep, Darren J H
Szabo, Nora D
Trottier, Geneviève
Toussaint, Jean-Patrick
Veilleux, Jean-Philippe
author_facet Rudd, Murray A
Beazley, Karen F
Cooke, Steven J
Fleishman, Erica
Lane, Daniel E
Mascia, Michael B
Roth, Robin
Tabor, Gary
Bakker, Jiselle A
Bellefontaine, Teresa
Berteaux, Dominique
Cantin, Bernard
Chaulk, Keith G
Cunningham, Kathryn
Dobell, Rod
Fast, Eleanor
Ferrara, Nadia
Findlay, C Scott
Hallstrom, Lars K
Hammond, Thomas
Hermanutz, Luise
Hutchings, Jeffrey A
Lindsay, Kathryn E
Marta, Tim J
Nguyen, Vivian M
Northey, Greg
Prior, Kent
Ramirez-Sanchez, Saudiel
Rice, Jake
Sleep, Darren J H
Szabo, Nora D
Trottier, Geneviève
Toussaint, Jean-Patrick
Veilleux, Jean-Philippe
author_sort Rudd, Murray A
collection PubMed
description Integrating knowledge from across the natural and social sciences is necessary to effectively address societal tradeoffs between human use of biological diversity and its preservation. Collaborative processes can change the ways decision makers think about scientific evidence, enhance levels of mutual trust and credibility, and advance the conservation policy discourse. Canada has responsibility for a large fraction of some major ecosystems, such as boreal forests, Arctic tundra, wetlands, and temperate and Arctic oceans. Stressors to biological diversity within these ecosystems arise from activities of the country's resource-based economy, as well as external drivers of environmental change. Effective management is complicated by incongruence between ecological and political boundaries and conflicting perspectives on social and economic goals. Many knowledge gaps about stressors and their management might be reduced through targeted, timely research. We identify 40 questions that, if addressed or answered, would advance research that has a high probability of supporting development of effective policies and management strategies for species, ecosystems, and ecological processes in Canada. A total of 396 candidate questions drawn from natural and social science disciplines were contributed by individuals with diverse organizational affiliations. These were collaboratively winnowed to 40 by our team of collaborators. The questions emphasize understanding ecosystems, the effects and mitigation of climate change, coordinating governance and management efforts across multiple jurisdictions, and examining relations between conservation policy and the social and economic well-being of Aboriginal peoples. The questions we identified provide potential links between evidence from the conservation sciences and formulation of policies for conservation and resource management. Our collaborative process of communication and engagement between scientists and decision makers for generating and prioritizing research questions at a national level could be a model for similar efforts beyond Canada. Generación de Preguntas de Investigación Prioritarias para Informar a las Políticas y Gestión de la Conservación a Nivel Nacional
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3108069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Blackwell Publishing Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31080692011-06-14 Generation of Priority Research Questions to Inform Conservation Policy and Management at a National Level Rudd, Murray A Beazley, Karen F Cooke, Steven J Fleishman, Erica Lane, Daniel E Mascia, Michael B Roth, Robin Tabor, Gary Bakker, Jiselle A Bellefontaine, Teresa Berteaux, Dominique Cantin, Bernard Chaulk, Keith G Cunningham, Kathryn Dobell, Rod Fast, Eleanor Ferrara, Nadia Findlay, C Scott Hallstrom, Lars K Hammond, Thomas Hermanutz, Luise Hutchings, Jeffrey A Lindsay, Kathryn E Marta, Tim J Nguyen, Vivian M Northey, Greg Prior, Kent Ramirez-Sanchez, Saudiel Rice, Jake Sleep, Darren J H Szabo, Nora D Trottier, Geneviève Toussaint, Jean-Patrick Veilleux, Jean-Philippe Conserv Biol Contributed Papers Integrating knowledge from across the natural and social sciences is necessary to effectively address societal tradeoffs between human use of biological diversity and its preservation. Collaborative processes can change the ways decision makers think about scientific evidence, enhance levels of mutual trust and credibility, and advance the conservation policy discourse. Canada has responsibility for a large fraction of some major ecosystems, such as boreal forests, Arctic tundra, wetlands, and temperate and Arctic oceans. Stressors to biological diversity within these ecosystems arise from activities of the country's resource-based economy, as well as external drivers of environmental change. Effective management is complicated by incongruence between ecological and political boundaries and conflicting perspectives on social and economic goals. Many knowledge gaps about stressors and their management might be reduced through targeted, timely research. We identify 40 questions that, if addressed or answered, would advance research that has a high probability of supporting development of effective policies and management strategies for species, ecosystems, and ecological processes in Canada. A total of 396 candidate questions drawn from natural and social science disciplines were contributed by individuals with diverse organizational affiliations. These were collaboratively winnowed to 40 by our team of collaborators. The questions emphasize understanding ecosystems, the effects and mitigation of climate change, coordinating governance and management efforts across multiple jurisdictions, and examining relations between conservation policy and the social and economic well-being of Aboriginal peoples. The questions we identified provide potential links between evidence from the conservation sciences and formulation of policies for conservation and resource management. Our collaborative process of communication and engagement between scientists and decision makers for generating and prioritizing research questions at a national level could be a model for similar efforts beyond Canada. Generación de Preguntas de Investigación Prioritarias para Informar a las Políticas y Gestión de la Conservación a Nivel Nacional Blackwell Publishing Inc 2011-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3108069/ /pubmed/21175828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01625.x Text en ©2011, Society for Conservation Biology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Contributed Papers
Rudd, Murray A
Beazley, Karen F
Cooke, Steven J
Fleishman, Erica
Lane, Daniel E
Mascia, Michael B
Roth, Robin
Tabor, Gary
Bakker, Jiselle A
Bellefontaine, Teresa
Berteaux, Dominique
Cantin, Bernard
Chaulk, Keith G
Cunningham, Kathryn
Dobell, Rod
Fast, Eleanor
Ferrara, Nadia
Findlay, C Scott
Hallstrom, Lars K
Hammond, Thomas
Hermanutz, Luise
Hutchings, Jeffrey A
Lindsay, Kathryn E
Marta, Tim J
Nguyen, Vivian M
Northey, Greg
Prior, Kent
Ramirez-Sanchez, Saudiel
Rice, Jake
Sleep, Darren J H
Szabo, Nora D
Trottier, Geneviève
Toussaint, Jean-Patrick
Veilleux, Jean-Philippe
Generation of Priority Research Questions to Inform Conservation Policy and Management at a National Level
title Generation of Priority Research Questions to Inform Conservation Policy and Management at a National Level
title_full Generation of Priority Research Questions to Inform Conservation Policy and Management at a National Level
title_fullStr Generation of Priority Research Questions to Inform Conservation Policy and Management at a National Level
title_full_unstemmed Generation of Priority Research Questions to Inform Conservation Policy and Management at a National Level
title_short Generation of Priority Research Questions to Inform Conservation Policy and Management at a National Level
title_sort generation of priority research questions to inform conservation policy and management at a national level
topic Contributed Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21175828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01625.x
work_keys_str_mv AT ruddmurraya generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT beazleykarenf generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT cookestevenj generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT fleishmanerica generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT lanedaniele generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT masciamichaelb generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT rothrobin generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT taborgary generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT bakkerjisellea generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT bellefontaineteresa generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT berteauxdominique generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT cantinbernard generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT chaulkkeithg generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT cunninghamkathryn generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT dobellrod generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT fasteleanor generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT ferraranadia generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT findlaycscott generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT hallstromlarsk generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT hammondthomas generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT hermanutzluise generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT hutchingsjeffreya generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT lindsaykathryne generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT martatimj generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT nguyenvivianm generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT northeygreg generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT priorkent generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT ramirezsanchezsaudiel generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT ricejake generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT sleepdarrenjh generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT szabonorad generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT trottiergenevieve generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT toussaintjeanpatrick generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel
AT veilleuxjeanphilippe generationofpriorityresearchquestionstoinformconservationpolicyandmanagementatanationallevel