Cargando…

Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Two Nicotine Replacement Treatment Delivery Models for a Tobacco Quitline

Many tobacco cessation quitlines provide nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in the U.S. but consensus is lacking regarding the best shipping protocol or NRT amounts. We evaluated the impact of the Minnesota QUITPLAN(®) Helpline’s shift from distributing NRT using a single eight-week shipment to a tw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saul, Jessie E., Lien, Rebecca, Schillo, Barbara, Kavanaugh, Annette, Wendling, Ann, Luxenberg, Michael, Greenseid, Lija, An, Lawrence C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21655136
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8051547
_version_ 1782205275198980096
author Saul, Jessie E.
Lien, Rebecca
Schillo, Barbara
Kavanaugh, Annette
Wendling, Ann
Luxenberg, Michael
Greenseid, Lija
An, Lawrence C.
author_facet Saul, Jessie E.
Lien, Rebecca
Schillo, Barbara
Kavanaugh, Annette
Wendling, Ann
Luxenberg, Michael
Greenseid, Lija
An, Lawrence C.
author_sort Saul, Jessie E.
collection PubMed
description Many tobacco cessation quitlines provide nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in the U.S. but consensus is lacking regarding the best shipping protocol or NRT amounts. We evaluated the impact of the Minnesota QUITPLAN(®) Helpline’s shift from distributing NRT using a single eight-week shipment to a two-shipment protocol. For this observational study, the eight week single-shipment cohort (n = 247) received eight weeks of NRT (patches or gum) at once, while the split-shipment cohort (n = 160) received five weeks of NRT (n = 94), followed by an additional three weeks of NRT if callers continued with counseling (n = 66). Patient satisfaction, retention, quit rates, and cost associated with the three groups were compared. A higher proportion of those receiving eight weeks of NRT, whether in one or two shipments, reported that the helpline was “very helpful” (77.2% of the single-shipment group; 81.1% of the two-shipment group) than those receiving five weeks of NRT (57.8% of the one-shipment group) (p = 0.004). Callers in the eight week two-shipment group completed significantly more calls (3.0) than callers in the five week one-shipment group (2.4) or eight week single-shipment group (1.7) (p < 0.001). Using both responder and intent-to-treat calculations, there were no significant differences in 30-day point prevalence abstinence at seven months among the three protocol groups even when controlling for demographic and tobacco use characteristics, and treatment group protocol. The mean cost per caller was greater for the single-shipment phase than the split-shipment phase ($350 vs. $326) due to the savings associated with not sending a second shipment to some participants. Assuming no difference in abstinence rates resulting from the protocol change, cost-per-quit was lowest for the five week one-shipment group ($1,155), and lower for the combined split-shipment cohort ($1,242) than for the single-shipment cohort ($1,350). Results of this evaluation indicate that while satisfaction rates increase among those receiving more counseling and NRT, quit rates do not, even when controlling for demographic and tobacco use characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3108126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31081262011-06-08 Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Two Nicotine Replacement Treatment Delivery Models for a Tobacco Quitline Saul, Jessie E. Lien, Rebecca Schillo, Barbara Kavanaugh, Annette Wendling, Ann Luxenberg, Michael Greenseid, Lija An, Lawrence C. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Many tobacco cessation quitlines provide nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in the U.S. but consensus is lacking regarding the best shipping protocol or NRT amounts. We evaluated the impact of the Minnesota QUITPLAN(®) Helpline’s shift from distributing NRT using a single eight-week shipment to a two-shipment protocol. For this observational study, the eight week single-shipment cohort (n = 247) received eight weeks of NRT (patches or gum) at once, while the split-shipment cohort (n = 160) received five weeks of NRT (n = 94), followed by an additional three weeks of NRT if callers continued with counseling (n = 66). Patient satisfaction, retention, quit rates, and cost associated with the three groups were compared. A higher proportion of those receiving eight weeks of NRT, whether in one or two shipments, reported that the helpline was “very helpful” (77.2% of the single-shipment group; 81.1% of the two-shipment group) than those receiving five weeks of NRT (57.8% of the one-shipment group) (p = 0.004). Callers in the eight week two-shipment group completed significantly more calls (3.0) than callers in the five week one-shipment group (2.4) or eight week single-shipment group (1.7) (p < 0.001). Using both responder and intent-to-treat calculations, there were no significant differences in 30-day point prevalence abstinence at seven months among the three protocol groups even when controlling for demographic and tobacco use characteristics, and treatment group protocol. The mean cost per caller was greater for the single-shipment phase than the split-shipment phase ($350 vs. $326) due to the savings associated with not sending a second shipment to some participants. Assuming no difference in abstinence rates resulting from the protocol change, cost-per-quit was lowest for the five week one-shipment group ($1,155), and lower for the combined split-shipment cohort ($1,242) than for the single-shipment cohort ($1,350). Results of this evaluation indicate that while satisfaction rates increase among those receiving more counseling and NRT, quit rates do not, even when controlling for demographic and tobacco use characteristics. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2011-05 2011-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3108126/ /pubmed/21655136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8051547 Text en © 2011 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Saul, Jessie E.
Lien, Rebecca
Schillo, Barbara
Kavanaugh, Annette
Wendling, Ann
Luxenberg, Michael
Greenseid, Lija
An, Lawrence C.
Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Two Nicotine Replacement Treatment Delivery Models for a Tobacco Quitline
title Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Two Nicotine Replacement Treatment Delivery Models for a Tobacco Quitline
title_full Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Two Nicotine Replacement Treatment Delivery Models for a Tobacco Quitline
title_fullStr Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Two Nicotine Replacement Treatment Delivery Models for a Tobacco Quitline
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Two Nicotine Replacement Treatment Delivery Models for a Tobacco Quitline
title_short Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Two Nicotine Replacement Treatment Delivery Models for a Tobacco Quitline
title_sort outcomes and cost-effectiveness of two nicotine replacement treatment delivery models for a tobacco quitline
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21655136
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8051547
work_keys_str_mv AT sauljessiee outcomesandcosteffectivenessoftwonicotinereplacementtreatmentdeliverymodelsforatobaccoquitline
AT lienrebecca outcomesandcosteffectivenessoftwonicotinereplacementtreatmentdeliverymodelsforatobaccoquitline
AT schillobarbara outcomesandcosteffectivenessoftwonicotinereplacementtreatmentdeliverymodelsforatobaccoquitline
AT kavanaughannette outcomesandcosteffectivenessoftwonicotinereplacementtreatmentdeliverymodelsforatobaccoquitline
AT wendlingann outcomesandcosteffectivenessoftwonicotinereplacementtreatmentdeliverymodelsforatobaccoquitline
AT luxenbergmichael outcomesandcosteffectivenessoftwonicotinereplacementtreatmentdeliverymodelsforatobaccoquitline
AT greenseidlija outcomesandcosteffectivenessoftwonicotinereplacementtreatmentdeliverymodelsforatobaccoquitline
AT anlawrencec outcomesandcosteffectivenessoftwonicotinereplacementtreatmentdeliverymodelsforatobaccoquitline