Cargando…

Value of routine sinus radiography in the diagnostic work-up of ill returned travelers: critical appraisal in a cohort of 765 travelers

BACKGROUND: Upper respiratory tract problems, eg, acute sinusitis are frequently occurring illnesses in returned travelers. The most accurate and cost-effective method for diagnosing these upper respiratory tract illnesses in hospital-based settings remains an area of uncertainty. In the present ret...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moolenaar, Carla, van Genderen, Perry J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21674023
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S19329
_version_ 1782205284005969920
author Moolenaar, Carla
van Genderen, Perry J
author_facet Moolenaar, Carla
van Genderen, Perry J
author_sort Moolenaar, Carla
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Upper respiratory tract problems, eg, acute sinusitis are frequently occurring illnesses in returned travelers. The most accurate and cost-effective method for diagnosing these upper respiratory tract illnesses in hospital-based settings remains an area of uncertainty. In the present retrospective cohort study, the usefulness of routine sinus radiography in the diagnostic work-up of ill returned travelers was evaluated. METHODS: This study was done at the Institute for Tropical Diseases in Rotterdam, and included all returned travelers who were ill with symptoms lasting less than one month in the period 2007–2009 and had sinus radiography on admission. Traveler demographic (including travel history), clinical, and laboratory data were collected on admission, and sinus radiography findings evaluated for their diagnostic power to predict sinusitis. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-five (22%) of 765 ill returned travelers had abnormal sinus radiography; more than half of the abnormal radiographic findings comprised mucosal membrane thickening of the sinuses. More than half of the travelers with abnormal sinus radiography had no upper respiratory tract symptoms at admission, which raises doubt about the clinical relevance of abnormal radiographic findings. Travelers with abnormal sinus radiography were more likely to receive nasal decongestants (relative risk 18.2, confidence interval 9.4–35.1) but not antibiotics. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study indicate that there is no additional value for routine sinus radiography in the diagnostic work-up of ill returned travelers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3108198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31081982011-06-13 Value of routine sinus radiography in the diagnostic work-up of ill returned travelers: critical appraisal in a cohort of 765 travelers Moolenaar, Carla van Genderen, Perry J Int J Gen Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Upper respiratory tract problems, eg, acute sinusitis are frequently occurring illnesses in returned travelers. The most accurate and cost-effective method for diagnosing these upper respiratory tract illnesses in hospital-based settings remains an area of uncertainty. In the present retrospective cohort study, the usefulness of routine sinus radiography in the diagnostic work-up of ill returned travelers was evaluated. METHODS: This study was done at the Institute for Tropical Diseases in Rotterdam, and included all returned travelers who were ill with symptoms lasting less than one month in the period 2007–2009 and had sinus radiography on admission. Traveler demographic (including travel history), clinical, and laboratory data were collected on admission, and sinus radiography findings evaluated for their diagnostic power to predict sinusitis. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-five (22%) of 765 ill returned travelers had abnormal sinus radiography; more than half of the abnormal radiographic findings comprised mucosal membrane thickening of the sinuses. More than half of the travelers with abnormal sinus radiography had no upper respiratory tract symptoms at admission, which raises doubt about the clinical relevance of abnormal radiographic findings. Travelers with abnormal sinus radiography were more likely to receive nasal decongestants (relative risk 18.2, confidence interval 9.4–35.1) but not antibiotics. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study indicate that there is no additional value for routine sinus radiography in the diagnostic work-up of ill returned travelers. Dove Medical Press 2011-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3108198/ /pubmed/21674023 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S19329 Text en © 2011 Moolenaar and van Genderen, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Moolenaar, Carla
van Genderen, Perry J
Value of routine sinus radiography in the diagnostic work-up of ill returned travelers: critical appraisal in a cohort of 765 travelers
title Value of routine sinus radiography in the diagnostic work-up of ill returned travelers: critical appraisal in a cohort of 765 travelers
title_full Value of routine sinus radiography in the diagnostic work-up of ill returned travelers: critical appraisal in a cohort of 765 travelers
title_fullStr Value of routine sinus radiography in the diagnostic work-up of ill returned travelers: critical appraisal in a cohort of 765 travelers
title_full_unstemmed Value of routine sinus radiography in the diagnostic work-up of ill returned travelers: critical appraisal in a cohort of 765 travelers
title_short Value of routine sinus radiography in the diagnostic work-up of ill returned travelers: critical appraisal in a cohort of 765 travelers
title_sort value of routine sinus radiography in the diagnostic work-up of ill returned travelers: critical appraisal in a cohort of 765 travelers
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21674023
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S19329
work_keys_str_mv AT moolenaarcarla valueofroutinesinusradiographyinthediagnosticworkupofillreturnedtravelerscriticalappraisalinacohortof765travelers
AT vangenderenperryj valueofroutinesinusradiographyinthediagnosticworkupofillreturnedtravelerscriticalappraisalinacohortof765travelers