Cargando…

Developing a decision aid to guide public sector health policy decisions: A study protocol

BACKGROUND: Decision aids have been developed in a number of health disciplines to support evidence-informed decision making, including patient decision aids and clinical practice guidelines. However, policy contexts differ from clinical contexts in terms of complexity and uncertainty, requiring dif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tso, Peggy, Culyer, Anthony J, Brouwers, Melissa, Dobrow, Mark J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21569255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-46
_version_ 1782205307079884800
author Tso, Peggy
Culyer, Anthony J
Brouwers, Melissa
Dobrow, Mark J
author_facet Tso, Peggy
Culyer, Anthony J
Brouwers, Melissa
Dobrow, Mark J
author_sort Tso, Peggy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Decision aids have been developed in a number of health disciplines to support evidence-informed decision making, including patient decision aids and clinical practice guidelines. However, policy contexts differ from clinical contexts in terms of complexity and uncertainty, requiring different approaches for identifying, interpreting, and applying many different types of evidence to support decisions. With few studies in the literature offering decision guidance specifically to health policymakers, the present study aims to facilitate the structured and systematic incorporation of research evidence and, where there is currently very little guidance, values and other non-research-based evidence, into the policy making process. The resulting decision aid is intended to help public sector health policy decision makers who are tasked with making evidence-informed decisions on behalf of populations. The intent is not to develop a decision aid that will yield uniform recommendations across jurisdictions, but rather to facilitate more transparent policy decisions that reflect a balanced consideration of all relevant factors. METHODS/DESIGN: The study comprises three phases: a modified meta-narrative review, the use of focus groups, and the application of a Delphi method. The modified meta-narrative review will inform the initial development of the decision aid by identifying as many policy decision factors as possible and other features of methodological guidance deemed to be desirable in the literatures of all relevant disciplines. The first of two focus groups will then seek to marry these findings with focus group members' own experience and expertise in public sector population-based health policy making and screening decisions. The second focus group will examine issues surrounding the application of the decision aid and act as a sounding board for initial feedback and refinement of the draft decision aid. Finally, the Delphi method will be used to further inform and refine the decision aid with a larger audience of potential end-users. DISCUSSION: The product of this research will be a working version of a decision aid to support policy makers in population-based health policy decisions. The decision aid will address the need for more structured and systematic ways of incorporating various evidentiary sources where applicable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3108337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31083372011-06-07 Developing a decision aid to guide public sector health policy decisions: A study protocol Tso, Peggy Culyer, Anthony J Brouwers, Melissa Dobrow, Mark J Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Decision aids have been developed in a number of health disciplines to support evidence-informed decision making, including patient decision aids and clinical practice guidelines. However, policy contexts differ from clinical contexts in terms of complexity and uncertainty, requiring different approaches for identifying, interpreting, and applying many different types of evidence to support decisions. With few studies in the literature offering decision guidance specifically to health policymakers, the present study aims to facilitate the structured and systematic incorporation of research evidence and, where there is currently very little guidance, values and other non-research-based evidence, into the policy making process. The resulting decision aid is intended to help public sector health policy decision makers who are tasked with making evidence-informed decisions on behalf of populations. The intent is not to develop a decision aid that will yield uniform recommendations across jurisdictions, but rather to facilitate more transparent policy decisions that reflect a balanced consideration of all relevant factors. METHODS/DESIGN: The study comprises three phases: a modified meta-narrative review, the use of focus groups, and the application of a Delphi method. The modified meta-narrative review will inform the initial development of the decision aid by identifying as many policy decision factors as possible and other features of methodological guidance deemed to be desirable in the literatures of all relevant disciplines. The first of two focus groups will then seek to marry these findings with focus group members' own experience and expertise in public sector population-based health policy making and screening decisions. The second focus group will examine issues surrounding the application of the decision aid and act as a sounding board for initial feedback and refinement of the draft decision aid. Finally, the Delphi method will be used to further inform and refine the decision aid with a larger audience of potential end-users. DISCUSSION: The product of this research will be a working version of a decision aid to support policy makers in population-based health policy decisions. The decision aid will address the need for more structured and systematic ways of incorporating various evidentiary sources where applicable. BioMed Central 2011-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3108337/ /pubmed/21569255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-46 Text en Copyright ©2011 Tso et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Tso, Peggy
Culyer, Anthony J
Brouwers, Melissa
Dobrow, Mark J
Developing a decision aid to guide public sector health policy decisions: A study protocol
title Developing a decision aid to guide public sector health policy decisions: A study protocol
title_full Developing a decision aid to guide public sector health policy decisions: A study protocol
title_fullStr Developing a decision aid to guide public sector health policy decisions: A study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Developing a decision aid to guide public sector health policy decisions: A study protocol
title_short Developing a decision aid to guide public sector health policy decisions: A study protocol
title_sort developing a decision aid to guide public sector health policy decisions: a study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21569255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-46
work_keys_str_mv AT tsopeggy developingadecisionaidtoguidepublicsectorhealthpolicydecisionsastudyprotocol
AT culyeranthonyj developingadecisionaidtoguidepublicsectorhealthpolicydecisionsastudyprotocol
AT brouwersmelissa developingadecisionaidtoguidepublicsectorhealthpolicydecisionsastudyprotocol
AT dobrowmarkj developingadecisionaidtoguidepublicsectorhealthpolicydecisionsastudyprotocol