Cargando…

THE COMPARISON BETWEEN TRICHLOROACETIC ACID 50% AND CO(2) LASER IN THE TREATMENT OF CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS SCAR

BACKGROUND: The scars of the cutaneous leishmaniasis and psychological problems of this disease need different interventions for its correction. AIM: Our objective in this study was to compare the efficacy of 50% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) solution and CO(2) laser for treatment of the atrophic scars...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nilforoushzadeh, Mohammad Ali, Jaffary, Fariba, Ansari, Nazli, Moradi, Shahram, Siadat, Amir Hossein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21716542
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.80411
_version_ 1782205320030846976
author Nilforoushzadeh, Mohammad Ali
Jaffary, Fariba
Ansari, Nazli
Moradi, Shahram
Siadat, Amir Hossein
author_facet Nilforoushzadeh, Mohammad Ali
Jaffary, Fariba
Ansari, Nazli
Moradi, Shahram
Siadat, Amir Hossein
author_sort Nilforoushzadeh, Mohammad Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The scars of the cutaneous leishmaniasis and psychological problems of this disease need different interventions for its correction. AIM: Our objective in this study was to compare the efficacy of 50% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) solution and CO(2) laser for treatment of the atrophic scars due to leishmaniasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized clinical trial performed in 92 patients. Patients were randomized into two groups: the first group was treated with 50% TCA solution, once monthly and for a maximum of 5 months, and the second group was treated with CO(2) laser which was performed for only one time. Patients were followed-up at 3 and 6 months after starting the treatment. The improvement of scar was graded by a 6-point scale using digital camera and the collected data were analyzed using SPSS software. RESULTS: In this study, 74 females and 18 males were enrolled. The improvement of scar was 48.13% in the TCA group and 44.87% in the CO(2) laser group. This difference was not statically significant (P = 0.55). There was also no significant difference regarding side effects between these two groups. CONCLUSION: The results of our study showed that efficacy of focal with 50% TCA solution is compared with CO(2) laser in treatment of leishmaniasis scar. Because of the low cost and simple application of TCA solution in comparison with CO(2) laser, we suggest use of this treatment for correction of leishmaniasis scar or the atrophic scars.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3108516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31085162011-06-28 THE COMPARISON BETWEEN TRICHLOROACETIC ACID 50% AND CO(2) LASER IN THE TREATMENT OF CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS SCAR Nilforoushzadeh, Mohammad Ali Jaffary, Fariba Ansari, Nazli Moradi, Shahram Siadat, Amir Hossein Indian J Dermatol Therapeutic Round BACKGROUND: The scars of the cutaneous leishmaniasis and psychological problems of this disease need different interventions for its correction. AIM: Our objective in this study was to compare the efficacy of 50% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) solution and CO(2) laser for treatment of the atrophic scars due to leishmaniasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized clinical trial performed in 92 patients. Patients were randomized into two groups: the first group was treated with 50% TCA solution, once monthly and for a maximum of 5 months, and the second group was treated with CO(2) laser which was performed for only one time. Patients were followed-up at 3 and 6 months after starting the treatment. The improvement of scar was graded by a 6-point scale using digital camera and the collected data were analyzed using SPSS software. RESULTS: In this study, 74 females and 18 males were enrolled. The improvement of scar was 48.13% in the TCA group and 44.87% in the CO(2) laser group. This difference was not statically significant (P = 0.55). There was also no significant difference regarding side effects between these two groups. CONCLUSION: The results of our study showed that efficacy of focal with 50% TCA solution is compared with CO(2) laser in treatment of leishmaniasis scar. Because of the low cost and simple application of TCA solution in comparison with CO(2) laser, we suggest use of this treatment for correction of leishmaniasis scar or the atrophic scars. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3108516/ /pubmed/21716542 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.80411 Text en © Indian Journal of Dermatology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Therapeutic Round
Nilforoushzadeh, Mohammad Ali
Jaffary, Fariba
Ansari, Nazli
Moradi, Shahram
Siadat, Amir Hossein
THE COMPARISON BETWEEN TRICHLOROACETIC ACID 50% AND CO(2) LASER IN THE TREATMENT OF CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS SCAR
title THE COMPARISON BETWEEN TRICHLOROACETIC ACID 50% AND CO(2) LASER IN THE TREATMENT OF CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS SCAR
title_full THE COMPARISON BETWEEN TRICHLOROACETIC ACID 50% AND CO(2) LASER IN THE TREATMENT OF CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS SCAR
title_fullStr THE COMPARISON BETWEEN TRICHLOROACETIC ACID 50% AND CO(2) LASER IN THE TREATMENT OF CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS SCAR
title_full_unstemmed THE COMPARISON BETWEEN TRICHLOROACETIC ACID 50% AND CO(2) LASER IN THE TREATMENT OF CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS SCAR
title_short THE COMPARISON BETWEEN TRICHLOROACETIC ACID 50% AND CO(2) LASER IN THE TREATMENT OF CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS SCAR
title_sort comparison between trichloroacetic acid 50% and co(2) laser in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis scar
topic Therapeutic Round
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21716542
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.80411
work_keys_str_mv AT nilforoushzadehmohammadali thecomparisonbetweentrichloroaceticacid50andco2laserinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisscar
AT jaffaryfariba thecomparisonbetweentrichloroaceticacid50andco2laserinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisscar
AT ansarinazli thecomparisonbetweentrichloroaceticacid50andco2laserinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisscar
AT moradishahram thecomparisonbetweentrichloroaceticacid50andco2laserinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisscar
AT siadatamirhossein thecomparisonbetweentrichloroaceticacid50andco2laserinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisscar
AT nilforoushzadehmohammadali comparisonbetweentrichloroaceticacid50andco2laserinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisscar
AT jaffaryfariba comparisonbetweentrichloroaceticacid50andco2laserinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisscar
AT ansarinazli comparisonbetweentrichloroaceticacid50andco2laserinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisscar
AT moradishahram comparisonbetweentrichloroaceticacid50andco2laserinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisscar
AT siadatamirhossein comparisonbetweentrichloroaceticacid50andco2laserinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisscar