Cargando…

Patients’ views of medical positioning for proctologic examination

BACKGROUND: It is unknown which proctological position is most embarrassing to patients. METHODS: Individuals consecutively referred to our outpatient clinic in order to determine the causes of anal and/or abdominal complaints were randomized to complete an unvalidated six-item questionnaire which a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gebbensleben, Ole, Hilger, York, Rohde, Henning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21694837
_version_ 1782205342293164032
author Gebbensleben, Ole
Hilger, York
Rohde, Henning
author_facet Gebbensleben, Ole
Hilger, York
Rohde, Henning
author_sort Gebbensleben, Ole
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is unknown which proctological position is most embarrassing to patients. METHODS: Individuals consecutively referred to our outpatient clinic in order to determine the causes of anal and/or abdominal complaints were randomized to complete an unvalidated six-item questionnaire which asked for their preferred proctologic positioning either before or after a proctological examination in knee–chest position followed by inspection of the anal verge, digital examination of the anal canal, and anoscopy. A third group of patients referred for gastroscopy was asked to complete the questionnaire before being gastroscoped. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-eight individuals of both genders aged 16–80 years who consecutively entered our outpatient clinic were enrolled. One third in each group had never experienced any of the offered medical positionings. Most patients favored the Sims’ position if they had the choice. Randomized patients favored the knee–chest position more after experiencing it compared to those without experience (P < 0.03). Patients favored the positions they had recently experienced irrespective of the other positions offered in the questionnaire (P < 0.05). Individual answers to the question ‘which position do you find most embarrassing?’ did not depend on sex or age at first examination or when their last examination was performed. The majority of patients (55.2%–71.4%) held that no type of proctological positioning was most embarrassing to them. CONCLUSIONS: The medical profession is authorized to use the proctological positioning that allows the most reliable anal diagnoses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3108641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31086412011-06-21 Patients’ views of medical positioning for proctologic examination Gebbensleben, Ole Hilger, York Rohde, Henning Clin Exp Gastroenterol Original Research BACKGROUND: It is unknown which proctological position is most embarrassing to patients. METHODS: Individuals consecutively referred to our outpatient clinic in order to determine the causes of anal and/or abdominal complaints were randomized to complete an unvalidated six-item questionnaire which asked for their preferred proctologic positioning either before or after a proctological examination in knee–chest position followed by inspection of the anal verge, digital examination of the anal canal, and anoscopy. A third group of patients referred for gastroscopy was asked to complete the questionnaire before being gastroscoped. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-eight individuals of both genders aged 16–80 years who consecutively entered our outpatient clinic were enrolled. One third in each group had never experienced any of the offered medical positionings. Most patients favored the Sims’ position if they had the choice. Randomized patients favored the knee–chest position more after experiencing it compared to those without experience (P < 0.03). Patients favored the positions they had recently experienced irrespective of the other positions offered in the questionnaire (P < 0.05). Individual answers to the question ‘which position do you find most embarrassing?’ did not depend on sex or age at first examination or when their last examination was performed. The majority of patients (55.2%–71.4%) held that no type of proctological positioning was most embarrassing to them. CONCLUSIONS: The medical profession is authorized to use the proctological positioning that allows the most reliable anal diagnoses. Dove Medical Press 2009-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3108641/ /pubmed/21694837 Text en © 2009 Gebbensleben et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gebbensleben, Ole
Hilger, York
Rohde, Henning
Patients’ views of medical positioning for proctologic examination
title Patients’ views of medical positioning for proctologic examination
title_full Patients’ views of medical positioning for proctologic examination
title_fullStr Patients’ views of medical positioning for proctologic examination
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ views of medical positioning for proctologic examination
title_short Patients’ views of medical positioning for proctologic examination
title_sort patients’ views of medical positioning for proctologic examination
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21694837
work_keys_str_mv AT gebbenslebenole patientsviewsofmedicalpositioningforproctologicexamination
AT hilgeryork patientsviewsofmedicalpositioningforproctologicexamination
AT rohdehenning patientsviewsofmedicalpositioningforproctologicexamination