Cargando…

Management of achalasia

Several theories on the etiology and pathophysiology of achalasia have been reported but, to date, it is widely accepted that loss of peristalsis and absence of swallow-induced relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter are the main functional abnormalities. Treatment of achalasia often aims to al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dughera, Luca, Chiaverina, Michele, Cacciotella, Luca, Cisarò, Fabio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21694870
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S11593
_version_ 1782205351203962880
author Dughera, Luca
Chiaverina, Michele
Cacciotella, Luca
Cisarò, Fabio
author_facet Dughera, Luca
Chiaverina, Michele
Cacciotella, Luca
Cisarò, Fabio
author_sort Dughera, Luca
collection PubMed
description Several theories on the etiology and pathophysiology of achalasia have been reported but, to date, it is widely accepted that loss of peristalsis and absence of swallow-induced relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter are the main functional abnormalities. Treatment of achalasia often aims to alleviate the symptoms of achalasia and not to correct the underlying disorder. Medical therapy has poor efficacy, so patients who are good surgical candidates should be offered either laparoscopic myotomy or pneumatic balloon dilatation. Their own preference should be included in the decision-making process, and treatment should meet the local expertise with these procedures. Laparoscopic surgical esophagomyotomy is a safe and effective modality. It can be considered as initial management or as secondary treatment if the patient does not respond to less invasive modalities. Pneumatic dilatation has proven to be a safe, effective, and durable modality of treatment when performed by experienced individuals, and appears to be the most cost-effective alternative. For patients with multiple comorbidities and for elderly patients, who are not good surgical candidates, endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin should be considered a safe and effective procedure. However, its positive effect diminishes over time, and the need for multiple repeated sessions must be taken into consideration. In the management of patients with achalasia, nutritional aspects play an important role. When lifestyle changes are insufficient, it is necessary to proceed to percutaneous gastrostomy under radiological guidance. In the future, intraluminal myotomy or endoscopic mucosectomy will possibly be an option. Further studies are needed to investigate the role of immunosuppressive therapies in those cases in which an autoimmune etiology is suspected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3108680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31086802011-06-21 Management of achalasia Dughera, Luca Chiaverina, Michele Cacciotella, Luca Cisarò, Fabio Clin Exp Gastroenterol Review Several theories on the etiology and pathophysiology of achalasia have been reported but, to date, it is widely accepted that loss of peristalsis and absence of swallow-induced relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter are the main functional abnormalities. Treatment of achalasia often aims to alleviate the symptoms of achalasia and not to correct the underlying disorder. Medical therapy has poor efficacy, so patients who are good surgical candidates should be offered either laparoscopic myotomy or pneumatic balloon dilatation. Their own preference should be included in the decision-making process, and treatment should meet the local expertise with these procedures. Laparoscopic surgical esophagomyotomy is a safe and effective modality. It can be considered as initial management or as secondary treatment if the patient does not respond to less invasive modalities. Pneumatic dilatation has proven to be a safe, effective, and durable modality of treatment when performed by experienced individuals, and appears to be the most cost-effective alternative. For patients with multiple comorbidities and for elderly patients, who are not good surgical candidates, endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin should be considered a safe and effective procedure. However, its positive effect diminishes over time, and the need for multiple repeated sessions must be taken into consideration. In the management of patients with achalasia, nutritional aspects play an important role. When lifestyle changes are insufficient, it is necessary to proceed to percutaneous gastrostomy under radiological guidance. In the future, intraluminal myotomy or endoscopic mucosectomy will possibly be an option. Further studies are needed to investigate the role of immunosuppressive therapies in those cases in which an autoimmune etiology is suspected. Dove Medical Press 2011-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3108680/ /pubmed/21694870 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S11593 Text en © 2011 Dughera et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Dughera, Luca
Chiaverina, Michele
Cacciotella, Luca
Cisarò, Fabio
Management of achalasia
title Management of achalasia
title_full Management of achalasia
title_fullStr Management of achalasia
title_full_unstemmed Management of achalasia
title_short Management of achalasia
title_sort management of achalasia
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21694870
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S11593
work_keys_str_mv AT dugheraluca managementofachalasia
AT chiaverinamichele managementofachalasia
AT cacciotellaluca managementofachalasia
AT cisarofabio managementofachalasia