Cargando…

Characterization of intraocular pressure responses of the Tibetan monkey (Macaca thibetana)

PURPOSE: To characterize the effects of circadian rhythm, feeding time, age, general anesthesia, and ocular hypotensive compounds on intraocular pressure (IOP) of the Tibetan monkey (Macaca thibetana). METHODS: Tibetan monkeys were trained for IOP measurement with the TonoVet® rebound tonometer with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Guo, Zeng, Tao, Yu, Wenhan, Yan, Naihong, Wang, Hongxing, Cai, Su-ping, Pang, Iok-Hou, Liu, Xuyang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Vision 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21654897
_version_ 1782205379357179904
author Liu, Guo
Zeng, Tao
Yu, Wenhan
Yan, Naihong
Wang, Hongxing
Cai, Su-ping
Pang, Iok-Hou
Liu, Xuyang
author_facet Liu, Guo
Zeng, Tao
Yu, Wenhan
Yan, Naihong
Wang, Hongxing
Cai, Su-ping
Pang, Iok-Hou
Liu, Xuyang
author_sort Liu, Guo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To characterize the effects of circadian rhythm, feeding time, age, general anesthesia, and ocular hypotensive compounds on intraocular pressure (IOP) of the Tibetan monkey (Macaca thibetana). METHODS: Tibetan monkeys were trained for IOP measurement with the TonoVet® rebound tonometer without sedation or anesthesia. Their circadian IOP fluctuation was monitored every 3 h. Effects of changing the feeding time, general anesthesia, age (2–3 year-old versus 8–15 year-old animals), and various pharmacological agents, such as travoprost, timolol, naphazoline and spiradoline, on IOP were also evaluated. RESULTS: After behavioral training, conscious Tibetan monkeys were receptive to IOP measurement. The lowest and highest IOP values in a circadian cycle were recorded at 3:00 AM (19.8±0.4 mmHg, mean±SEM, n=12) and noon (29.3±0.9 mmHg), respectively. Changing the feeding time from 11:30 AM to 12:30 PM lowered the noon IOP to 25.1±1.2 mmHg. General anesthesia lowered IOP in these monkeys, while IOP of young and mature animals were similar. Three hours after topical ocular administration, travoprost reduced IOP by 5.2±0.6 mmHg (n=6, p<0.001), and timolol reduced IOP by 2.8±0.7 mmHg (p<0.05). Naphazoline and spiradoline lowered IOP by 4.8 mmHg and 2.5 mmHg (both p<0.001), respectively, 2 h after drug administration. CONCLUSIONS: The circadian IOP fluctuation in conscious Tibetan monkeys and their responses to travoprost, timolol, and other experimental conditions are similar to other primates. These monkeys appear to be a suitable model for glaucoma research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3108893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Molecular Vision
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31088932011-06-07 Characterization of intraocular pressure responses of the Tibetan monkey (Macaca thibetana) Liu, Guo Zeng, Tao Yu, Wenhan Yan, Naihong Wang, Hongxing Cai, Su-ping Pang, Iok-Hou Liu, Xuyang Mol Vis Research Article PURPOSE: To characterize the effects of circadian rhythm, feeding time, age, general anesthesia, and ocular hypotensive compounds on intraocular pressure (IOP) of the Tibetan monkey (Macaca thibetana). METHODS: Tibetan monkeys were trained for IOP measurement with the TonoVet® rebound tonometer without sedation or anesthesia. Their circadian IOP fluctuation was monitored every 3 h. Effects of changing the feeding time, general anesthesia, age (2–3 year-old versus 8–15 year-old animals), and various pharmacological agents, such as travoprost, timolol, naphazoline and spiradoline, on IOP were also evaluated. RESULTS: After behavioral training, conscious Tibetan monkeys were receptive to IOP measurement. The lowest and highest IOP values in a circadian cycle were recorded at 3:00 AM (19.8±0.4 mmHg, mean±SEM, n=12) and noon (29.3±0.9 mmHg), respectively. Changing the feeding time from 11:30 AM to 12:30 PM lowered the noon IOP to 25.1±1.2 mmHg. General anesthesia lowered IOP in these monkeys, while IOP of young and mature animals were similar. Three hours after topical ocular administration, travoprost reduced IOP by 5.2±0.6 mmHg (n=6, p<0.001), and timolol reduced IOP by 2.8±0.7 mmHg (p<0.05). Naphazoline and spiradoline lowered IOP by 4.8 mmHg and 2.5 mmHg (both p<0.001), respectively, 2 h after drug administration. CONCLUSIONS: The circadian IOP fluctuation in conscious Tibetan monkeys and their responses to travoprost, timolol, and other experimental conditions are similar to other primates. These monkeys appear to be a suitable model for glaucoma research. Molecular Vision 2011-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3108893/ /pubmed/21654897 Text en Copyright © 2011 Molecular Vision. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Guo
Zeng, Tao
Yu, Wenhan
Yan, Naihong
Wang, Hongxing
Cai, Su-ping
Pang, Iok-Hou
Liu, Xuyang
Characterization of intraocular pressure responses of the Tibetan monkey (Macaca thibetana)
title Characterization of intraocular pressure responses of the Tibetan monkey (Macaca thibetana)
title_full Characterization of intraocular pressure responses of the Tibetan monkey (Macaca thibetana)
title_fullStr Characterization of intraocular pressure responses of the Tibetan monkey (Macaca thibetana)
title_full_unstemmed Characterization of intraocular pressure responses of the Tibetan monkey (Macaca thibetana)
title_short Characterization of intraocular pressure responses of the Tibetan monkey (Macaca thibetana)
title_sort characterization of intraocular pressure responses of the tibetan monkey (macaca thibetana)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21654897
work_keys_str_mv AT liuguo characterizationofintraocularpressureresponsesofthetibetanmonkeymacacathibetana
AT zengtao characterizationofintraocularpressureresponsesofthetibetanmonkeymacacathibetana
AT yuwenhan characterizationofintraocularpressureresponsesofthetibetanmonkeymacacathibetana
AT yannaihong characterizationofintraocularpressureresponsesofthetibetanmonkeymacacathibetana
AT wanghongxing characterizationofintraocularpressureresponsesofthetibetanmonkeymacacathibetana
AT caisuping characterizationofintraocularpressureresponsesofthetibetanmonkeymacacathibetana
AT pangiokhou characterizationofintraocularpressureresponsesofthetibetanmonkeymacacathibetana
AT liuxuyang characterizationofintraocularpressureresponsesofthetibetanmonkeymacacathibetana