Cargando…
Characterization of intraocular pressure responses of the Tibetan monkey (Macaca thibetana)
PURPOSE: To characterize the effects of circadian rhythm, feeding time, age, general anesthesia, and ocular hypotensive compounds on intraocular pressure (IOP) of the Tibetan monkey (Macaca thibetana). METHODS: Tibetan monkeys were trained for IOP measurement with the TonoVet® rebound tonometer with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Molecular Vision
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21654897 |
_version_ | 1782205379357179904 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Guo Zeng, Tao Yu, Wenhan Yan, Naihong Wang, Hongxing Cai, Su-ping Pang, Iok-Hou Liu, Xuyang |
author_facet | Liu, Guo Zeng, Tao Yu, Wenhan Yan, Naihong Wang, Hongxing Cai, Su-ping Pang, Iok-Hou Liu, Xuyang |
author_sort | Liu, Guo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To characterize the effects of circadian rhythm, feeding time, age, general anesthesia, and ocular hypotensive compounds on intraocular pressure (IOP) of the Tibetan monkey (Macaca thibetana). METHODS: Tibetan monkeys were trained for IOP measurement with the TonoVet® rebound tonometer without sedation or anesthesia. Their circadian IOP fluctuation was monitored every 3 h. Effects of changing the feeding time, general anesthesia, age (2–3 year-old versus 8–15 year-old animals), and various pharmacological agents, such as travoprost, timolol, naphazoline and spiradoline, on IOP were also evaluated. RESULTS: After behavioral training, conscious Tibetan monkeys were receptive to IOP measurement. The lowest and highest IOP values in a circadian cycle were recorded at 3:00 AM (19.8±0.4 mmHg, mean±SEM, n=12) and noon (29.3±0.9 mmHg), respectively. Changing the feeding time from 11:30 AM to 12:30 PM lowered the noon IOP to 25.1±1.2 mmHg. General anesthesia lowered IOP in these monkeys, while IOP of young and mature animals were similar. Three hours after topical ocular administration, travoprost reduced IOP by 5.2±0.6 mmHg (n=6, p<0.001), and timolol reduced IOP by 2.8±0.7 mmHg (p<0.05). Naphazoline and spiradoline lowered IOP by 4.8 mmHg and 2.5 mmHg (both p<0.001), respectively, 2 h after drug administration. CONCLUSIONS: The circadian IOP fluctuation in conscious Tibetan monkeys and their responses to travoprost, timolol, and other experimental conditions are similar to other primates. These monkeys appear to be a suitable model for glaucoma research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3108893 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Molecular Vision |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31088932011-06-07 Characterization of intraocular pressure responses of the Tibetan monkey (Macaca thibetana) Liu, Guo Zeng, Tao Yu, Wenhan Yan, Naihong Wang, Hongxing Cai, Su-ping Pang, Iok-Hou Liu, Xuyang Mol Vis Research Article PURPOSE: To characterize the effects of circadian rhythm, feeding time, age, general anesthesia, and ocular hypotensive compounds on intraocular pressure (IOP) of the Tibetan monkey (Macaca thibetana). METHODS: Tibetan monkeys were trained for IOP measurement with the TonoVet® rebound tonometer without sedation or anesthesia. Their circadian IOP fluctuation was monitored every 3 h. Effects of changing the feeding time, general anesthesia, age (2–3 year-old versus 8–15 year-old animals), and various pharmacological agents, such as travoprost, timolol, naphazoline and spiradoline, on IOP were also evaluated. RESULTS: After behavioral training, conscious Tibetan monkeys were receptive to IOP measurement. The lowest and highest IOP values in a circadian cycle were recorded at 3:00 AM (19.8±0.4 mmHg, mean±SEM, n=12) and noon (29.3±0.9 mmHg), respectively. Changing the feeding time from 11:30 AM to 12:30 PM lowered the noon IOP to 25.1±1.2 mmHg. General anesthesia lowered IOP in these monkeys, while IOP of young and mature animals were similar. Three hours after topical ocular administration, travoprost reduced IOP by 5.2±0.6 mmHg (n=6, p<0.001), and timolol reduced IOP by 2.8±0.7 mmHg (p<0.05). Naphazoline and spiradoline lowered IOP by 4.8 mmHg and 2.5 mmHg (both p<0.001), respectively, 2 h after drug administration. CONCLUSIONS: The circadian IOP fluctuation in conscious Tibetan monkeys and their responses to travoprost, timolol, and other experimental conditions are similar to other primates. These monkeys appear to be a suitable model for glaucoma research. Molecular Vision 2011-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3108893/ /pubmed/21654897 Text en Copyright © 2011 Molecular Vision. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Liu, Guo Zeng, Tao Yu, Wenhan Yan, Naihong Wang, Hongxing Cai, Su-ping Pang, Iok-Hou Liu, Xuyang Characterization of intraocular pressure responses of the Tibetan monkey (Macaca thibetana) |
title | Characterization of intraocular pressure responses of the Tibetan monkey (Macaca thibetana) |
title_full | Characterization of intraocular pressure responses of the Tibetan monkey (Macaca thibetana) |
title_fullStr | Characterization of intraocular pressure responses of the Tibetan monkey (Macaca thibetana) |
title_full_unstemmed | Characterization of intraocular pressure responses of the Tibetan monkey (Macaca thibetana) |
title_short | Characterization of intraocular pressure responses of the Tibetan monkey (Macaca thibetana) |
title_sort | characterization of intraocular pressure responses of the tibetan monkey (macaca thibetana) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21654897 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuguo characterizationofintraocularpressureresponsesofthetibetanmonkeymacacathibetana AT zengtao characterizationofintraocularpressureresponsesofthetibetanmonkeymacacathibetana AT yuwenhan characterizationofintraocularpressureresponsesofthetibetanmonkeymacacathibetana AT yannaihong characterizationofintraocularpressureresponsesofthetibetanmonkeymacacathibetana AT wanghongxing characterizationofintraocularpressureresponsesofthetibetanmonkeymacacathibetana AT caisuping characterizationofintraocularpressureresponsesofthetibetanmonkeymacacathibetana AT pangiokhou characterizationofintraocularpressureresponsesofthetibetanmonkeymacacathibetana AT liuxuyang characterizationofintraocularpressureresponsesofthetibetanmonkeymacacathibetana |