Cargando…

Should EOAD patients be included in clinical trials?

Alzheimer disease (AD) is a devastating neurodegenerative disease affecting 1 in 68 in the population. An arbitrary cutoff 65 years as the age of onset to distinguish between early- and late-onset AD has been proposed and has been used in the literature for decades. As the majority of patients devel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Szigeti, Kinga, Doody, Rachelle S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3109413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21345175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/alzrt63
_version_ 1782205435441315840
author Szigeti, Kinga
Doody, Rachelle S
author_facet Szigeti, Kinga
Doody, Rachelle S
author_sort Szigeti, Kinga
collection PubMed
description Alzheimer disease (AD) is a devastating neurodegenerative disease affecting 1 in 68 in the population. An arbitrary cutoff 65 years as the age of onset to distinguish between early- and late-onset AD has been proposed and has been used in the literature for decades. As the majority of patients develop AD after 65 years of age, most clinical trials address this population. While the early-onset cases represent only 1% to 6% of AD cases, this population is the active working subset and thus contributes to a higher public health burden per individual, and early-onset cases are the most devastating at the level of the individual and their families. In this review, we compare and contrast the clinical, neuropsychological, imaging, genetic, biomarker, and pathological features of these two arbitrary groups. Finally, we discuss the ethical dilemma of non-abandonment and justice as it pertains to exclusion of the early-onset AD patients from clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3109413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31094132011-08-08 Should EOAD patients be included in clinical trials? Szigeti, Kinga Doody, Rachelle S Alzheimers Res Ther Review Alzheimer disease (AD) is a devastating neurodegenerative disease affecting 1 in 68 in the population. An arbitrary cutoff 65 years as the age of onset to distinguish between early- and late-onset AD has been proposed and has been used in the literature for decades. As the majority of patients develop AD after 65 years of age, most clinical trials address this population. While the early-onset cases represent only 1% to 6% of AD cases, this population is the active working subset and thus contributes to a higher public health burden per individual, and early-onset cases are the most devastating at the level of the individual and their families. In this review, we compare and contrast the clinical, neuropsychological, imaging, genetic, biomarker, and pathological features of these two arbitrary groups. Finally, we discuss the ethical dilemma of non-abandonment and justice as it pertains to exclusion of the early-onset AD patients from clinical trials. BioMed Central 2011-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3109413/ /pubmed/21345175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/alzrt63 Text en Copyright ©2011 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Review
Szigeti, Kinga
Doody, Rachelle S
Should EOAD patients be included in clinical trials?
title Should EOAD patients be included in clinical trials?
title_full Should EOAD patients be included in clinical trials?
title_fullStr Should EOAD patients be included in clinical trials?
title_full_unstemmed Should EOAD patients be included in clinical trials?
title_short Should EOAD patients be included in clinical trials?
title_sort should eoad patients be included in clinical trials?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3109413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21345175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/alzrt63
work_keys_str_mv AT szigetikinga shouldeoadpatientsbeincludedinclinicaltrials
AT doodyrachelles shouldeoadpatientsbeincludedinclinicaltrials