Cargando…

Longitudinal Evaluation of the Impact of Placement Development Teams on Student Support in Clinical Practice

AIMS: To investigate the impact of a new structure for supporting healthcare students and mentors in practice placements (Placement Development Teams). INTRODUCTION: The English Model National Partnership Agreement for healthcare education required Strategic Health Authorities, Higher Education Inst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williamson, Graham R, Callaghan, Lynne, Whittlesea, Emma, Mutton, Lauren, Heath, Val
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3109856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21660180
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874434601105010014
_version_ 1782205476096704512
author Williamson, Graham R
Callaghan, Lynne
Whittlesea, Emma
Mutton, Lauren
Heath, Val
author_facet Williamson, Graham R
Callaghan, Lynne
Whittlesea, Emma
Mutton, Lauren
Heath, Val
author_sort Williamson, Graham R
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To investigate the impact of a new structure for supporting healthcare students and mentors in practice placements (Placement Development Teams). INTRODUCTION: The English Model National Partnership Agreement for healthcare education required Strategic Health Authorities, Higher Education Institutions and National Health Service Trusts to redesign strategies for student support. Placement Development Teams are one English University’s response to this. MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY: This study was phase 2 of a longitudinal qualitative evaluation of Placement Development Teams. Data were collected after establishment of Placement Development Teams, and compared and contrasted with those collected prior to their implementation. Telephone interviews were conducted with key educational stakeholders in Trusts and Strategic Health Authorities. Focus groups were conducted with third year non-medical healthcare students and first year paramedics working in 16 NHS Trusts in the south west peninsula of England. RESULTS: Pre-Placement Development Teams, themes from the students’ data were: Supportive and unsupportive behaviour of staff; Mentor allocation; Placement allocation; Benefits of students to the placement area and Perceived control over the learning experience. Post-Placement Development Teams, the themes were Communication; Supportive and unsupportive behaviour of staff; The effect of peers on the placement experience; Knowledge and perceptions of the work of the PDTs. Form the staff data, pre-Placement Development Teams the themes were: Vision for improving student support. Post-Placement Development Teams themes from the staff data were how they provided a central point of contact for student and mentor support; and how they supported students and mentors. CONCLUSION: Support of students and mentors is particularly important following the introduction of The English Model National Partnership Agreement for healthcare education. Placement Development Teams can facilitate partnership working between higher education institutions and placement providers for student support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3109856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31098562011-06-09 Longitudinal Evaluation of the Impact of Placement Development Teams on Student Support in Clinical Practice Williamson, Graham R Callaghan, Lynne Whittlesea, Emma Mutton, Lauren Heath, Val Open Nurs J Article AIMS: To investigate the impact of a new structure for supporting healthcare students and mentors in practice placements (Placement Development Teams). INTRODUCTION: The English Model National Partnership Agreement for healthcare education required Strategic Health Authorities, Higher Education Institutions and National Health Service Trusts to redesign strategies for student support. Placement Development Teams are one English University’s response to this. MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY: This study was phase 2 of a longitudinal qualitative evaluation of Placement Development Teams. Data were collected after establishment of Placement Development Teams, and compared and contrasted with those collected prior to their implementation. Telephone interviews were conducted with key educational stakeholders in Trusts and Strategic Health Authorities. Focus groups were conducted with third year non-medical healthcare students and first year paramedics working in 16 NHS Trusts in the south west peninsula of England. RESULTS: Pre-Placement Development Teams, themes from the students’ data were: Supportive and unsupportive behaviour of staff; Mentor allocation; Placement allocation; Benefits of students to the placement area and Perceived control over the learning experience. Post-Placement Development Teams, the themes were Communication; Supportive and unsupportive behaviour of staff; The effect of peers on the placement experience; Knowledge and perceptions of the work of the PDTs. Form the staff data, pre-Placement Development Teams the themes were: Vision for improving student support. Post-Placement Development Teams themes from the staff data were how they provided a central point of contact for student and mentor support; and how they supported students and mentors. CONCLUSION: Support of students and mentors is particularly important following the introduction of The English Model National Partnership Agreement for healthcare education. Placement Development Teams can facilitate partnership working between higher education institutions and placement providers for student support. Bentham Open 2011-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3109856/ /pubmed/21660180 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874434601105010014 Text en © Williamson et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Williamson, Graham R
Callaghan, Lynne
Whittlesea, Emma
Mutton, Lauren
Heath, Val
Longitudinal Evaluation of the Impact of Placement Development Teams on Student Support in Clinical Practice
title Longitudinal Evaluation of the Impact of Placement Development Teams on Student Support in Clinical Practice
title_full Longitudinal Evaluation of the Impact of Placement Development Teams on Student Support in Clinical Practice
title_fullStr Longitudinal Evaluation of the Impact of Placement Development Teams on Student Support in Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed Longitudinal Evaluation of the Impact of Placement Development Teams on Student Support in Clinical Practice
title_short Longitudinal Evaluation of the Impact of Placement Development Teams on Student Support in Clinical Practice
title_sort longitudinal evaluation of the impact of placement development teams on student support in clinical practice
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3109856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21660180
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874434601105010014
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsongrahamr longitudinalevaluationoftheimpactofplacementdevelopmentteamsonstudentsupportinclinicalpractice
AT callaghanlynne longitudinalevaluationoftheimpactofplacementdevelopmentteamsonstudentsupportinclinicalpractice
AT whittleseaemma longitudinalevaluationoftheimpactofplacementdevelopmentteamsonstudentsupportinclinicalpractice
AT muttonlauren longitudinalevaluationoftheimpactofplacementdevelopmentteamsonstudentsupportinclinicalpractice
AT heathval longitudinalevaluationoftheimpactofplacementdevelopmentteamsonstudentsupportinclinicalpractice