Cargando…

Techniques for microsurgical reconstruction of obstructive azoospermia

About 10%–15% of infertile men present with azoospermia, and ductal obstruction is the cause in 40% of them. For about 25–30 years, microsurgical reconstruction was the only way to manage obstructive azoospermia, and several innovative techniques have been developed and implemented. Presently, assis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Marmar, Joel L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3110422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21716572
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.78438
_version_ 1782205523866681344
author Marmar, Joel L.
author_facet Marmar, Joel L.
author_sort Marmar, Joel L.
collection PubMed
description About 10%–15% of infertile men present with azoospermia, and ductal obstruction is the cause in 40% of them. For about 25–30 years, microsurgical reconstruction was the only way to manage obstructive azoospermia, and several innovative techniques have been developed and implemented. Presently, assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are available for these men as an alternative to surgery. Clinicians who treat these men must be familiar with all of these options, and many of the ART techniques have been covered in other sections of this symposium. However, the present article focuses on vasovasostomies and vasoepididymostomies. The intent of this review is to critique these microsurgical procedures, and present some surgical “pearls” related to them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3110422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31104222011-06-28 Techniques for microsurgical reconstruction of obstructive azoospermia Marmar, Joel L. Indian J Urol Symposium About 10%–15% of infertile men present with azoospermia, and ductal obstruction is the cause in 40% of them. For about 25–30 years, microsurgical reconstruction was the only way to manage obstructive azoospermia, and several innovative techniques have been developed and implemented. Presently, assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are available for these men as an alternative to surgery. Clinicians who treat these men must be familiar with all of these options, and many of the ART techniques have been covered in other sections of this symposium. However, the present article focuses on vasovasostomies and vasoepididymostomies. The intent of this review is to critique these microsurgical procedures, and present some surgical “pearls” related to them. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3110422/ /pubmed/21716572 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.78438 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Symposium
Marmar, Joel L.
Techniques for microsurgical reconstruction of obstructive azoospermia
title Techniques for microsurgical reconstruction of obstructive azoospermia
title_full Techniques for microsurgical reconstruction of obstructive azoospermia
title_fullStr Techniques for microsurgical reconstruction of obstructive azoospermia
title_full_unstemmed Techniques for microsurgical reconstruction of obstructive azoospermia
title_short Techniques for microsurgical reconstruction of obstructive azoospermia
title_sort techniques for microsurgical reconstruction of obstructive azoospermia
topic Symposium
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3110422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21716572
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.78438
work_keys_str_mv AT marmarjoell techniquesformicrosurgicalreconstructionofobstructiveazoospermia