Cargando…
Antidepressant Response in Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-Regression Comparison of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies
BACKGROUND: To compare response to antidepressants between randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational trials. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Published and unpublished studies (from 1989 to 2009) were searched for by 2 reviewers on Medline, the Cochrane library, Embase, clinicaltrials.gov, Current...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3110792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21687681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020811 |
_version_ | 1782205552745512960 |
---|---|
author | Naudet, Florian Maria, Anne Solène Falissard, Bruno |
author_facet | Naudet, Florian Maria, Anne Solène Falissard, Bruno |
author_sort | Naudet, Florian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare response to antidepressants between randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational trials. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Published and unpublished studies (from 1989 to 2009) were searched for by 2 reviewers on Medline, the Cochrane library, Embase, clinicaltrials.gov, Current Controlled Trial, bibliographies and by mailing key organisations and researchers. RCTs and observational studies on fluoxetine or venlafaxine in first-line treatment for major depressive disorder reported in English, French or Spanish language were included in the main analysis. Studies including patients from a wider spectrum of depressive disorders (anxious depression, minor depressive episode, dysthymia) were added in a second analysis. The main outcome was the pre-/post-treatment difference on depression scales standardised to 100 (17-item or 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression or Montgomery and Åsberg Rating Scale) in each study arm. A meta-regression was conducted to adjust the comparison between observational studies and RCTs on treatment type, study characteristics and average patient characteristics. 12 observational studies and 109 RCTs involving 6757 and 11035 patients in 12 and 149 arms were included in the main analysis. Meta-regression showed that the standardised treatment response in RCTs is greater by a magnitude of 4.59 (2.61 to 6.56). Study characteristics were related to standardised treatment response, positively (study duration, number of follow-up assessments, outpatients versus inpatients, per protocol analysis versus intention to treat analysis) or negatively (blinded design, placebo design). At patient level, response increased with baseline severity and decreased with age. Results of the second analysis were consistent with this. CONCLUSIONS: Response to antidepressants is greater in RCTs than in observational studies. Observational studies should be considered as a necessary complement to RCTs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3110792 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31107922011-06-16 Antidepressant Response in Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-Regression Comparison of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies Naudet, Florian Maria, Anne Solène Falissard, Bruno PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: To compare response to antidepressants between randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational trials. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Published and unpublished studies (from 1989 to 2009) were searched for by 2 reviewers on Medline, the Cochrane library, Embase, clinicaltrials.gov, Current Controlled Trial, bibliographies and by mailing key organisations and researchers. RCTs and observational studies on fluoxetine or venlafaxine in first-line treatment for major depressive disorder reported in English, French or Spanish language were included in the main analysis. Studies including patients from a wider spectrum of depressive disorders (anxious depression, minor depressive episode, dysthymia) were added in a second analysis. The main outcome was the pre-/post-treatment difference on depression scales standardised to 100 (17-item or 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression or Montgomery and Åsberg Rating Scale) in each study arm. A meta-regression was conducted to adjust the comparison between observational studies and RCTs on treatment type, study characteristics and average patient characteristics. 12 observational studies and 109 RCTs involving 6757 and 11035 patients in 12 and 149 arms were included in the main analysis. Meta-regression showed that the standardised treatment response in RCTs is greater by a magnitude of 4.59 (2.61 to 6.56). Study characteristics were related to standardised treatment response, positively (study duration, number of follow-up assessments, outpatients versus inpatients, per protocol analysis versus intention to treat analysis) or negatively (blinded design, placebo design). At patient level, response increased with baseline severity and decreased with age. Results of the second analysis were consistent with this. CONCLUSIONS: Response to antidepressants is greater in RCTs than in observational studies. Observational studies should be considered as a necessary complement to RCTs. Public Library of Science 2011-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3110792/ /pubmed/21687681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020811 Text en Naudet et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Naudet, Florian Maria, Anne Solène Falissard, Bruno Antidepressant Response in Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-Regression Comparison of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies |
title | Antidepressant Response in Major Depressive Disorder: A
Meta-Regression Comparison of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational
Studies |
title_full | Antidepressant Response in Major Depressive Disorder: A
Meta-Regression Comparison of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational
Studies |
title_fullStr | Antidepressant Response in Major Depressive Disorder: A
Meta-Regression Comparison of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational
Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Antidepressant Response in Major Depressive Disorder: A
Meta-Regression Comparison of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational
Studies |
title_short | Antidepressant Response in Major Depressive Disorder: A
Meta-Regression Comparison of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational
Studies |
title_sort | antidepressant response in major depressive disorder: a
meta-regression comparison of randomized controlled trials and observational
studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3110792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21687681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020811 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT naudetflorian antidepressantresponseinmajordepressivedisorderametaregressioncomparisonofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies AT mariaannesolene antidepressantresponseinmajordepressivedisorderametaregressioncomparisonofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies AT falissardbruno antidepressantresponseinmajordepressivedisorderametaregressioncomparisonofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies |