Cargando…

Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement

The quality of reporting of cohort studies published in the most prestigious scientific medical journals was investigated to indicate to what extent the items in the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist are addressed. Six top scientific medical jour...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poorolajal, Jalal, Cheraghi, Zahra, Irani, Amin Doosti, Rezaeian, Shahab
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Epidemiology 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3110877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21716598
http://dx.doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2011005
_version_ 1782205566717788160
author Poorolajal, Jalal
Cheraghi, Zahra
Irani, Amin Doosti
Rezaeian, Shahab
author_facet Poorolajal, Jalal
Cheraghi, Zahra
Irani, Amin Doosti
Rezaeian, Shahab
author_sort Poorolajal, Jalal
collection PubMed
description The quality of reporting of cohort studies published in the most prestigious scientific medical journals was investigated to indicate to what extent the items in the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist are addressed. Six top scientific medical journals with high impact factor were selected including New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, Lancet, British Medical Journal, Archive of Internal Medicine, and Canadian Medical Association Journal. Ten cohort studies published in 2010 were selected randomly from each journal. The percentage of items in the STROBE checklist that were addressed in each study was investigated. The total percentage of items addressed by these studies was 69.3 (95% confidence interval: 59.6 to 79.0). We concluded that reporting of cohort studies published in the most prestigious scientific medical journals is not clear enough yet. The reporting of other types of observational studies such as case-control and cross-sectional studies particularly those being published in less prestigious journals expected to be much more imprecise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3110877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Korean Society of Epidemiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31108772011-06-28 Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement Poorolajal, Jalal Cheraghi, Zahra Irani, Amin Doosti Rezaeian, Shahab Epidemiol Health Brief Communication The quality of reporting of cohort studies published in the most prestigious scientific medical journals was investigated to indicate to what extent the items in the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist are addressed. Six top scientific medical journals with high impact factor were selected including New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, Lancet, British Medical Journal, Archive of Internal Medicine, and Canadian Medical Association Journal. Ten cohort studies published in 2010 were selected randomly from each journal. The percentage of items in the STROBE checklist that were addressed in each study was investigated. The total percentage of items addressed by these studies was 69.3 (95% confidence interval: 59.6 to 79.0). We concluded that reporting of cohort studies published in the most prestigious scientific medical journals is not clear enough yet. The reporting of other types of observational studies such as case-control and cross-sectional studies particularly those being published in less prestigious journals expected to be much more imprecise. Korean Society of Epidemiology 2011-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3110877/ /pubmed/21716598 http://dx.doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2011005 Text en © 2011, Korean Society of Epidemiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Poorolajal, Jalal
Cheraghi, Zahra
Irani, Amin Doosti
Rezaeian, Shahab
Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement
title Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement
title_full Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement
title_fullStr Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement
title_full_unstemmed Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement
title_short Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement
title_sort quality of cohort studies reporting post the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (strobe) statement
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3110877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21716598
http://dx.doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2011005
work_keys_str_mv AT poorolajaljalal qualityofcohortstudiesreportingpostthestrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatement
AT cheraghizahra qualityofcohortstudiesreportingpostthestrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatement
AT iraniamindoosti qualityofcohortstudiesreportingpostthestrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatement
AT rezaeianshahab qualityofcohortstudiesreportingpostthestrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatement