Cargando…
Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement
The quality of reporting of cohort studies published in the most prestigious scientific medical journals was investigated to indicate to what extent the items in the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist are addressed. Six top scientific medical jour...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Epidemiology
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3110877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21716598 http://dx.doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2011005 |
_version_ | 1782205566717788160 |
---|---|
author | Poorolajal, Jalal Cheraghi, Zahra Irani, Amin Doosti Rezaeian, Shahab |
author_facet | Poorolajal, Jalal Cheraghi, Zahra Irani, Amin Doosti Rezaeian, Shahab |
author_sort | Poorolajal, Jalal |
collection | PubMed |
description | The quality of reporting of cohort studies published in the most prestigious scientific medical journals was investigated to indicate to what extent the items in the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist are addressed. Six top scientific medical journals with high impact factor were selected including New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, Lancet, British Medical Journal, Archive of Internal Medicine, and Canadian Medical Association Journal. Ten cohort studies published in 2010 were selected randomly from each journal. The percentage of items in the STROBE checklist that were addressed in each study was investigated. The total percentage of items addressed by these studies was 69.3 (95% confidence interval: 59.6 to 79.0). We concluded that reporting of cohort studies published in the most prestigious scientific medical journals is not clear enough yet. The reporting of other types of observational studies such as case-control and cross-sectional studies particularly those being published in less prestigious journals expected to be much more imprecise. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3110877 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Korean Society of Epidemiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31108772011-06-28 Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement Poorolajal, Jalal Cheraghi, Zahra Irani, Amin Doosti Rezaeian, Shahab Epidemiol Health Brief Communication The quality of reporting of cohort studies published in the most prestigious scientific medical journals was investigated to indicate to what extent the items in the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist are addressed. Six top scientific medical journals with high impact factor were selected including New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, Lancet, British Medical Journal, Archive of Internal Medicine, and Canadian Medical Association Journal. Ten cohort studies published in 2010 were selected randomly from each journal. The percentage of items in the STROBE checklist that were addressed in each study was investigated. The total percentage of items addressed by these studies was 69.3 (95% confidence interval: 59.6 to 79.0). We concluded that reporting of cohort studies published in the most prestigious scientific medical journals is not clear enough yet. The reporting of other types of observational studies such as case-control and cross-sectional studies particularly those being published in less prestigious journals expected to be much more imprecise. Korean Society of Epidemiology 2011-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3110877/ /pubmed/21716598 http://dx.doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2011005 Text en © 2011, Korean Society of Epidemiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication Poorolajal, Jalal Cheraghi, Zahra Irani, Amin Doosti Rezaeian, Shahab Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement |
title | Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement |
title_full | Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement |
title_fullStr | Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement |
title_short | Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement |
title_sort | quality of cohort studies reporting post the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (strobe) statement |
topic | Brief Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3110877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21716598 http://dx.doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2011005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poorolajaljalal qualityofcohortstudiesreportingpostthestrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatement AT cheraghizahra qualityofcohortstudiesreportingpostthestrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatement AT iraniamindoosti qualityofcohortstudiesreportingpostthestrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatement AT rezaeianshahab qualityofcohortstudiesreportingpostthestrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystrobestatement |