Cargando…
The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialog on Embodiment and Computational Modeling
Embodied theories are increasingly challenging traditional views of cognition by arguing that conceptual representations that constitute our knowledge are grounded in sensory and motor experiences, and processed at this sensorimotor level, rather than being represented and processed abstractly in an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3111422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21713184 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00005 |
_version_ | 1782205625197920256 |
---|---|
author | Pezzulo, Giovanni Barsalou, Lawrence W. Cangelosi, Angelo Fischer, Martin H. McRae, Ken Spivey, Michael J. |
author_facet | Pezzulo, Giovanni Barsalou, Lawrence W. Cangelosi, Angelo Fischer, Martin H. McRae, Ken Spivey, Michael J. |
author_sort | Pezzulo, Giovanni |
collection | PubMed |
description | Embodied theories are increasingly challenging traditional views of cognition by arguing that conceptual representations that constitute our knowledge are grounded in sensory and motor experiences, and processed at this sensorimotor level, rather than being represented and processed abstractly in an amodal conceptual system. Given the established empirical foundation, and the relatively underspecified theories to date, many researchers are extremely interested in embodied cognition but are clamoring for more mechanistic implementations. What is needed at this stage is a push toward explicit computational models that implement sensorimotor grounding as intrinsic to cognitive processes. In this article, six authors from varying backgrounds and approaches address issues concerning the construction of embodied computational models, and illustrate what they view as the critical current and next steps toward mechanistic theories of embodiment. The first part has the form of a dialog between two fictional characters: Ernest, the “experimenter,” and Mary, the “computational modeler.” The dialog consists of an interactive sequence of questions, requests for clarification, challenges, and (tentative) answers, and touches the most important aspects of grounded theories that should inform computational modeling and, conversely, the impact that computational modeling could have on embodied theories. The second part of the article discusses the most important open challenges for embodied computational modeling. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3111422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31114222011-06-27 The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialog on Embodiment and Computational Modeling Pezzulo, Giovanni Barsalou, Lawrence W. Cangelosi, Angelo Fischer, Martin H. McRae, Ken Spivey, Michael J. Front Psychol Psychology Embodied theories are increasingly challenging traditional views of cognition by arguing that conceptual representations that constitute our knowledge are grounded in sensory and motor experiences, and processed at this sensorimotor level, rather than being represented and processed abstractly in an amodal conceptual system. Given the established empirical foundation, and the relatively underspecified theories to date, many researchers are extremely interested in embodied cognition but are clamoring for more mechanistic implementations. What is needed at this stage is a push toward explicit computational models that implement sensorimotor grounding as intrinsic to cognitive processes. In this article, six authors from varying backgrounds and approaches address issues concerning the construction of embodied computational models, and illustrate what they view as the critical current and next steps toward mechanistic theories of embodiment. The first part has the form of a dialog between two fictional characters: Ernest, the “experimenter,” and Mary, the “computational modeler.” The dialog consists of an interactive sequence of questions, requests for clarification, challenges, and (tentative) answers, and touches the most important aspects of grounded theories that should inform computational modeling and, conversely, the impact that computational modeling could have on embodied theories. The second part of the article discusses the most important open challenges for embodied computational modeling. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3111422/ /pubmed/21713184 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00005 Text en Copyright © 2011 Pezzulo, Barsalou, Cangelosi, Fischer, McRae and Spivey. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Pezzulo, Giovanni Barsalou, Lawrence W. Cangelosi, Angelo Fischer, Martin H. McRae, Ken Spivey, Michael J. The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialog on Embodiment and Computational Modeling |
title | The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialog on Embodiment and Computational Modeling |
title_full | The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialog on Embodiment and Computational Modeling |
title_fullStr | The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialog on Embodiment and Computational Modeling |
title_full_unstemmed | The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialog on Embodiment and Computational Modeling |
title_short | The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialog on Embodiment and Computational Modeling |
title_sort | mechanics of embodiment: a dialog on embodiment and computational modeling |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3111422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21713184 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pezzulogiovanni themechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling AT barsaloulawrencew themechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling AT cangelosiangelo themechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling AT fischermartinh themechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling AT mcraeken themechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling AT spiveymichaelj themechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling AT pezzulogiovanni mechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling AT barsaloulawrencew mechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling AT cangelosiangelo mechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling AT fischermartinh mechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling AT mcraeken mechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling AT spiveymichaelj mechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling |