Cargando…

The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialog on Embodiment and Computational Modeling

Embodied theories are increasingly challenging traditional views of cognition by arguing that conceptual representations that constitute our knowledge are grounded in sensory and motor experiences, and processed at this sensorimotor level, rather than being represented and processed abstractly in an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pezzulo, Giovanni, Barsalou, Lawrence W., Cangelosi, Angelo, Fischer, Martin H., McRae, Ken, Spivey, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3111422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21713184
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00005
_version_ 1782205625197920256
author Pezzulo, Giovanni
Barsalou, Lawrence W.
Cangelosi, Angelo
Fischer, Martin H.
McRae, Ken
Spivey, Michael J.
author_facet Pezzulo, Giovanni
Barsalou, Lawrence W.
Cangelosi, Angelo
Fischer, Martin H.
McRae, Ken
Spivey, Michael J.
author_sort Pezzulo, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description Embodied theories are increasingly challenging traditional views of cognition by arguing that conceptual representations that constitute our knowledge are grounded in sensory and motor experiences, and processed at this sensorimotor level, rather than being represented and processed abstractly in an amodal conceptual system. Given the established empirical foundation, and the relatively underspecified theories to date, many researchers are extremely interested in embodied cognition but are clamoring for more mechanistic implementations. What is needed at this stage is a push toward explicit computational models that implement sensorimotor grounding as intrinsic to cognitive processes. In this article, six authors from varying backgrounds and approaches address issues concerning the construction of embodied computational models, and illustrate what they view as the critical current and next steps toward mechanistic theories of embodiment. The first part has the form of a dialog between two fictional characters: Ernest, the “experimenter,” and Mary, the “computational modeler.” The dialog consists of an interactive sequence of questions, requests for clarification, challenges, and (tentative) answers, and touches the most important aspects of grounded theories that should inform computational modeling and, conversely, the impact that computational modeling could have on embodied theories. The second part of the article discusses the most important open challenges for embodied computational modeling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3111422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31114222011-06-27 The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialog on Embodiment and Computational Modeling Pezzulo, Giovanni Barsalou, Lawrence W. Cangelosi, Angelo Fischer, Martin H. McRae, Ken Spivey, Michael J. Front Psychol Psychology Embodied theories are increasingly challenging traditional views of cognition by arguing that conceptual representations that constitute our knowledge are grounded in sensory and motor experiences, and processed at this sensorimotor level, rather than being represented and processed abstractly in an amodal conceptual system. Given the established empirical foundation, and the relatively underspecified theories to date, many researchers are extremely interested in embodied cognition but are clamoring for more mechanistic implementations. What is needed at this stage is a push toward explicit computational models that implement sensorimotor grounding as intrinsic to cognitive processes. In this article, six authors from varying backgrounds and approaches address issues concerning the construction of embodied computational models, and illustrate what they view as the critical current and next steps toward mechanistic theories of embodiment. The first part has the form of a dialog between two fictional characters: Ernest, the “experimenter,” and Mary, the “computational modeler.” The dialog consists of an interactive sequence of questions, requests for clarification, challenges, and (tentative) answers, and touches the most important aspects of grounded theories that should inform computational modeling and, conversely, the impact that computational modeling could have on embodied theories. The second part of the article discusses the most important open challenges for embodied computational modeling. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3111422/ /pubmed/21713184 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00005 Text en Copyright © 2011 Pezzulo, Barsalou, Cangelosi, Fischer, McRae and Spivey. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Psychology
Pezzulo, Giovanni
Barsalou, Lawrence W.
Cangelosi, Angelo
Fischer, Martin H.
McRae, Ken
Spivey, Michael J.
The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialog on Embodiment and Computational Modeling
title The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialog on Embodiment and Computational Modeling
title_full The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialog on Embodiment and Computational Modeling
title_fullStr The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialog on Embodiment and Computational Modeling
title_full_unstemmed The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialog on Embodiment and Computational Modeling
title_short The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialog on Embodiment and Computational Modeling
title_sort mechanics of embodiment: a dialog on embodiment and computational modeling
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3111422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21713184
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00005
work_keys_str_mv AT pezzulogiovanni themechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling
AT barsaloulawrencew themechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling
AT cangelosiangelo themechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling
AT fischermartinh themechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling
AT mcraeken themechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling
AT spiveymichaelj themechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling
AT pezzulogiovanni mechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling
AT barsaloulawrencew mechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling
AT cangelosiangelo mechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling
AT fischermartinh mechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling
AT mcraeken mechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling
AT spiveymichaelj mechanicsofembodimentadialogonembodimentandcomputationalmodeling