Cargando…

Use of Lidocaine Patch for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

BACKGROUND: Lidocaine patch (L5P) has demonstrated short-term efficacy in treating both acute surgical pain and chronic neuropathic pain with tolerable side effects. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is the mainstay of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS). Sufficient analgesia duri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kim, Kyung Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Pain Society 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3111563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21716614
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2011.24.2.74
_version_ 1782205645486817280
author Kim, Kyung Hoon
author_facet Kim, Kyung Hoon
author_sort Kim, Kyung Hoon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lidocaine patch (L5P) has demonstrated short-term efficacy in treating both acute surgical pain and chronic neuropathic pain with tolerable side effects. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is the mainstay of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS). Sufficient analgesia during PELD surgery makes the patient consider it real MISS. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of lidocaine patch in patients who underwent PELD under local anesthesia. METHODS: L5P (L group) or placebo (P group) was randomly applied on the skin of the back covering the anticipated path of the working channel before 1 hour of surgery in 100 patients who underwent a single level PELD at L4-L5. Efficacy of the lidocaine patch was assessed by patient's numeric rating scale (NRS) of pain at each stage during the surgery and by a 5-scale grading of the satisfaction with the anesthesia of the operator and patients after surgery. RESULTS: Mean NRS scores at the stages of needle insertion, skin incision, serial dilation and insertion of working channel, and subcutaneous suture were significantly lower in the L group than the P group. Postoperative operator's and patients' satisfaction scores were also significantly higher in L group than in the P group. There were subtle adverse effects in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: L5P provided better pain relief during PELD, especially at the stage of needle insertion, skin incision, serial dilation and insertion of working channel, and subcutaneous suture. It also provided higher patient and operator postoperative satisfaction, with only subtle adverse effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3111563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher The Korean Pain Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31115632011-06-28 Use of Lidocaine Patch for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Kim, Kyung Hoon Korean J Pain Original Article BACKGROUND: Lidocaine patch (L5P) has demonstrated short-term efficacy in treating both acute surgical pain and chronic neuropathic pain with tolerable side effects. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is the mainstay of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS). Sufficient analgesia during PELD surgery makes the patient consider it real MISS. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of lidocaine patch in patients who underwent PELD under local anesthesia. METHODS: L5P (L group) or placebo (P group) was randomly applied on the skin of the back covering the anticipated path of the working channel before 1 hour of surgery in 100 patients who underwent a single level PELD at L4-L5. Efficacy of the lidocaine patch was assessed by patient's numeric rating scale (NRS) of pain at each stage during the surgery and by a 5-scale grading of the satisfaction with the anesthesia of the operator and patients after surgery. RESULTS: Mean NRS scores at the stages of needle insertion, skin incision, serial dilation and insertion of working channel, and subcutaneous suture were significantly lower in the L group than the P group. Postoperative operator's and patients' satisfaction scores were also significantly higher in L group than in the P group. There were subtle adverse effects in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: L5P provided better pain relief during PELD, especially at the stage of needle insertion, skin incision, serial dilation and insertion of working channel, and subcutaneous suture. It also provided higher patient and operator postoperative satisfaction, with only subtle adverse effects. The Korean Pain Society 2011-06 2011-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3111563/ /pubmed/21716614 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2011.24.2.74 Text en Copyright © The Korean Pain Society, 2011 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Kyung Hoon
Use of Lidocaine Patch for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy
title Use of Lidocaine Patch for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy
title_full Use of Lidocaine Patch for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy
title_fullStr Use of Lidocaine Patch for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy
title_full_unstemmed Use of Lidocaine Patch for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy
title_short Use of Lidocaine Patch for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy
title_sort use of lidocaine patch for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3111563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21716614
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2011.24.2.74
work_keys_str_mv AT kimkyunghoon useoflidocainepatchforpercutaneousendoscopiclumbardiscectomy