Cargando…

Are the h-index and some of its alternatives discriminatory of epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences of faculty members? The case of social scientists in Quebec

This exploratory study aims at answering the following research question: Are the h-index and some of its derivatives discriminatory when applied to rank social scientists with different epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences? This study reports the results of five Tobit and two nega...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ouimet, Mathieu, Bédard, Pierre-Olivier, Gélineau, François
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3111734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21765564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0364-3
_version_ 1782205674097213440
author Ouimet, Mathieu
Bédard, Pierre-Olivier
Gélineau, François
author_facet Ouimet, Mathieu
Bédard, Pierre-Olivier
Gélineau, François
author_sort Ouimet, Mathieu
collection PubMed
description This exploratory study aims at answering the following research question: Are the h-index and some of its derivatives discriminatory when applied to rank social scientists with different epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences? This study reports the results of five Tobit and two negative binomial regression models taking as dependent variable the h-index and six of its derivatives, using a dataset combining bibliometric data collected with the PoP software with cross-sectional data of 321 Quebec social scientists in Anthropology, Sociology, Social Work, Political Science, Economics and Psychology. The results reveal an epistemological/methodological effect making positivists and quantitativists globally more productive than constructivists and qualitativists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3111734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31117342011-07-14 Are the h-index and some of its alternatives discriminatory of epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences of faculty members? The case of social scientists in Quebec Ouimet, Mathieu Bédard, Pierre-Olivier Gélineau, François Scientometrics Article This exploratory study aims at answering the following research question: Are the h-index and some of its derivatives discriminatory when applied to rank social scientists with different epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences? This study reports the results of five Tobit and two negative binomial regression models taking as dependent variable the h-index and six of its derivatives, using a dataset combining bibliometric data collected with the PoP software with cross-sectional data of 321 Quebec social scientists in Anthropology, Sociology, Social Work, Political Science, Economics and Psychology. The results reveal an epistemological/methodological effect making positivists and quantitativists globally more productive than constructivists and qualitativists. Springer Netherlands 2011-03-29 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3111734/ /pubmed/21765564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0364-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Ouimet, Mathieu
Bédard, Pierre-Olivier
Gélineau, François
Are the h-index and some of its alternatives discriminatory of epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences of faculty members? The case of social scientists in Quebec
title Are the h-index and some of its alternatives discriminatory of epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences of faculty members? The case of social scientists in Quebec
title_full Are the h-index and some of its alternatives discriminatory of epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences of faculty members? The case of social scientists in Quebec
title_fullStr Are the h-index and some of its alternatives discriminatory of epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences of faculty members? The case of social scientists in Quebec
title_full_unstemmed Are the h-index and some of its alternatives discriminatory of epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences of faculty members? The case of social scientists in Quebec
title_short Are the h-index and some of its alternatives discriminatory of epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences of faculty members? The case of social scientists in Quebec
title_sort are the h-index and some of its alternatives discriminatory of epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences of faculty members? the case of social scientists in quebec
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3111734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21765564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0364-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ouimetmathieu arethehindexandsomeofitsalternativesdiscriminatoryofepistemologicalbeliefsandmethodologicalpreferencesoffacultymembersthecaseofsocialscientistsinquebec
AT bedardpierreolivier arethehindexandsomeofitsalternativesdiscriminatoryofepistemologicalbeliefsandmethodologicalpreferencesoffacultymembersthecaseofsocialscientistsinquebec
AT gelineaufrancois arethehindexandsomeofitsalternativesdiscriminatoryofepistemologicalbeliefsandmethodologicalpreferencesoffacultymembersthecaseofsocialscientistsinquebec