Cargando…
Are the h-index and some of its alternatives discriminatory of epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences of faculty members? The case of social scientists in Quebec
This exploratory study aims at answering the following research question: Are the h-index and some of its derivatives discriminatory when applied to rank social scientists with different epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences? This study reports the results of five Tobit and two nega...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3111734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21765564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0364-3 |
_version_ | 1782205674097213440 |
---|---|
author | Ouimet, Mathieu Bédard, Pierre-Olivier Gélineau, François |
author_facet | Ouimet, Mathieu Bédard, Pierre-Olivier Gélineau, François |
author_sort | Ouimet, Mathieu |
collection | PubMed |
description | This exploratory study aims at answering the following research question: Are the h-index and some of its derivatives discriminatory when applied to rank social scientists with different epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences? This study reports the results of five Tobit and two negative binomial regression models taking as dependent variable the h-index and six of its derivatives, using a dataset combining bibliometric data collected with the PoP software with cross-sectional data of 321 Quebec social scientists in Anthropology, Sociology, Social Work, Political Science, Economics and Psychology. The results reveal an epistemological/methodological effect making positivists and quantitativists globally more productive than constructivists and qualitativists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3111734 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31117342011-07-14 Are the h-index and some of its alternatives discriminatory of epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences of faculty members? The case of social scientists in Quebec Ouimet, Mathieu Bédard, Pierre-Olivier Gélineau, François Scientometrics Article This exploratory study aims at answering the following research question: Are the h-index and some of its derivatives discriminatory when applied to rank social scientists with different epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences? This study reports the results of five Tobit and two negative binomial regression models taking as dependent variable the h-index and six of its derivatives, using a dataset combining bibliometric data collected with the PoP software with cross-sectional data of 321 Quebec social scientists in Anthropology, Sociology, Social Work, Political Science, Economics and Psychology. The results reveal an epistemological/methodological effect making positivists and quantitativists globally more productive than constructivists and qualitativists. Springer Netherlands 2011-03-29 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3111734/ /pubmed/21765564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0364-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Ouimet, Mathieu Bédard, Pierre-Olivier Gélineau, François Are the h-index and some of its alternatives discriminatory of epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences of faculty members? The case of social scientists in Quebec |
title | Are the h-index and some of its alternatives discriminatory of epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences of faculty members? The case of social scientists in Quebec |
title_full | Are the h-index and some of its alternatives discriminatory of epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences of faculty members? The case of social scientists in Quebec |
title_fullStr | Are the h-index and some of its alternatives discriminatory of epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences of faculty members? The case of social scientists in Quebec |
title_full_unstemmed | Are the h-index and some of its alternatives discriminatory of epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences of faculty members? The case of social scientists in Quebec |
title_short | Are the h-index and some of its alternatives discriminatory of epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences of faculty members? The case of social scientists in Quebec |
title_sort | are the h-index and some of its alternatives discriminatory of epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences of faculty members? the case of social scientists in quebec |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3111734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21765564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0364-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ouimetmathieu arethehindexandsomeofitsalternativesdiscriminatoryofepistemologicalbeliefsandmethodologicalpreferencesoffacultymembersthecaseofsocialscientistsinquebec AT bedardpierreolivier arethehindexandsomeofitsalternativesdiscriminatoryofepistemologicalbeliefsandmethodologicalpreferencesoffacultymembersthecaseofsocialscientistsinquebec AT gelineaufrancois arethehindexandsomeofitsalternativesdiscriminatoryofepistemologicalbeliefsandmethodologicalpreferencesoffacultymembersthecaseofsocialscientistsinquebec |