Cargando…
Validity of the 32-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32) in a clinical sample with mood disorders in China
BACKGROUND: The 32-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32), a questionnaire for screening bipolar disorders, has been utilised in several countries, but it unclear if the Chinese version of the HCL-32 is valid. METHODS: Consecutive patients with bipolar disorders (BP, N = 300) and unipolar major depressio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3112081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21575151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-84 |
_version_ | 1782205693234774016 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Hai-chen Yuan, Cheng-mei Liu, Tie-bang Li, Ling-jiang Peng, Hong-jun Liao, Chun-ping Rong, Han Fang, Yi-ru Angst, Jules |
author_facet | Yang, Hai-chen Yuan, Cheng-mei Liu, Tie-bang Li, Ling-jiang Peng, Hong-jun Liao, Chun-ping Rong, Han Fang, Yi-ru Angst, Jules |
author_sort | Yang, Hai-chen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The 32-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32), a questionnaire for screening bipolar disorders, has been utilised in several countries, but it unclear if the Chinese version of the HCL-32 is valid. METHODS: Consecutive patients with bipolar disorders (BP, N = 300) and unipolar major depression (UP, N = 156) completed the Chinese version of the HCL-32. The subjects underwent a structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis-I disorders (SCID). RESULTS: The eigenvalues for the first three factors in the HCL-32 were calculated as 5.16 (active/elated), 2.72 (risk-taking) and 2.48 (irritable) using factor analysis. Cronbach's alpha for the HCL-32 was calculated to be 0.88. Positive responses to twenty-eight items were significantly more frequent by patients with BP than those with UP, and the other four items (7th, 21st, 25th and 32nd) showed no such trend. Fourteen was the optimal cut-off for discriminating between BP and UP. The HCL-32 distinguished between BP-II and UP, with 13 being the optimal cut-off. A cut-off of 13 yielded a sensitivity of 0.77 and a specificity of 0.62 between BP and UP. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the simplified Chinese version of HCL-32 was valid for patients with mood disorders. The optimal cut-off of 13 for distinguishing between BP-II and UP was valid and could be used to improve the sensitivity of screening BP-II patients when the HCL-32 is used in psychiatric settings in China. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3112081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31120812011-06-11 Validity of the 32-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32) in a clinical sample with mood disorders in China Yang, Hai-chen Yuan, Cheng-mei Liu, Tie-bang Li, Ling-jiang Peng, Hong-jun Liao, Chun-ping Rong, Han Fang, Yi-ru Angst, Jules BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: The 32-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32), a questionnaire for screening bipolar disorders, has been utilised in several countries, but it unclear if the Chinese version of the HCL-32 is valid. METHODS: Consecutive patients with bipolar disorders (BP, N = 300) and unipolar major depression (UP, N = 156) completed the Chinese version of the HCL-32. The subjects underwent a structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis-I disorders (SCID). RESULTS: The eigenvalues for the first three factors in the HCL-32 were calculated as 5.16 (active/elated), 2.72 (risk-taking) and 2.48 (irritable) using factor analysis. Cronbach's alpha for the HCL-32 was calculated to be 0.88. Positive responses to twenty-eight items were significantly more frequent by patients with BP than those with UP, and the other four items (7th, 21st, 25th and 32nd) showed no such trend. Fourteen was the optimal cut-off for discriminating between BP and UP. The HCL-32 distinguished between BP-II and UP, with 13 being the optimal cut-off. A cut-off of 13 yielded a sensitivity of 0.77 and a specificity of 0.62 between BP and UP. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the simplified Chinese version of HCL-32 was valid for patients with mood disorders. The optimal cut-off of 13 for distinguishing between BP-II and UP was valid and could be used to improve the sensitivity of screening BP-II patients when the HCL-32 is used in psychiatric settings in China. BioMed Central 2011-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3112081/ /pubmed/21575151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-84 Text en Copyright ©2011 Yang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yang, Hai-chen Yuan, Cheng-mei Liu, Tie-bang Li, Ling-jiang Peng, Hong-jun Liao, Chun-ping Rong, Han Fang, Yi-ru Angst, Jules Validity of the 32-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32) in a clinical sample with mood disorders in China |
title | Validity of the 32-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32) in a clinical sample with mood disorders in China |
title_full | Validity of the 32-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32) in a clinical sample with mood disorders in China |
title_fullStr | Validity of the 32-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32) in a clinical sample with mood disorders in China |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity of the 32-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32) in a clinical sample with mood disorders in China |
title_short | Validity of the 32-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32) in a clinical sample with mood disorders in China |
title_sort | validity of the 32-item hypomania checklist (hcl-32) in a clinical sample with mood disorders in china |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3112081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21575151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-84 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanghaichen validityofthe32itemhypomaniachecklisthcl32inaclinicalsamplewithmooddisordersinchina AT yuanchengmei validityofthe32itemhypomaniachecklisthcl32inaclinicalsamplewithmooddisordersinchina AT liutiebang validityofthe32itemhypomaniachecklisthcl32inaclinicalsamplewithmooddisordersinchina AT lilingjiang validityofthe32itemhypomaniachecklisthcl32inaclinicalsamplewithmooddisordersinchina AT penghongjun validityofthe32itemhypomaniachecklisthcl32inaclinicalsamplewithmooddisordersinchina AT liaochunping validityofthe32itemhypomaniachecklisthcl32inaclinicalsamplewithmooddisordersinchina AT ronghan validityofthe32itemhypomaniachecklisthcl32inaclinicalsamplewithmooddisordersinchina AT fangyiru validityofthe32itemhypomaniachecklisthcl32inaclinicalsamplewithmooddisordersinchina AT angstjules validityofthe32itemhypomaniachecklisthcl32inaclinicalsamplewithmooddisordersinchina |