Cargando…

ERP correlates of intramodal and crossmodal L2 acquisition

BACKGROUND: The present study compared the neural correlates of an intramodally and a crossmodally acquired second language (L2). Deaf people who had learned their L1, German Sign Language (DGS), and their L2, German, through the visual modality were compared with hearing L2 learners of German and G...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skotara, Nils, Kügow, Monique, Salden, Uta, Hänel-Faulhaber, Barbara, Röder, Brigitte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3112113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21612604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-12-48
_version_ 1782205700720558080
author Skotara, Nils
Kügow, Monique
Salden, Uta
Hänel-Faulhaber, Barbara
Röder, Brigitte
author_facet Skotara, Nils
Kügow, Monique
Salden, Uta
Hänel-Faulhaber, Barbara
Röder, Brigitte
author_sort Skotara, Nils
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The present study compared the neural correlates of an intramodally and a crossmodally acquired second language (L2). Deaf people who had learned their L1, German Sign Language (DGS), and their L2, German, through the visual modality were compared with hearing L2 learners of German and German native speakers. Correct and incorrect German sentences were presented word by word on a computer screen while the electroencephalogram was recorded. At the end of each sentence, the participants judged whether or not the sentence was correct. Two types of violations were realized: Either a semantically implausible noun or a violation of subject-verb number agreement was embedded at a sentence medial position. RESULTS: Semantic errors elicited an N400, followed by a late positivity in all groups. In native speakers of German, verb-agreement violations were followed by a left lateralized negativity, which has been associated with an automatic parsing process. We observed a syntax related negativity in both high performing hearing and deaf L2 learners as well. Finally, this negativity was followed by a posteriorly distributed positivity in all three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although deaf learners have learned German as an L2 mainly via the visual modality they seem to engage comparable processing mechanisms as hearing L2 learners. Thus, the data underscore the modality transcendence of language.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3112113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31121132011-06-11 ERP correlates of intramodal and crossmodal L2 acquisition Skotara, Nils Kügow, Monique Salden, Uta Hänel-Faulhaber, Barbara Röder, Brigitte BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: The present study compared the neural correlates of an intramodally and a crossmodally acquired second language (L2). Deaf people who had learned their L1, German Sign Language (DGS), and their L2, German, through the visual modality were compared with hearing L2 learners of German and German native speakers. Correct and incorrect German sentences were presented word by word on a computer screen while the electroencephalogram was recorded. At the end of each sentence, the participants judged whether or not the sentence was correct. Two types of violations were realized: Either a semantically implausible noun or a violation of subject-verb number agreement was embedded at a sentence medial position. RESULTS: Semantic errors elicited an N400, followed by a late positivity in all groups. In native speakers of German, verb-agreement violations were followed by a left lateralized negativity, which has been associated with an automatic parsing process. We observed a syntax related negativity in both high performing hearing and deaf L2 learners as well. Finally, this negativity was followed by a posteriorly distributed positivity in all three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although deaf learners have learned German as an L2 mainly via the visual modality they seem to engage comparable processing mechanisms as hearing L2 learners. Thus, the data underscore the modality transcendence of language. BioMed Central 2011-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3112113/ /pubmed/21612604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-12-48 Text en Copyright ©2011 Skotara et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Skotara, Nils
Kügow, Monique
Salden, Uta
Hänel-Faulhaber, Barbara
Röder, Brigitte
ERP correlates of intramodal and crossmodal L2 acquisition
title ERP correlates of intramodal and crossmodal L2 acquisition
title_full ERP correlates of intramodal and crossmodal L2 acquisition
title_fullStr ERP correlates of intramodal and crossmodal L2 acquisition
title_full_unstemmed ERP correlates of intramodal and crossmodal L2 acquisition
title_short ERP correlates of intramodal and crossmodal L2 acquisition
title_sort erp correlates of intramodal and crossmodal l2 acquisition
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3112113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21612604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-12-48
work_keys_str_mv AT skotaranils erpcorrelatesofintramodalandcrossmodall2acquisition
AT kugowmonique erpcorrelatesofintramodalandcrossmodall2acquisition
AT saldenuta erpcorrelatesofintramodalandcrossmodall2acquisition
AT hanelfaulhaberbarbara erpcorrelatesofintramodalandcrossmodall2acquisition
AT roderbrigitte erpcorrelatesofintramodalandcrossmodall2acquisition