Cargando…

Non-Traumatic Acute Abdomen: Videolaparoscopic Approach

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although videolaparoscopy has been considerated a safe method for many elective procedures, its use in traumatic and non-traumatic acute abdomen needs to be evaluated. The aim of this article is to evaluate the role of videolaparoscopy in non-traumatic acute abdomen as a m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fahel, Edvaldo, Amaral, Paulo C.G., Filho, Euler M. Ázaro, Ettinger, João E.T.M., Souza, Elias L. Q., Fortes, Marcos F., Alcântara, Rogério S.M., Regis, Adrian B., Neto, Manoel P. Galvão, Sousa, Manoela M., Fogagnoli, Wagner G., Cunha, André G., Castro, Manoel M.O., Santana, Pedro A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 1999
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3113153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10527329
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although videolaparoscopy has been considerated a safe method for many elective procedures, its use in traumatic and non-traumatic acute abdomen needs to be evaluated. The aim of this article is to evaluate the role of videolaparoscopy in non-traumatic acute abdomen as a method of diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: Between January 1992 and December 1996, 462 patients' charts were reviewed, retrospectively. Patients were admitted to the emergency room of Sao Rafael Hospital with symptoms of non-traumatic acute abdomen. Routine investigation of abdominal pain was performed in all patients, followed by videolaparoscopy. The laparoscopic procedures were done with four main purposes: diagnosis (ie, enteritis); diagnosis and treatment (ie, appendicitis); treatment only, when the diagnosis was known (ie, acute cholecystitis); and in cases where the conversion to conventional laparotomy was necessary, indicating the best incision. RESULTS: The vast majority of patients had inflammatory causes of acute abdomen (82.03%); others causes were hemoperitoneum (11.03%), bowel obstruction (3.25%), perforation of a hollow viscera (1.74%), vascular occlusion (1.3%), and negative laparoscopy (0.65%). CONCLUSION: This study shows that laparotomy was necessary in only 7.14% of the patients. The videolaparoscopic approach was used for diagnosis (99.35%) and treatment (92.86%) of patients with acute abdomen.