Cargando…
Laparoscopic Exploration in the Management of Retroperitoneal Masses
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The isolated finding of a retroperitoneal mass (RM) often represents a diagnostic challenge. Image-guided biopsy is frequently inadequate for diagnosis. With increasing experience, the use of laparoscopy for exploration of an indeterminate RM may provide a minimally invasi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
1999
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3113157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10527333 |
_version_ | 1782205892069949440 |
---|---|
author | Shalhav, Arieh L. Chan, Steve W.H. Bercowsky, Eduardo Elbahnassy, Abdelhamid M. McDougall, Elspeth M. Clayman, Ralph V. |
author_facet | Shalhav, Arieh L. Chan, Steve W.H. Bercowsky, Eduardo Elbahnassy, Abdelhamid M. McDougall, Elspeth M. Clayman, Ralph V. |
author_sort | Shalhav, Arieh L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The isolated finding of a retroperitoneal mass (RM) often represents a diagnostic challenge. Image-guided biopsy is frequently inadequate for diagnosis. With increasing experience, the use of laparoscopy for exploration of an indeterminate RM may provide a minimally invasive alternative to open exploration. Herein, we present a retrospective review of our initial four laparoscopic explorations, comparing our experience to four contemporary open explorations for an RM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 1995 to January 1998, four patients, aged 50 to 62 years old, with an RM of undetermined etiology underwent laparoscopic exploration. Another four patients underwent open exploration at the same hospital. The medical records of these patients were reviewed. RESULTS: The tumors were smaller in the laparoscopic group, averaging 3.7 cm (range 2-6 cm) vs 6.5 cm (range 1-10 cm) in the open group. A definitive diagnosis was obtained for all eight patients. Postoperative complications were observed in one of the laparoscopic explorations, and in three of the open explorations; there was no operative mortality. The blood loss (90 vs 440 ml), fall in hematocrit (5.1 vs 7.8%), time to resumption of a regular diet (3 vs 5 days), amount of morphine sulfate equivalents required for analgesia (128 mg vs 161 mg), time to ambulation (2.3 vs 6 days) and hospital stay (4.8 vs 6 days) were all less among the laparoscopy patients. However, the operative time was longer for the laparoscopic procedure; this time included stent placement and patient repositioning in addition to the time for laparoscopic excision of the mass (7.8 vs 4.3 hours). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic exploration appears to be a viable alternative to open exploration in patients presenting with a retroperitoneal mass. It is as effective as an open procedure and provides benefits with regard to patient morbidity and convalescence. However, operative time for this laparoscopic procedure is lengthy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3113157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1999 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31131572011-07-12 Laparoscopic Exploration in the Management of Retroperitoneal Masses Shalhav, Arieh L. Chan, Steve W.H. Bercowsky, Eduardo Elbahnassy, Abdelhamid M. McDougall, Elspeth M. Clayman, Ralph V. JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The isolated finding of a retroperitoneal mass (RM) often represents a diagnostic challenge. Image-guided biopsy is frequently inadequate for diagnosis. With increasing experience, the use of laparoscopy for exploration of an indeterminate RM may provide a minimally invasive alternative to open exploration. Herein, we present a retrospective review of our initial four laparoscopic explorations, comparing our experience to four contemporary open explorations for an RM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 1995 to January 1998, four patients, aged 50 to 62 years old, with an RM of undetermined etiology underwent laparoscopic exploration. Another four patients underwent open exploration at the same hospital. The medical records of these patients were reviewed. RESULTS: The tumors were smaller in the laparoscopic group, averaging 3.7 cm (range 2-6 cm) vs 6.5 cm (range 1-10 cm) in the open group. A definitive diagnosis was obtained for all eight patients. Postoperative complications were observed in one of the laparoscopic explorations, and in three of the open explorations; there was no operative mortality. The blood loss (90 vs 440 ml), fall in hematocrit (5.1 vs 7.8%), time to resumption of a regular diet (3 vs 5 days), amount of morphine sulfate equivalents required for analgesia (128 mg vs 161 mg), time to ambulation (2.3 vs 6 days) and hospital stay (4.8 vs 6 days) were all less among the laparoscopy patients. However, the operative time was longer for the laparoscopic procedure; this time included stent placement and patient repositioning in addition to the time for laparoscopic excision of the mass (7.8 vs 4.3 hours). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic exploration appears to be a viable alternative to open exploration in patients presenting with a retroperitoneal mass. It is as effective as an open procedure and provides benefits with regard to patient morbidity and convalescence. However, operative time for this laparoscopic procedure is lengthy. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 1999 /pmc/articles/PMC3113157/ /pubmed/10527333 Text en © 1999 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Papers Shalhav, Arieh L. Chan, Steve W.H. Bercowsky, Eduardo Elbahnassy, Abdelhamid M. McDougall, Elspeth M. Clayman, Ralph V. Laparoscopic Exploration in the Management of Retroperitoneal Masses |
title | Laparoscopic Exploration in the Management of Retroperitoneal Masses |
title_full | Laparoscopic Exploration in the Management of Retroperitoneal Masses |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic Exploration in the Management of Retroperitoneal Masses |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic Exploration in the Management of Retroperitoneal Masses |
title_short | Laparoscopic Exploration in the Management of Retroperitoneal Masses |
title_sort | laparoscopic exploration in the management of retroperitoneal masses |
topic | Scientific Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3113157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10527333 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shalhavariehl laparoscopicexplorationinthemanagementofretroperitonealmasses AT chanstevewh laparoscopicexplorationinthemanagementofretroperitonealmasses AT bercowskyeduardo laparoscopicexplorationinthemanagementofretroperitonealmasses AT elbahnassyabdelhamidm laparoscopicexplorationinthemanagementofretroperitonealmasses AT mcdougallelspethm laparoscopicexplorationinthemanagementofretroperitonealmasses AT claymanralphv laparoscopicexplorationinthemanagementofretroperitonealmasses |