Cargando…
The Strong Protective Effect of Circumcision against Cancer of the Penis
Male circumcision protects against cancer of the penis, the invasive form of which is a devastating disease confined almost exclusively to uncircumcised men. Major etiological factors are phimosis, balanitis, and high-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV), which are more prevalent in the glans pe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3113366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21687572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/812368 |
_version_ | 1782205931165057024 |
---|---|
author | Morris, Brian J. Gray, Ronald H. Castellsague, Xavier Bosch, F. Xavier Halperin, Daniel T. Waskett, Jake H. Hankins, Catherine A. |
author_facet | Morris, Brian J. Gray, Ronald H. Castellsague, Xavier Bosch, F. Xavier Halperin, Daniel T. Waskett, Jake H. Hankins, Catherine A. |
author_sort | Morris, Brian J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Male circumcision protects against cancer of the penis, the invasive form of which is a devastating disease confined almost exclusively to uncircumcised men. Major etiological factors are phimosis, balanitis, and high-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV), which are more prevalent in the glans penis and coronal sulcus covered by the foreskin, as well as on the penile shaft, of uncircumcised men. Circumcised men clear HPV infections more quickly. Phimosis (a constricted foreskin opening impeding the passage of urine) is confined to uncircumcised men, in whom balanitis (affecting 10%) is more common than in circumcised men. Each is strongly associated with risk of penile cancer. These findings have led to calls for promotion of male circumcision, especially in infancy, to help reduce the global burden of penile cancer. Even more relevant globally is protection from cervical cancer, which is 10-times more common, being much higher in women with uncircumcised male partners. Male circumcision also provides indirect protection against various other infections in women, along with direct protection for men from a number of genital tract infections, including HIV. Given that adverse consequences of medical male circumcision, especially when performed in infancy, are rare, this simple prophylactic procedure should be promoted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3113366 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31133662011-06-17 The Strong Protective Effect of Circumcision against Cancer of the Penis Morris, Brian J. Gray, Ronald H. Castellsague, Xavier Bosch, F. Xavier Halperin, Daniel T. Waskett, Jake H. Hankins, Catherine A. Adv Urol Review Article Male circumcision protects against cancer of the penis, the invasive form of which is a devastating disease confined almost exclusively to uncircumcised men. Major etiological factors are phimosis, balanitis, and high-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV), which are more prevalent in the glans penis and coronal sulcus covered by the foreskin, as well as on the penile shaft, of uncircumcised men. Circumcised men clear HPV infections more quickly. Phimosis (a constricted foreskin opening impeding the passage of urine) is confined to uncircumcised men, in whom balanitis (affecting 10%) is more common than in circumcised men. Each is strongly associated with risk of penile cancer. These findings have led to calls for promotion of male circumcision, especially in infancy, to help reduce the global burden of penile cancer. Even more relevant globally is protection from cervical cancer, which is 10-times more common, being much higher in women with uncircumcised male partners. Male circumcision also provides indirect protection against various other infections in women, along with direct protection for men from a number of genital tract infections, including HIV. Given that adverse consequences of medical male circumcision, especially when performed in infancy, are rare, this simple prophylactic procedure should be promoted. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3113366/ /pubmed/21687572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/812368 Text en Copyright © 2011 Brian J. Morris et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Morris, Brian J. Gray, Ronald H. Castellsague, Xavier Bosch, F. Xavier Halperin, Daniel T. Waskett, Jake H. Hankins, Catherine A. The Strong Protective Effect of Circumcision against Cancer of the Penis |
title | The Strong Protective Effect of Circumcision against Cancer of the Penis |
title_full | The Strong Protective Effect of Circumcision against Cancer of the Penis |
title_fullStr | The Strong Protective Effect of Circumcision against Cancer of the Penis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Strong Protective Effect of Circumcision against Cancer of the Penis |
title_short | The Strong Protective Effect of Circumcision against Cancer of the Penis |
title_sort | strong protective effect of circumcision against cancer of the penis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3113366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21687572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/812368 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morrisbrianj thestrongprotectiveeffectofcircumcisionagainstcancerofthepenis AT grayronaldh thestrongprotectiveeffectofcircumcisionagainstcancerofthepenis AT castellsaguexavier thestrongprotectiveeffectofcircumcisionagainstcancerofthepenis AT boschfxavier thestrongprotectiveeffectofcircumcisionagainstcancerofthepenis AT halperindanielt thestrongprotectiveeffectofcircumcisionagainstcancerofthepenis AT waskettjakeh thestrongprotectiveeffectofcircumcisionagainstcancerofthepenis AT hankinscatherinea thestrongprotectiveeffectofcircumcisionagainstcancerofthepenis AT morrisbrianj strongprotectiveeffectofcircumcisionagainstcancerofthepenis AT grayronaldh strongprotectiveeffectofcircumcisionagainstcancerofthepenis AT castellsaguexavier strongprotectiveeffectofcircumcisionagainstcancerofthepenis AT boschfxavier strongprotectiveeffectofcircumcisionagainstcancerofthepenis AT halperindanielt strongprotectiveeffectofcircumcisionagainstcancerofthepenis AT waskettjakeh strongprotectiveeffectofcircumcisionagainstcancerofthepenis AT hankinscatherinea strongprotectiveeffectofcircumcisionagainstcancerofthepenis |