Cargando…
Should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3?
BACKGROUND: Single blastocyst transfer has the advantage of maximizing the fresh single pregnancy rate. However, in patients with a low number of good quality embryos on day 3, it remains unclear whether immediate embryo transfer or further embryo culture with blastocyst transfer is the most prefera...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3113931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21545714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-9-60 |
_version_ | 1782206006372073472 |
---|---|
author | Stoop, Dominic Van Landuyt, Lisbet Van den Abbeel, Etienne Camus, Michel Verheyen, Greta Devroey, Paul |
author_facet | Stoop, Dominic Van Landuyt, Lisbet Van den Abbeel, Etienne Camus, Michel Verheyen, Greta Devroey, Paul |
author_sort | Stoop, Dominic |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Single blastocyst transfer has the advantage of maximizing the fresh single pregnancy rate. However, in patients with a low number of good quality embryos on day 3, it remains unclear whether immediate embryo transfer or further embryo culture with blastocyst transfer is the most preferable option. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out in which the outcome of 590 fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles over a 15 months period and their cryo cycles were analyzed. A total of 341 patients cycles had an elective day 5 strategy independent of intermediate embryo evaluation while another 249 patients underwent a day 5 embryo transfer only if at least four embryos were available on day 3. Blastocyst vitrification was performed using a closed high security system. RESULTS: Demographics, stimulation parameters and embryological data were comparable in the two groups. Patients in the elective day 5 group had a lower fresh transfer rate (90.62% vs. 95.18%, p < 0.05) as compared to patients with a day 3 or day 5 embryo transfer policy. No difference was observed in the fresh live birth rate and multiple pregnancy rate per initiated cycle (32.84% vs. 28.92%; 1.17% vs 0%) The projected cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate compensating for double counting in case subjects have more than one pregnancy is not different (42.58% vs. 39.84%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite lower fresh transfer rates, elective single blastocyst transfer yields a similar projected cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate as in a policy with cleavage stage or blastocyst transfer depending on a good quality embryo count on day 3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3113931 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31139312011-06-14 Should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3? Stoop, Dominic Van Landuyt, Lisbet Van den Abbeel, Etienne Camus, Michel Verheyen, Greta Devroey, Paul Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Single blastocyst transfer has the advantage of maximizing the fresh single pregnancy rate. However, in patients with a low number of good quality embryos on day 3, it remains unclear whether immediate embryo transfer or further embryo culture with blastocyst transfer is the most preferable option. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out in which the outcome of 590 fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles over a 15 months period and their cryo cycles were analyzed. A total of 341 patients cycles had an elective day 5 strategy independent of intermediate embryo evaluation while another 249 patients underwent a day 5 embryo transfer only if at least four embryos were available on day 3. Blastocyst vitrification was performed using a closed high security system. RESULTS: Demographics, stimulation parameters and embryological data were comparable in the two groups. Patients in the elective day 5 group had a lower fresh transfer rate (90.62% vs. 95.18%, p < 0.05) as compared to patients with a day 3 or day 5 embryo transfer policy. No difference was observed in the fresh live birth rate and multiple pregnancy rate per initiated cycle (32.84% vs. 28.92%; 1.17% vs 0%) The projected cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate compensating for double counting in case subjects have more than one pregnancy is not different (42.58% vs. 39.84%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite lower fresh transfer rates, elective single blastocyst transfer yields a similar projected cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate as in a policy with cleavage stage or blastocyst transfer depending on a good quality embryo count on day 3. BioMed Central 2011-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3113931/ /pubmed/21545714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-9-60 Text en Copyright ©2011 Stoop et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Stoop, Dominic Van Landuyt, Lisbet Van den Abbeel, Etienne Camus, Michel Verheyen, Greta Devroey, Paul Should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3? |
title | Should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3? |
title_full | Should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3? |
title_fullStr | Should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3? |
title_full_unstemmed | Should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3? |
title_short | Should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3? |
title_sort | should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3113931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21545714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-9-60 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stoopdominic shouldasingleblastocysttransferpolicybeaclinicaldecisionorshoulditdependontheembryologicalevaluationonday3 AT vanlanduytlisbet shouldasingleblastocysttransferpolicybeaclinicaldecisionorshoulditdependontheembryologicalevaluationonday3 AT vandenabbeeletienne shouldasingleblastocysttransferpolicybeaclinicaldecisionorshoulditdependontheembryologicalevaluationonday3 AT camusmichel shouldasingleblastocysttransferpolicybeaclinicaldecisionorshoulditdependontheembryologicalevaluationonday3 AT verheyengreta shouldasingleblastocysttransferpolicybeaclinicaldecisionorshoulditdependontheembryologicalevaluationonday3 AT devroeypaul shouldasingleblastocysttransferpolicybeaclinicaldecisionorshoulditdependontheembryologicalevaluationonday3 |