Cargando…

Impact of Intranasal Insulin on Insulin Antibody Affinity and Isotypes in Young Children With HLA-Conferred Susceptibility to Type 1 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE: Despite promising results from studies on mouse models, intranasal insulin failed to prevent or delay the development of type 1 diabetes in autoantibody-positive children with HLA-conferred disease susceptibility. To analyze whether the insulin dose was inadequate to elicit an immunomodul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryhänen, Samppa J., Härkönen, Taina, Siljander, Heli, Näntö-Salonen, Kirsti, Simell, Tuula, Hyöty, Heikki, Ilonen, Jorma, Veijola, Riitta, Simell, Olli, Knip, Mikael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3114329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21515841
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc10-1449
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Despite promising results from studies on mouse models, intranasal insulin failed to prevent or delay the development of type 1 diabetes in autoantibody-positive children with HLA-conferred disease susceptibility. To analyze whether the insulin dose was inadequate to elicit an immunomodulatory response, we compared the changes observed in insulin antibody (IA) affinity and isotypes after treatment with nasal insulin or placebo. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Ninety-five children (47 in the placebo group and 48 in the insulin group of the total of 224 children randomized for the trial) with HLA-conferred susceptibility to type 1 diabetes derived from the intervention arm of the Finnish Type 1 Diabetes Prediction and Prevention study were included in these analyses. Blood samples drawn before or at the beginning of the treatment and after treatment for 3 and 6 months were analyzed for IA affinity and isotype-specific IAs (IgG1–4, IgA, IgM, and IgE). RESULTS: IgG3- and IgA-IA levels (P = 0.031 and 0.015, respectively) and the number of IgG3-IA–positive subjects (P = 0.022) were significantly higher at 6 months after the initiation of the treatment in the insulin group. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in IA affinity or other IA isotypes. CONCLUSIONS: The insulin dose administered induced a modest change in the IA isotype profile. The lack of impact of nasal insulin on IA affinity implies that the immune response of study subjects was already mature at the beginning of the intervention.