Cargando…
Enhancing Credibility of Chemical Safety Studies: Emerging Consensus on Key Assessment Criteria
OBJECTIVES: We examined the extent to which consensus exists on the criteria that should be used for assessing the credibility of a scientific work, regardless of its funding source, and explored how these criteria might be implemented. DATA SOURCES: Three publications, all presented at a session of...
Autores principales: | Conrad, James W., Becker, Richard A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3114808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21163723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002737 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Enhancing Credibility of Chemical Safety Studies: No Consensus
por: Tweedale, Tony
Publicado: (2011) -
Assessing the Reliability and Credibility of Industry Science and Scientists
por: Barrow, Craig S., et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Credibility of Scientists: Barrow and Conrad Respond
por: Barrow, Craig S., et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Chemical Safety Studies: Conrad and Becker Respond
por: Conrad, James W., et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Credibility and advocacy in conservation science
por: Horton, Cristi C., et al.
Publicado: (2015)