Cargando…

Robust Transient Dynamics and Brain Functions

In the last few decades several concepts of dynamical systems theory (DST) have guided psychologists, cognitive scientists, and neuroscientists to rethink about sensory motor behavior and embodied cognition. A critical step in the progress of DST application to the brain (supported by modern methods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rabinovich, Mikhail I., Varona, Pablo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3116137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21716642
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2011.00024
_version_ 1782206223322447872
author Rabinovich, Mikhail I.
Varona, Pablo
author_facet Rabinovich, Mikhail I.
Varona, Pablo
author_sort Rabinovich, Mikhail I.
collection PubMed
description In the last few decades several concepts of dynamical systems theory (DST) have guided psychologists, cognitive scientists, and neuroscientists to rethink about sensory motor behavior and embodied cognition. A critical step in the progress of DST application to the brain (supported by modern methods of brain imaging and multi-electrode recording techniques) has been the transfer of its initial success in motor behavior to mental function, i.e., perception, emotion, and cognition. Open questions from research in genetics, ecology, brain sciences, etc., have changed DST itself and lead to the discovery of a new dynamical phenomenon, i.e., reproducible and robust transients that are at the same time sensitive to informational signals. The goal of this review is to describe a new mathematical framework – heteroclinic sequential dynamics – to understand self-organized activity in the brain that can explain certain aspects of robust itinerant behavior. Specifically, we discuss a hierarchy of coarse-grain models of mental dynamics in the form of kinetic equations of modes. These modes compete for resources at three levels: (i) within the same modality, (ii) among different modalities from the same family (like perception), and (iii) among modalities from different families (like emotion and cognition). The analysis of the conditions for robustness, i.e., the structural stability of transient (sequential) dynamics, give us the possibility to explain phenomena like the finite capacity of our sequential working memory – a vital cognitive function –, and to find specific dynamical signatures – different kinds of instabilities – of several brain functions and mental diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3116137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31161372011-06-28 Robust Transient Dynamics and Brain Functions Rabinovich, Mikhail I. Varona, Pablo Front Comput Neurosci Neuroscience In the last few decades several concepts of dynamical systems theory (DST) have guided psychologists, cognitive scientists, and neuroscientists to rethink about sensory motor behavior and embodied cognition. A critical step in the progress of DST application to the brain (supported by modern methods of brain imaging and multi-electrode recording techniques) has been the transfer of its initial success in motor behavior to mental function, i.e., perception, emotion, and cognition. Open questions from research in genetics, ecology, brain sciences, etc., have changed DST itself and lead to the discovery of a new dynamical phenomenon, i.e., reproducible and robust transients that are at the same time sensitive to informational signals. The goal of this review is to describe a new mathematical framework – heteroclinic sequential dynamics – to understand self-organized activity in the brain that can explain certain aspects of robust itinerant behavior. Specifically, we discuss a hierarchy of coarse-grain models of mental dynamics in the form of kinetic equations of modes. These modes compete for resources at three levels: (i) within the same modality, (ii) among different modalities from the same family (like perception), and (iii) among modalities from different families (like emotion and cognition). The analysis of the conditions for robustness, i.e., the structural stability of transient (sequential) dynamics, give us the possibility to explain phenomena like the finite capacity of our sequential working memory – a vital cognitive function –, and to find specific dynamical signatures – different kinds of instabilities – of several brain functions and mental diseases. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3116137/ /pubmed/21716642 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2011.00024 Text en Copyright © 2011 Rabinovich and Varona. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Rabinovich, Mikhail I.
Varona, Pablo
Robust Transient Dynamics and Brain Functions
title Robust Transient Dynamics and Brain Functions
title_full Robust Transient Dynamics and Brain Functions
title_fullStr Robust Transient Dynamics and Brain Functions
title_full_unstemmed Robust Transient Dynamics and Brain Functions
title_short Robust Transient Dynamics and Brain Functions
title_sort robust transient dynamics and brain functions
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3116137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21716642
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2011.00024
work_keys_str_mv AT rabinovichmikhaili robusttransientdynamicsandbrainfunctions
AT varonapablo robusttransientdynamicsandbrainfunctions