Cargando…

The Different Muscle-Energetics during Shortening and Stretch

The helical shape of the thin filaments causes their passive counterclockwise rotation during muscle stretch that increases tensile stress and torque at first by unwinding and then by winding up the four anchoring Z-filaments. This means storage of energy in the series elastic Z-filaments and a cons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jarosch, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3116162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21686156
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms12052891
_version_ 1782206227404554240
author Jarosch, Robert
author_facet Jarosch, Robert
author_sort Jarosch, Robert
collection PubMed
description The helical shape of the thin filaments causes their passive counterclockwise rotation during muscle stretch that increases tensile stress and torque at first by unwinding and then by winding up the four anchoring Z-filaments. This means storage of energy in the series elastic Z-filaments and a considerable decrease of the liberated energy of heat and work to (h—w(ap)), where h is the heat energy and w(ap) the stretch energy induced from outside by an apparatus. The steep thin filament helix with an inclination angle of 70° promotes the passive rotation during stretch, but impedes the smooth sliding of shortening by increased friction and production of frictional heat. The frictional heat may be produced by the contact with the myosin cross-bridges: (1) when they passively snap on drilling thin filaments from cleft to cleft over a distance 2 × 2.7 nm = 5.4 nm between the globular actin monomers in one groove, causing stepwise motion; or (2) when they passively cycle from one helical groove to the next (distance 36 nm). The latter causes more heat and may take place on rotating thin filaments without an effective forward drilling (“idle rotation”), e.g., when they produce “unexplained heat” at the beginning of an isometric tetanus. In an Appendix to this paper the different states of muscle are defined. The function of its most important components is described and rotation model and power-stroke model of muscular contraction is compared.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3116162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31161622011-06-16 The Different Muscle-Energetics during Shortening and Stretch Jarosch, Robert Int J Mol Sci Review The helical shape of the thin filaments causes their passive counterclockwise rotation during muscle stretch that increases tensile stress and torque at first by unwinding and then by winding up the four anchoring Z-filaments. This means storage of energy in the series elastic Z-filaments and a considerable decrease of the liberated energy of heat and work to (h—w(ap)), where h is the heat energy and w(ap) the stretch energy induced from outside by an apparatus. The steep thin filament helix with an inclination angle of 70° promotes the passive rotation during stretch, but impedes the smooth sliding of shortening by increased friction and production of frictional heat. The frictional heat may be produced by the contact with the myosin cross-bridges: (1) when they passively snap on drilling thin filaments from cleft to cleft over a distance 2 × 2.7 nm = 5.4 nm between the globular actin monomers in one groove, causing stepwise motion; or (2) when they passively cycle from one helical groove to the next (distance 36 nm). The latter causes more heat and may take place on rotating thin filaments without an effective forward drilling (“idle rotation”), e.g., when they produce “unexplained heat” at the beginning of an isometric tetanus. In an Appendix to this paper the different states of muscle are defined. The function of its most important components is described and rotation model and power-stroke model of muscular contraction is compared. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2011-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3116162/ /pubmed/21686156 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms12052891 Text en © 2011 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Jarosch, Robert
The Different Muscle-Energetics during Shortening and Stretch
title The Different Muscle-Energetics during Shortening and Stretch
title_full The Different Muscle-Energetics during Shortening and Stretch
title_fullStr The Different Muscle-Energetics during Shortening and Stretch
title_full_unstemmed The Different Muscle-Energetics during Shortening and Stretch
title_short The Different Muscle-Energetics during Shortening and Stretch
title_sort different muscle-energetics during shortening and stretch
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3116162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21686156
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms12052891
work_keys_str_mv AT jaroschrobert thedifferentmuscleenergeticsduringshorteningandstretch
AT jaroschrobert differentmuscleenergeticsduringshorteningandstretch