Cargando…

Histone variant macroH2A confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming

How various layers of epigenetic repression restrict somatic cell nuclear reprogramming is poorly understood. The transfer of mammalian somatic cell nuclei into Xenopus oocytes induces transcriptional reprogramming of previously repressed genes. Here, we address the mechanisms that restrict reprogra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pasque, Vincent, Gillich, Astrid, Garrett, Nigel, Gurdon, John B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Molecular Biology Organization 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3116279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21552206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.144
_version_ 1782206237553721344
author Pasque, Vincent
Gillich, Astrid
Garrett, Nigel
Gurdon, John B
author_facet Pasque, Vincent
Gillich, Astrid
Garrett, Nigel
Gurdon, John B
author_sort Pasque, Vincent
collection PubMed
description How various layers of epigenetic repression restrict somatic cell nuclear reprogramming is poorly understood. The transfer of mammalian somatic cell nuclei into Xenopus oocytes induces transcriptional reprogramming of previously repressed genes. Here, we address the mechanisms that restrict reprogramming following nuclear transfer by assessing the stability of the inactive X chromosome (Xi) in different stages of inactivation. We find that the Xi of mouse post-implantation-derived epiblast stem cells (EpiSCs) can be reversed by nuclear transfer, while the Xi of differentiated or extraembryonic cells is irreversible by nuclear transfer to oocytes. After nuclear transfer, Xist RNA is lost from chromatin of the Xi. Most epigenetic marks such as DNA methylation and Polycomb-deposited H3K27me3 do not explain the differences between reversible and irreversible Xi. Resistance to reprogramming is associated with incorporation of the histone variant macroH2A, which is retained on the Xi of differentiated cells, but absent from the Xi of EpiSCs. Our results uncover the decreased stability of the Xi in EpiSCs, and highlight the importance of combinatorial epigenetic repression involving macroH2A in restricting transcriptional reprogramming by oocytes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3116279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher European Molecular Biology Organization
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31162792011-08-11 Histone variant macroH2A confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming Pasque, Vincent Gillich, Astrid Garrett, Nigel Gurdon, John B EMBO J Article How various layers of epigenetic repression restrict somatic cell nuclear reprogramming is poorly understood. The transfer of mammalian somatic cell nuclei into Xenopus oocytes induces transcriptional reprogramming of previously repressed genes. Here, we address the mechanisms that restrict reprogramming following nuclear transfer by assessing the stability of the inactive X chromosome (Xi) in different stages of inactivation. We find that the Xi of mouse post-implantation-derived epiblast stem cells (EpiSCs) can be reversed by nuclear transfer, while the Xi of differentiated or extraembryonic cells is irreversible by nuclear transfer to oocytes. After nuclear transfer, Xist RNA is lost from chromatin of the Xi. Most epigenetic marks such as DNA methylation and Polycomb-deposited H3K27me3 do not explain the differences between reversible and irreversible Xi. Resistance to reprogramming is associated with incorporation of the histone variant macroH2A, which is retained on the Xi of differentiated cells, but absent from the Xi of EpiSCs. Our results uncover the decreased stability of the Xi in EpiSCs, and highlight the importance of combinatorial epigenetic repression involving macroH2A in restricting transcriptional reprogramming by oocytes. European Molecular Biology Organization 2011-06-15 2011-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3116279/ /pubmed/21552206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.144 Text en Copyright © 2011, European Molecular Biology Organization https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial Share Alike 3.0 Unported License, which allows readers to alter, transform, or build upon the article and then distribute the resulting work under the same or similar license to this one. The work must be attributed back to the original author and commercial use is not permitted without specific permission.
spellingShingle Article
Pasque, Vincent
Gillich, Astrid
Garrett, Nigel
Gurdon, John B
Histone variant macroH2A confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming
title Histone variant macroH2A confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming
title_full Histone variant macroH2A confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming
title_fullStr Histone variant macroH2A confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming
title_full_unstemmed Histone variant macroH2A confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming
title_short Histone variant macroH2A confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming
title_sort histone variant macroh2a confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3116279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21552206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.144
work_keys_str_mv AT pasquevincent histonevariantmacroh2aconfersresistancetonuclearreprogramming
AT gillichastrid histonevariantmacroh2aconfersresistancetonuclearreprogramming
AT garrettnigel histonevariantmacroh2aconfersresistancetonuclearreprogramming
AT gurdonjohnb histonevariantmacroh2aconfersresistancetonuclearreprogramming