Cargando…
Histone variant macroH2A confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming
How various layers of epigenetic repression restrict somatic cell nuclear reprogramming is poorly understood. The transfer of mammalian somatic cell nuclei into Xenopus oocytes induces transcriptional reprogramming of previously repressed genes. Here, we address the mechanisms that restrict reprogra...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Molecular Biology Organization
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3116279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21552206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.144 |
_version_ | 1782206237553721344 |
---|---|
author | Pasque, Vincent Gillich, Astrid Garrett, Nigel Gurdon, John B |
author_facet | Pasque, Vincent Gillich, Astrid Garrett, Nigel Gurdon, John B |
author_sort | Pasque, Vincent |
collection | PubMed |
description | How various layers of epigenetic repression restrict somatic cell nuclear reprogramming is poorly understood. The transfer of mammalian somatic cell nuclei into Xenopus oocytes induces transcriptional reprogramming of previously repressed genes. Here, we address the mechanisms that restrict reprogramming following nuclear transfer by assessing the stability of the inactive X chromosome (Xi) in different stages of inactivation. We find that the Xi of mouse post-implantation-derived epiblast stem cells (EpiSCs) can be reversed by nuclear transfer, while the Xi of differentiated or extraembryonic cells is irreversible by nuclear transfer to oocytes. After nuclear transfer, Xist RNA is lost from chromatin of the Xi. Most epigenetic marks such as DNA methylation and Polycomb-deposited H3K27me3 do not explain the differences between reversible and irreversible Xi. Resistance to reprogramming is associated with incorporation of the histone variant macroH2A, which is retained on the Xi of differentiated cells, but absent from the Xi of EpiSCs. Our results uncover the decreased stability of the Xi in EpiSCs, and highlight the importance of combinatorial epigenetic repression involving macroH2A in restricting transcriptional reprogramming by oocytes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3116279 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | European Molecular Biology Organization |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31162792011-08-11 Histone variant macroH2A confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming Pasque, Vincent Gillich, Astrid Garrett, Nigel Gurdon, John B EMBO J Article How various layers of epigenetic repression restrict somatic cell nuclear reprogramming is poorly understood. The transfer of mammalian somatic cell nuclei into Xenopus oocytes induces transcriptional reprogramming of previously repressed genes. Here, we address the mechanisms that restrict reprogramming following nuclear transfer by assessing the stability of the inactive X chromosome (Xi) in different stages of inactivation. We find that the Xi of mouse post-implantation-derived epiblast stem cells (EpiSCs) can be reversed by nuclear transfer, while the Xi of differentiated or extraembryonic cells is irreversible by nuclear transfer to oocytes. After nuclear transfer, Xist RNA is lost from chromatin of the Xi. Most epigenetic marks such as DNA methylation and Polycomb-deposited H3K27me3 do not explain the differences between reversible and irreversible Xi. Resistance to reprogramming is associated with incorporation of the histone variant macroH2A, which is retained on the Xi of differentiated cells, but absent from the Xi of EpiSCs. Our results uncover the decreased stability of the Xi in EpiSCs, and highlight the importance of combinatorial epigenetic repression involving macroH2A in restricting transcriptional reprogramming by oocytes. European Molecular Biology Organization 2011-06-15 2011-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3116279/ /pubmed/21552206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.144 Text en Copyright © 2011, European Molecular Biology Organization https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial Share Alike 3.0 Unported License, which allows readers to alter, transform, or build upon the article and then distribute the resulting work under the same or similar license to this one. The work must be attributed back to the original author and commercial use is not permitted without specific permission. |
spellingShingle | Article Pasque, Vincent Gillich, Astrid Garrett, Nigel Gurdon, John B Histone variant macroH2A confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming |
title | Histone variant macroH2A confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming |
title_full | Histone variant macroH2A confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming |
title_fullStr | Histone variant macroH2A confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming |
title_full_unstemmed | Histone variant macroH2A confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming |
title_short | Histone variant macroH2A confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming |
title_sort | histone variant macroh2a confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3116279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21552206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.144 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pasquevincent histonevariantmacroh2aconfersresistancetonuclearreprogramming AT gillichastrid histonevariantmacroh2aconfersresistancetonuclearreprogramming AT garrettnigel histonevariantmacroh2aconfersresistancetonuclearreprogramming AT gurdonjohnb histonevariantmacroh2aconfersresistancetonuclearreprogramming |