Cargando…

Experience with the Pascal(®) photocoagulator: An analysis of over 1200 laser procedures with regard to parameter refinement

AIM: To systematically refine and recommend parameter settings of spot size, power, and treatment duration using the Pascal(®) photocoagulator, a multi-spot, semi-automated, short-duration laser system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective consecutive series with 752 Caucasian eyes and 1242 laser...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheth, Saumil, Lanzetta, Paolo, Veritti, Daniele, Zucchiatti, Ilaria, Savorgnani, Carola, Bandello, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3116566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21350276
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.77007
_version_ 1782206265287507968
author Sheth, Saumil
Lanzetta, Paolo
Veritti, Daniele
Zucchiatti, Ilaria
Savorgnani, Carola
Bandello, Francesco
author_facet Sheth, Saumil
Lanzetta, Paolo
Veritti, Daniele
Zucchiatti, Ilaria
Savorgnani, Carola
Bandello, Francesco
author_sort Sheth, Saumil
collection PubMed
description AIM: To systematically refine and recommend parameter settings of spot size, power, and treatment duration using the Pascal(®) photocoagulator, a multi-spot, semi-automated, short-duration laser system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective consecutive series with 752 Caucasian eyes and 1242 laser procedures over two years were grouped into, (1) 374 macular focal / grid photocoagulation (FP), (2), 666 panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), and (3) 202 barrage photocoagulation (BP). Parameters for power, duration, spot number, and spot size were recorded for every group. RESULTS: Power parameters for all groups showed a non-gaussian distribution; FP group, median 190 mW, range 100 – 950 mW, and PRP group, median 800 mW, range 100 – 2000 mW. On subgroup comparison, for similar spot size, as treatment duration decreased, the power required increased, albeit in a much lesser proportion than that given by energy = power × time. Most frequently used patterns were single spot (89% of cases) in FP, 5 × 5 box (72%) in PRP, and 2 × 2 box (78%) in BP. Spot diameters as high as ≈ 700 μm on retina were given in the PRP group. Single session PRP was attempted in six eyes with a median spot count of 3500. CONCLUSION: Overall, due to the small duration of its pulse, the Pascal(®) photocoagulator tends to use higher powers, although much lower cumulative energies, than those used in a conventional laser. The consequent lesser heat dissipation, especially lateral, can allow one to use relatively larger spot sizes and give more closely spaced burns, without incurring significant side effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3116566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31165662011-06-21 Experience with the Pascal(®) photocoagulator: An analysis of over 1200 laser procedures with regard to parameter refinement Sheth, Saumil Lanzetta, Paolo Veritti, Daniele Zucchiatti, Ilaria Savorgnani, Carola Bandello, Francesco Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article AIM: To systematically refine and recommend parameter settings of spot size, power, and treatment duration using the Pascal(®) photocoagulator, a multi-spot, semi-automated, short-duration laser system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective consecutive series with 752 Caucasian eyes and 1242 laser procedures over two years were grouped into, (1) 374 macular focal / grid photocoagulation (FP), (2), 666 panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), and (3) 202 barrage photocoagulation (BP). Parameters for power, duration, spot number, and spot size were recorded for every group. RESULTS: Power parameters for all groups showed a non-gaussian distribution; FP group, median 190 mW, range 100 – 950 mW, and PRP group, median 800 mW, range 100 – 2000 mW. On subgroup comparison, for similar spot size, as treatment duration decreased, the power required increased, albeit in a much lesser proportion than that given by energy = power × time. Most frequently used patterns were single spot (89% of cases) in FP, 5 × 5 box (72%) in PRP, and 2 × 2 box (78%) in BP. Spot diameters as high as ≈ 700 μm on retina were given in the PRP group. Single session PRP was attempted in six eyes with a median spot count of 3500. CONCLUSION: Overall, due to the small duration of its pulse, the Pascal(®) photocoagulator tends to use higher powers, although much lower cumulative energies, than those used in a conventional laser. The consequent lesser heat dissipation, especially lateral, can allow one to use relatively larger spot sizes and give more closely spaced burns, without incurring significant side effects. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3116566/ /pubmed/21350276 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.77007 Text en © Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sheth, Saumil
Lanzetta, Paolo
Veritti, Daniele
Zucchiatti, Ilaria
Savorgnani, Carola
Bandello, Francesco
Experience with the Pascal(®) photocoagulator: An analysis of over 1200 laser procedures with regard to parameter refinement
title Experience with the Pascal(®) photocoagulator: An analysis of over 1200 laser procedures with regard to parameter refinement
title_full Experience with the Pascal(®) photocoagulator: An analysis of over 1200 laser procedures with regard to parameter refinement
title_fullStr Experience with the Pascal(®) photocoagulator: An analysis of over 1200 laser procedures with regard to parameter refinement
title_full_unstemmed Experience with the Pascal(®) photocoagulator: An analysis of over 1200 laser procedures with regard to parameter refinement
title_short Experience with the Pascal(®) photocoagulator: An analysis of over 1200 laser procedures with regard to parameter refinement
title_sort experience with the pascal(®) photocoagulator: an analysis of over 1200 laser procedures with regard to parameter refinement
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3116566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21350276
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.77007
work_keys_str_mv AT shethsaumil experiencewiththepascalphotocoagulatorananalysisofover1200laserprocedureswithregardtoparameterrefinement
AT lanzettapaolo experiencewiththepascalphotocoagulatorananalysisofover1200laserprocedureswithregardtoparameterrefinement
AT verittidaniele experiencewiththepascalphotocoagulatorananalysisofover1200laserprocedureswithregardtoparameterrefinement
AT zucchiattiilaria experiencewiththepascalphotocoagulatorananalysisofover1200laserprocedureswithregardtoparameterrefinement
AT savorgnanicarola experiencewiththepascalphotocoagulatorananalysisofover1200laserprocedureswithregardtoparameterrefinement
AT bandellofrancesco experiencewiththepascalphotocoagulatorananalysisofover1200laserprocedureswithregardtoparameterrefinement