Cargando…

Small sets of interacting proteins suggest functional linkage mechanisms via Bayesian analogical reasoning

Motivation: Proteins and protein complexes coordinate their activity to execute cellular functions. In a number of experimental settings, including synthetic genetic arrays, genetic perturbations and RNAi screens, scientists identify a small set of protein interactions of interest. A working hypothe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Airoldi, Edoardo M., Heller, Katherine A., Silva, Ricardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3117334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21685095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr236
_version_ 1782206317302120448
author Airoldi, Edoardo M.
Heller, Katherine A.
Silva, Ricardo
author_facet Airoldi, Edoardo M.
Heller, Katherine A.
Silva, Ricardo
author_sort Airoldi, Edoardo M.
collection PubMed
description Motivation: Proteins and protein complexes coordinate their activity to execute cellular functions. In a number of experimental settings, including synthetic genetic arrays, genetic perturbations and RNAi screens, scientists identify a small set of protein interactions of interest. A working hypothesis is often that these interactions are the observable phenotypes of some functional process, which is not directly observable. Confirmatory analysis requires finding other pairs of proteins whose interaction may be additional phenotypical evidence about the same functional process. Extant methods for finding additional protein interactions rely heavily on the information in the newly identified set of interactions. For instance, these methods leverage the attributes of the individual proteins directly, in a supervised setting, in order to find relevant protein pairs. A small set of protein interactions provides a small sample to train parameters of prediction methods, thus leading to low confidence. Results: We develop RBSets, a computational approach to ranking protein interactions rooted in analogical reasoning; that is, the ability to learn and generalize relations between objects. Our approach is tailored to situations where the training set of protein interactions is small, and leverages the attributes of the individual proteins indirectly, in a Bayesian ranking setting that is perhaps closest to propensity scoring in mathematical psychology. We find that RBSets leads to good performance in identifying additional interactions starting from a small evidence set of interacting proteins, for which an underlying biological logic in terms of functional processes and signaling pathways can be established with some confidence. Our approach is scalable and can be applied to large databases with minimal computational overhead. Our results suggest that analogical reasoning within a Bayesian ranking problem is a promising new approach for real-time biological discovery. Availability: Java code is available at: www.gatsby.ucl.ac.uk/~rbas. Contact: airoldi@fas.harvard.edu; kheller@mit.edu; ricardo@stats.ucl.ac.uk
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3117334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31173342011-06-17 Small sets of interacting proteins suggest functional linkage mechanisms via Bayesian analogical reasoning Airoldi, Edoardo M. Heller, Katherine A. Silva, Ricardo Bioinformatics Ismb/Eccb 2011 Proceedings Papers Committee July 17 to July 19, 2011, Vienna, Austria Motivation: Proteins and protein complexes coordinate their activity to execute cellular functions. In a number of experimental settings, including synthetic genetic arrays, genetic perturbations and RNAi screens, scientists identify a small set of protein interactions of interest. A working hypothesis is often that these interactions are the observable phenotypes of some functional process, which is not directly observable. Confirmatory analysis requires finding other pairs of proteins whose interaction may be additional phenotypical evidence about the same functional process. Extant methods for finding additional protein interactions rely heavily on the information in the newly identified set of interactions. For instance, these methods leverage the attributes of the individual proteins directly, in a supervised setting, in order to find relevant protein pairs. A small set of protein interactions provides a small sample to train parameters of prediction methods, thus leading to low confidence. Results: We develop RBSets, a computational approach to ranking protein interactions rooted in analogical reasoning; that is, the ability to learn and generalize relations between objects. Our approach is tailored to situations where the training set of protein interactions is small, and leverages the attributes of the individual proteins indirectly, in a Bayesian ranking setting that is perhaps closest to propensity scoring in mathematical psychology. We find that RBSets leads to good performance in identifying additional interactions starting from a small evidence set of interacting proteins, for which an underlying biological logic in terms of functional processes and signaling pathways can be established with some confidence. Our approach is scalable and can be applied to large databases with minimal computational overhead. Our results suggest that analogical reasoning within a Bayesian ranking problem is a promising new approach for real-time biological discovery. Availability: Java code is available at: www.gatsby.ucl.ac.uk/~rbas. Contact: airoldi@fas.harvard.edu; kheller@mit.edu; ricardo@stats.ucl.ac.uk Oxford University Press 2011-07-01 2011-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3117334/ /pubmed/21685095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr236 Text en © The Author(s) 2011. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Ismb/Eccb 2011 Proceedings Papers Committee July 17 to July 19, 2011, Vienna, Austria
Airoldi, Edoardo M.
Heller, Katherine A.
Silva, Ricardo
Small sets of interacting proteins suggest functional linkage mechanisms via Bayesian analogical reasoning
title Small sets of interacting proteins suggest functional linkage mechanisms via Bayesian analogical reasoning
title_full Small sets of interacting proteins suggest functional linkage mechanisms via Bayesian analogical reasoning
title_fullStr Small sets of interacting proteins suggest functional linkage mechanisms via Bayesian analogical reasoning
title_full_unstemmed Small sets of interacting proteins suggest functional linkage mechanisms via Bayesian analogical reasoning
title_short Small sets of interacting proteins suggest functional linkage mechanisms via Bayesian analogical reasoning
title_sort small sets of interacting proteins suggest functional linkage mechanisms via bayesian analogical reasoning
topic Ismb/Eccb 2011 Proceedings Papers Committee July 17 to July 19, 2011, Vienna, Austria
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3117334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21685095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr236
work_keys_str_mv AT airoldiedoardom smallsetsofinteractingproteinssuggestfunctionallinkagemechanismsviabayesiananalogicalreasoning
AT hellerkatherinea smallsetsofinteractingproteinssuggestfunctionallinkagemechanismsviabayesiananalogicalreasoning
AT silvaricardo smallsetsofinteractingproteinssuggestfunctionallinkagemechanismsviabayesiananalogicalreasoning