Cargando…
Adoption of the 2006 Field Triage Decision Scheme for Injured Patients
BACKGROUND: When emergency medical services (EMS) providers respond to the scene of an injury, they must decide where to transport the injured patients for further evaluation and treatment. This is done through a process known as “field triage”, whereby a patient’s injuries are matched to the most a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3117601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21731782 |
_version_ | 1782206343347699712 |
---|---|
author | Sasser, Scott M. Ossmann, Eric Wald, Marlena M. Lerner, E. Brooke Hunt, Richard C. |
author_facet | Sasser, Scott M. Ossmann, Eric Wald, Marlena M. Lerner, E. Brooke Hunt, Richard C. |
author_sort | Sasser, Scott M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: When emergency medical services (EMS) providers respond to the scene of an injury, they must decide where to transport the injured patients for further evaluation and treatment. This is done through a process known as “field triage”, whereby a patient’s injuries are matched to the most appropriate hospital. In 2005–2006 the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, convened by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, revised the 1999 American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma Field Triage Decision Scheme. This revision, the 2006 Field Triage Decision Scheme, was published in 2006. METHODS: State Public Health departments’ and EMS’ external websites were evaluated to ascertain the current status of implementation of the 2006 Field Triage Decision Scheme. RESULTS: Information regarding field triage was located for 41 states. In nine states no information regarding field triage was available on their websites. Of the 41 states where information was located, seven were classified as “full adopters” of the 2006 Field Triage Decision Scheme; nine were considered “partial adopters”; 17 states were found to be using a full version or modification of the 1999 Field Triage Decision Scheme; and eight states were considered to be using a different protocol or scheme for field triage. CONCLUSION: Many states have adopted the 2006 Decision Scheme (full or partial). Further investigation is needed to determine the reasons why some states do not adopt the guidelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3117601 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31176012011-07-01 Adoption of the 2006 Field Triage Decision Scheme for Injured Patients Sasser, Scott M. Ossmann, Eric Wald, Marlena M. Lerner, E. Brooke Hunt, Richard C. West J Emerg Med Injury Control and Response BACKGROUND: When emergency medical services (EMS) providers respond to the scene of an injury, they must decide where to transport the injured patients for further evaluation and treatment. This is done through a process known as “field triage”, whereby a patient’s injuries are matched to the most appropriate hospital. In 2005–2006 the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, convened by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, revised the 1999 American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma Field Triage Decision Scheme. This revision, the 2006 Field Triage Decision Scheme, was published in 2006. METHODS: State Public Health departments’ and EMS’ external websites were evaluated to ascertain the current status of implementation of the 2006 Field Triage Decision Scheme. RESULTS: Information regarding field triage was located for 41 states. In nine states no information regarding field triage was available on their websites. Of the 41 states where information was located, seven were classified as “full adopters” of the 2006 Field Triage Decision Scheme; nine were considered “partial adopters”; 17 states were found to be using a full version or modification of the 1999 Field Triage Decision Scheme; and eight states were considered to be using a different protocol or scheme for field triage. CONCLUSION: Many states have adopted the 2006 Decision Scheme (full or partial). Further investigation is needed to determine the reasons why some states do not adopt the guidelines. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2011-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3117601/ /pubmed/21731782 Text en Copyright © 2011 the authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Injury Control and Response Sasser, Scott M. Ossmann, Eric Wald, Marlena M. Lerner, E. Brooke Hunt, Richard C. Adoption of the 2006 Field Triage Decision Scheme for Injured Patients |
title | Adoption of the 2006 Field Triage Decision Scheme for Injured Patients |
title_full | Adoption of the 2006 Field Triage Decision Scheme for Injured Patients |
title_fullStr | Adoption of the 2006 Field Triage Decision Scheme for Injured Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Adoption of the 2006 Field Triage Decision Scheme for Injured Patients |
title_short | Adoption of the 2006 Field Triage Decision Scheme for Injured Patients |
title_sort | adoption of the 2006 field triage decision scheme for injured patients |
topic | Injury Control and Response |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3117601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21731782 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sasserscottm adoptionofthe2006fieldtriagedecisionschemeforinjuredpatients AT ossmanneric adoptionofthe2006fieldtriagedecisionschemeforinjuredpatients AT waldmarlenam adoptionofthe2006fieldtriagedecisionschemeforinjuredpatients AT lernerebrooke adoptionofthe2006fieldtriagedecisionschemeforinjuredpatients AT huntrichardc adoptionofthe2006fieldtriagedecisionschemeforinjuredpatients |