Cargando…

Isopods Failed to Acclimate Their Thermal Sensitivity of Locomotor Performance during Predictable or Stochastic Cooling

Most organisms experience environments that vary continuously over time, yet researchers generally study phenotypic responses to abrupt and sustained changes in environmental conditions. Gradual environmental changes, whether predictable or stochastic, might affect organisms differently than do abru...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schuler, Matthew S., Cooper, Brandon S., Storm, Jonathan J., Sears, Michael W., Angilletta, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3117853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21698113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020905
_version_ 1782206389285814272
author Schuler, Matthew S.
Cooper, Brandon S.
Storm, Jonathan J.
Sears, Michael W.
Angilletta, Michael J.
author_facet Schuler, Matthew S.
Cooper, Brandon S.
Storm, Jonathan J.
Sears, Michael W.
Angilletta, Michael J.
author_sort Schuler, Matthew S.
collection PubMed
description Most organisms experience environments that vary continuously over time, yet researchers generally study phenotypic responses to abrupt and sustained changes in environmental conditions. Gradual environmental changes, whether predictable or stochastic, might affect organisms differently than do abrupt changes. To explore this possibility, we exposed terrestrial isopods (Porcellio scaber) collected from a highly seasonal environment to four thermal treatments: (1) a constant 20°C; (2) a constant 10°C; (3) a steady decline from 20° to 10°C; and (4) a stochastic decline from 20° to 10°C that mimicked natural conditions during autumn. After 45 days, we measured thermal sensitivities of running speed and thermal tolerances (critical thermal maximum and chill-coma recovery time). Contrary to our expectation, thermal treatments did not affect the thermal sensitivity of locomotion; isopods from all treatments ran fastest at 33° to 34°C and achieved more than 80% of their maximal speed over a range of 10° to 11°C. Isopods exposed to a stochastic decline in temperature tolerated cold the best, and isopods exposed to a constant temperature of 20°C tolerated cold the worst. No significant variation in heat tolerance was observed among groups. Therefore, thermal sensitivity and heat tolerance failed to acclimate to any type of thermal change, whereas cold tolerance acclimated more during stochastic change than it did during abrupt change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3117853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31178532011-06-22 Isopods Failed to Acclimate Their Thermal Sensitivity of Locomotor Performance during Predictable or Stochastic Cooling Schuler, Matthew S. Cooper, Brandon S. Storm, Jonathan J. Sears, Michael W. Angilletta, Michael J. PLoS One Research Article Most organisms experience environments that vary continuously over time, yet researchers generally study phenotypic responses to abrupt and sustained changes in environmental conditions. Gradual environmental changes, whether predictable or stochastic, might affect organisms differently than do abrupt changes. To explore this possibility, we exposed terrestrial isopods (Porcellio scaber) collected from a highly seasonal environment to four thermal treatments: (1) a constant 20°C; (2) a constant 10°C; (3) a steady decline from 20° to 10°C; and (4) a stochastic decline from 20° to 10°C that mimicked natural conditions during autumn. After 45 days, we measured thermal sensitivities of running speed and thermal tolerances (critical thermal maximum and chill-coma recovery time). Contrary to our expectation, thermal treatments did not affect the thermal sensitivity of locomotion; isopods from all treatments ran fastest at 33° to 34°C and achieved more than 80% of their maximal speed over a range of 10° to 11°C. Isopods exposed to a stochastic decline in temperature tolerated cold the best, and isopods exposed to a constant temperature of 20°C tolerated cold the worst. No significant variation in heat tolerance was observed among groups. Therefore, thermal sensitivity and heat tolerance failed to acclimate to any type of thermal change, whereas cold tolerance acclimated more during stochastic change than it did during abrupt change. Public Library of Science 2011-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3117853/ /pubmed/21698113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020905 Text en Schuler et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schuler, Matthew S.
Cooper, Brandon S.
Storm, Jonathan J.
Sears, Michael W.
Angilletta, Michael J.
Isopods Failed to Acclimate Their Thermal Sensitivity of Locomotor Performance during Predictable or Stochastic Cooling
title Isopods Failed to Acclimate Their Thermal Sensitivity of Locomotor Performance during Predictable or Stochastic Cooling
title_full Isopods Failed to Acclimate Their Thermal Sensitivity of Locomotor Performance during Predictable or Stochastic Cooling
title_fullStr Isopods Failed to Acclimate Their Thermal Sensitivity of Locomotor Performance during Predictable or Stochastic Cooling
title_full_unstemmed Isopods Failed to Acclimate Their Thermal Sensitivity of Locomotor Performance during Predictable or Stochastic Cooling
title_short Isopods Failed to Acclimate Their Thermal Sensitivity of Locomotor Performance during Predictable or Stochastic Cooling
title_sort isopods failed to acclimate their thermal sensitivity of locomotor performance during predictable or stochastic cooling
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3117853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21698113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020905
work_keys_str_mv AT schulermatthews isopodsfailedtoacclimatetheirthermalsensitivityoflocomotorperformanceduringpredictableorstochasticcooling
AT cooperbrandons isopodsfailedtoacclimatetheirthermalsensitivityoflocomotorperformanceduringpredictableorstochasticcooling
AT stormjonathanj isopodsfailedtoacclimatetheirthermalsensitivityoflocomotorperformanceduringpredictableorstochasticcooling
AT searsmichaelw isopodsfailedtoacclimatetheirthermalsensitivityoflocomotorperformanceduringpredictableorstochasticcooling
AT angillettamichaelj isopodsfailedtoacclimatetheirthermalsensitivityoflocomotorperformanceduringpredictableorstochasticcooling