Cargando…
Isopods Failed to Acclimate Their Thermal Sensitivity of Locomotor Performance during Predictable or Stochastic Cooling
Most organisms experience environments that vary continuously over time, yet researchers generally study phenotypic responses to abrupt and sustained changes in environmental conditions. Gradual environmental changes, whether predictable or stochastic, might affect organisms differently than do abru...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3117853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21698113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020905 |
_version_ | 1782206389285814272 |
---|---|
author | Schuler, Matthew S. Cooper, Brandon S. Storm, Jonathan J. Sears, Michael W. Angilletta, Michael J. |
author_facet | Schuler, Matthew S. Cooper, Brandon S. Storm, Jonathan J. Sears, Michael W. Angilletta, Michael J. |
author_sort | Schuler, Matthew S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most organisms experience environments that vary continuously over time, yet researchers generally study phenotypic responses to abrupt and sustained changes in environmental conditions. Gradual environmental changes, whether predictable or stochastic, might affect organisms differently than do abrupt changes. To explore this possibility, we exposed terrestrial isopods (Porcellio scaber) collected from a highly seasonal environment to four thermal treatments: (1) a constant 20°C; (2) a constant 10°C; (3) a steady decline from 20° to 10°C; and (4) a stochastic decline from 20° to 10°C that mimicked natural conditions during autumn. After 45 days, we measured thermal sensitivities of running speed and thermal tolerances (critical thermal maximum and chill-coma recovery time). Contrary to our expectation, thermal treatments did not affect the thermal sensitivity of locomotion; isopods from all treatments ran fastest at 33° to 34°C and achieved more than 80% of their maximal speed over a range of 10° to 11°C. Isopods exposed to a stochastic decline in temperature tolerated cold the best, and isopods exposed to a constant temperature of 20°C tolerated cold the worst. No significant variation in heat tolerance was observed among groups. Therefore, thermal sensitivity and heat tolerance failed to acclimate to any type of thermal change, whereas cold tolerance acclimated more during stochastic change than it did during abrupt change. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3117853 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31178532011-06-22 Isopods Failed to Acclimate Their Thermal Sensitivity of Locomotor Performance during Predictable or Stochastic Cooling Schuler, Matthew S. Cooper, Brandon S. Storm, Jonathan J. Sears, Michael W. Angilletta, Michael J. PLoS One Research Article Most organisms experience environments that vary continuously over time, yet researchers generally study phenotypic responses to abrupt and sustained changes in environmental conditions. Gradual environmental changes, whether predictable or stochastic, might affect organisms differently than do abrupt changes. To explore this possibility, we exposed terrestrial isopods (Porcellio scaber) collected from a highly seasonal environment to four thermal treatments: (1) a constant 20°C; (2) a constant 10°C; (3) a steady decline from 20° to 10°C; and (4) a stochastic decline from 20° to 10°C that mimicked natural conditions during autumn. After 45 days, we measured thermal sensitivities of running speed and thermal tolerances (critical thermal maximum and chill-coma recovery time). Contrary to our expectation, thermal treatments did not affect the thermal sensitivity of locomotion; isopods from all treatments ran fastest at 33° to 34°C and achieved more than 80% of their maximal speed over a range of 10° to 11°C. Isopods exposed to a stochastic decline in temperature tolerated cold the best, and isopods exposed to a constant temperature of 20°C tolerated cold the worst. No significant variation in heat tolerance was observed among groups. Therefore, thermal sensitivity and heat tolerance failed to acclimate to any type of thermal change, whereas cold tolerance acclimated more during stochastic change than it did during abrupt change. Public Library of Science 2011-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3117853/ /pubmed/21698113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020905 Text en Schuler et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schuler, Matthew S. Cooper, Brandon S. Storm, Jonathan J. Sears, Michael W. Angilletta, Michael J. Isopods Failed to Acclimate Their Thermal Sensitivity of Locomotor Performance during Predictable or Stochastic Cooling |
title | Isopods Failed to Acclimate Their Thermal Sensitivity of Locomotor Performance during Predictable or Stochastic Cooling |
title_full | Isopods Failed to Acclimate Their Thermal Sensitivity of Locomotor Performance during Predictable or Stochastic Cooling |
title_fullStr | Isopods Failed to Acclimate Their Thermal Sensitivity of Locomotor Performance during Predictable or Stochastic Cooling |
title_full_unstemmed | Isopods Failed to Acclimate Their Thermal Sensitivity of Locomotor Performance during Predictable or Stochastic Cooling |
title_short | Isopods Failed to Acclimate Their Thermal Sensitivity of Locomotor Performance during Predictable or Stochastic Cooling |
title_sort | isopods failed to acclimate their thermal sensitivity of locomotor performance during predictable or stochastic cooling |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3117853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21698113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020905 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schulermatthews isopodsfailedtoacclimatetheirthermalsensitivityoflocomotorperformanceduringpredictableorstochasticcooling AT cooperbrandons isopodsfailedtoacclimatetheirthermalsensitivityoflocomotorperformanceduringpredictableorstochasticcooling AT stormjonathanj isopodsfailedtoacclimatetheirthermalsensitivityoflocomotorperformanceduringpredictableorstochasticcooling AT searsmichaelw isopodsfailedtoacclimatetheirthermalsensitivityoflocomotorperformanceduringpredictableorstochasticcooling AT angillettamichaelj isopodsfailedtoacclimatetheirthermalsensitivityoflocomotorperformanceduringpredictableorstochasticcooling |