Cargando…

Integrating an ecological approach into an Aboriginal community-based chronic disease prevention program: a longitudinal process evaluation

BACKGROUND: Public health promotes an ecological approach to chronic disease prevention, however, little research has been conducted to assess the integration of an ecological approach in community-based prevention programs. This study sought to contribute to the evidence base by assessing the exten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cargo, Margaret, Marks, Elisabeth, Brimblecombe, Julie, Scarlett, Maria, Maypilama, Elaine, Dhurrkay, Joanne Garnggulkpuy, Daniel, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3118236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21569320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-299
_version_ 1782206443722637312
author Cargo, Margaret
Marks, Elisabeth
Brimblecombe, Julie
Scarlett, Maria
Maypilama, Elaine
Dhurrkay, Joanne Garnggulkpuy
Daniel, Mark
author_facet Cargo, Margaret
Marks, Elisabeth
Brimblecombe, Julie
Scarlett, Maria
Maypilama, Elaine
Dhurrkay, Joanne Garnggulkpuy
Daniel, Mark
author_sort Cargo, Margaret
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Public health promotes an ecological approach to chronic disease prevention, however, little research has been conducted to assess the integration of an ecological approach in community-based prevention programs. This study sought to contribute to the evidence base by assessing the extent to which an ecological approach was integrated into an Aboriginal community-based cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes prevention program, across three-intervention years. METHODS: Activity implementation forms were completed by interview with implementers and participant observation across three intervention years. A standardised ecological coding procedure was applied to assess participant recruitment settings, intervention targets, intervention strategy types, extent of ecologicalness and organisational partnering. Inter-rater reliability for two coders was assessed at Kappa = 0.76 (p < .0.001), 95% CI (0.58, 0.94). RESULTS: 215 activities were implemented across three intervention years by the health program (HP) with some activities implemented in multiple years. Participants were recruited most frequently through organisational settings in years 1 and 2, and organisational and community settings in year 3. The most commonly utilised intervention targets were the individual (IND) as a direct target, and interpersonal (INT) and organisational (ORG) environments as indirect targets; policy (POL), and community (COM) were targeted least. Direct (HP→ IND) and indirect intervention strategies (i.e., HP→ INT→ IND, HP→ POL → IND) were used most often; networking strategies, which link at least two targets (i.e., HP→[ORG-ORG]→IND), were used the least. The program did not become more ecological over time. CONCLUSIONS: The quantity of activities with IND, INT and ORG targets and the proportion of participants recruited through informal cultural networking demonstrate community commitment to prevention. Integration of an ecological approach would have been facilitated by greater inter-organisational collaboration and centralised planning. The upfront time required for community stakeholders to develop their capacity to mobilise around chronic disease is at odds with short-term funding cycles that emphasise organisational accountability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3118236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31182362011-06-19 Integrating an ecological approach into an Aboriginal community-based chronic disease prevention program: a longitudinal process evaluation Cargo, Margaret Marks, Elisabeth Brimblecombe, Julie Scarlett, Maria Maypilama, Elaine Dhurrkay, Joanne Garnggulkpuy Daniel, Mark BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Public health promotes an ecological approach to chronic disease prevention, however, little research has been conducted to assess the integration of an ecological approach in community-based prevention programs. This study sought to contribute to the evidence base by assessing the extent to which an ecological approach was integrated into an Aboriginal community-based cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes prevention program, across three-intervention years. METHODS: Activity implementation forms were completed by interview with implementers and participant observation across three intervention years. A standardised ecological coding procedure was applied to assess participant recruitment settings, intervention targets, intervention strategy types, extent of ecologicalness and organisational partnering. Inter-rater reliability for two coders was assessed at Kappa = 0.76 (p < .0.001), 95% CI (0.58, 0.94). RESULTS: 215 activities were implemented across three intervention years by the health program (HP) with some activities implemented in multiple years. Participants were recruited most frequently through organisational settings in years 1 and 2, and organisational and community settings in year 3. The most commonly utilised intervention targets were the individual (IND) as a direct target, and interpersonal (INT) and organisational (ORG) environments as indirect targets; policy (POL), and community (COM) were targeted least. Direct (HP→ IND) and indirect intervention strategies (i.e., HP→ INT→ IND, HP→ POL → IND) were used most often; networking strategies, which link at least two targets (i.e., HP→[ORG-ORG]→IND), were used the least. The program did not become more ecological over time. CONCLUSIONS: The quantity of activities with IND, INT and ORG targets and the proportion of participants recruited through informal cultural networking demonstrate community commitment to prevention. Integration of an ecological approach would have been facilitated by greater inter-organisational collaboration and centralised planning. The upfront time required for community stakeholders to develop their capacity to mobilise around chronic disease is at odds with short-term funding cycles that emphasise organisational accountability. BioMed Central 2011-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3118236/ /pubmed/21569320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-299 Text en Copyright ©2011 Cargo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cargo, Margaret
Marks, Elisabeth
Brimblecombe, Julie
Scarlett, Maria
Maypilama, Elaine
Dhurrkay, Joanne Garnggulkpuy
Daniel, Mark
Integrating an ecological approach into an Aboriginal community-based chronic disease prevention program: a longitudinal process evaluation
title Integrating an ecological approach into an Aboriginal community-based chronic disease prevention program: a longitudinal process evaluation
title_full Integrating an ecological approach into an Aboriginal community-based chronic disease prevention program: a longitudinal process evaluation
title_fullStr Integrating an ecological approach into an Aboriginal community-based chronic disease prevention program: a longitudinal process evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Integrating an ecological approach into an Aboriginal community-based chronic disease prevention program: a longitudinal process evaluation
title_short Integrating an ecological approach into an Aboriginal community-based chronic disease prevention program: a longitudinal process evaluation
title_sort integrating an ecological approach into an aboriginal community-based chronic disease prevention program: a longitudinal process evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3118236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21569320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-299
work_keys_str_mv AT cargomargaret integratinganecologicalapproachintoanaboriginalcommunitybasedchronicdiseasepreventionprogramalongitudinalprocessevaluation
AT markselisabeth integratinganecologicalapproachintoanaboriginalcommunitybasedchronicdiseasepreventionprogramalongitudinalprocessevaluation
AT brimblecombejulie integratinganecologicalapproachintoanaboriginalcommunitybasedchronicdiseasepreventionprogramalongitudinalprocessevaluation
AT scarlettmaria integratinganecologicalapproachintoanaboriginalcommunitybasedchronicdiseasepreventionprogramalongitudinalprocessevaluation
AT maypilamaelaine integratinganecologicalapproachintoanaboriginalcommunitybasedchronicdiseasepreventionprogramalongitudinalprocessevaluation
AT dhurrkayjoannegarnggulkpuy integratinganecologicalapproachintoanaboriginalcommunitybasedchronicdiseasepreventionprogramalongitudinalprocessevaluation
AT danielmark integratinganecologicalapproachintoanaboriginalcommunitybasedchronicdiseasepreventionprogramalongitudinalprocessevaluation